Gene Frenkle

Aren't you worried that your million dollar "duplex" will roll down the mountain? Lighten up, I'm just kidding.

I might be insane for continually reading your posts and expecting them to be relevant or make sense.

I think you're mixing up your stereotypes. Liberals are traditionally hippies more than anything. I'm pretty sure that being metro sexual isn't really associated with one party or the other. Now get back in your trailer, Cletus.

The bandwagon jumping phoney probably has a Kobe jersey on under that schitty tainted sweatshirt.

Don't forget about Chuck Norris. Texas is turning into Quebec for rednecks.

It seems that it occurs to him that the Founders didn't know what they were doing. I'd say he's wrong.

You were my inspiration and no, OM is is pretty much just a troll. I could certainly be wrong about his motivations - it's just a guess.

Personally, I think he's satirizing you and yours kind of like Colbert. He's nailed it so well that you don't even realize it.

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination." -Albert Einstein

I agree with you. I think that whatever relationship is there is a bad thing. I also think that you're deliberately blowing the connection out of proportion. It reminds me of stories of members of the Bush administration allegedly insisting that Fox News be on the boob tube at all times. But we were talking about whether or not the new Science Czar is an 'ultra-abortionist' monster because of an extreme contingency paper/book/study that he authored.

Right, overpopulation will never be a problem. China is actually running campaigns asking its peasants to have more children, particularly baby girls. At least 3 per family. Also, a A hypothetical is not a prediction. Your bashing of research based on your absolute claim that over-population can never be an issue speaks to your uncritical way of thinking. Why do you care? Because you heard the word abortion?

Stop changing the subject. I don't give a schitt about the DailyKos or its pro-Obama stance because they are not even a somewhat credible or unbiased news source. Your rant is completely off topic.

BFD, the DailyKos is just as bad, but you don't see me citing articles from that hack of a site. If you ever do, please feel free to call me a lemming and assume that I have lost all objectivity. I'm sure you would have to stand in line to do so around here.

He's starting to grow on me. Like a hemorrhoid.

So what exactly are you objecting to and what is your alternate solution to problem introduced by the hypothetical?

But I play a meaner cowbell.

Obviously just about any jackass can build a web page or post some nonsense on a message board. If it's on the internet it must be true, right?

Nice news source, btw, you lemming! Way to avoid partisan publications and keep an open mind... Some other selected headlines from WorldNetDaily (http://www.wnd.com): OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL WorldNetDaily Exclusive Did radical Muslims help send Obama to Harvard? White House refuses to release president's law school records --WND AP poll: Country now on wrong track Doubts grow about whether Obama can succeed at biggest items on to-do list --Associated Press Obama less popular than Carter after 6 months President's disapproval rate has jumped 16 points to 41% --USA Today WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE WorldNetDaily Exclusive Where's Obama leading? Mark Levin knows Behind the captivating rhetoric, a revolutionary agenda unfolds --WND BORN IN THE USA? WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama's online 'birth cert' misses 'proving' eligibility 'There are some documents that say things that aren't true' --WND WorldNetDaily Exclusive Limbaugh: 'Obama has yet to prove he's a citizen' Radio giant blasts president's refusal to show long-form birth certificate --WND

Ok, it sounds extreme. It also sounds like more of a thought experiment than anything else. The obvious reaction is to cast stones. The more interesting discussion involves performing the thought experiment yourself. What methods do you think would be necessary to control a runaway population count? Is it somehow more ethical to let some of the population starve to death for lack of food? Seriously, if you had to find a solution to the problem, what methods would you employ? Or don't - it's far easier to spin something like this for the sake of partisan rhetoric. I'd love to see where this ends up. I'd imagine that in the extreme case, you'd end up with something similar - something forced.

They probably too distracted to notice you even without the tinted windows. It's a real problem.

Somebody's got a man crush!

You drive on public roads which are maintained by government workers and are both state and federally funded. The state and federal governments have every right to lay down the rules as to what you can and cannot do on their roadways. It is also a matter of public safety. Your individual rights do not take precedence over the well being of the general population. If the numbers say cell phone use, hands-free or otherwise, have a significant effect on road safety then they should not be used while driving. You can't make a rational argument against this.

I choose to follow the law and wear my seatbelt all the time because I prefer not to die unless absolutely necessary. Congrats on avoiding seatbelt tickets, though.

You seem to be forgetting that driving is a privilege, not a right.