daquixers

http://www.billszone.com/coppermine/albums...phins39%7E0.jpg

ESPN was just talking about what I was saying yesterday. Teams are figuring out Big Ben. Ben Roethlisberger hasnt had to win 1 game yet. His team has been carrying him. A lot of his yards come off of the play-action. THANK-YOU! Someone agrees with me!

No. Earliest we could be eliminated is week 14 (if we keep winning) at that would mean that the Jets and Baltimore won their remaining games makes it impossible for us to catch up to them.

I actually picked Oakland to win. Look at my posts from yesterday. Secondly, Oakland is on a whole different level than the Dolphins. The Dolphins squeeked out a win against one of the worst teams in NFL history.

Ugh - the Raiders are about 10x better than the Dolphins. IMO it will be an easy win.

1. Q: Is he washed up? A: possibly, but I cant say that yet 2. Q: Was he asked to learn an entire new offense in 3 weeks in training camp? A: Yes 3. Q: Does he have an entire new offensive game plan, coordinator, and coach? A: Yes 4. Q: Did he have a running back that did close to nothing for the first 5 weeks? A: Yes 5. Q: Does he deserve just ONE more chance to get it right A: YES. And this is why. I dont think Gregg Williams was a good coach. If he wasnt a good coach, how do you expect Bledsoe to be a good player when he is learning from a bad coach! I also dont think its fair to make him learn an entire new offense in 3 weeks, struggle early, turn it around and then lose his job. Ok. Now ICE, JP-Era and everyone else can rant on how he was terrible for 2 years, and I will say this "LOOK AT THE COACHES" QUOTE from ESPN

If we play like we did Sunday against the Seahawks the Dolphin game will be over by halftime. If we play like we did opening week against the Jaguars, it will take us another quarter to win the game - probably going into the 4th quarter. LOL - no matter what , we arent losing this game. They got beat by the team we just beat by 29 points and barely beat one of the worst teams in NFL history. Bills - 31 Dolfins - 9

and lets be real - starting a QB before he is ready (Eli Manning, Kyle Boller, Craig Krenzel) is NOT a good thing

Sorry - its 1:50 am - im extremely tired All of your scenarious only help us - so - bring em on!!

You do realize a huge part of Mularkey's hiring was because he wanted to use Bledsoe. Donahoe wouldnt hire anyone who didnt want too man.

HUH? The only good bad they have seen all year was Rudi Johnson and he had 120 yards.

Ravens beats Giants and Miami , lose to Cinci, Colts and Pitt = there out Broncos beats Miami and Tenn , lose to SD, KC, and the Colts = there out Jacksonville beats Chicago, houston, and oakland , loses to Pitt and GB Whatdya know - where in the playoffs (Barring we in out)

Bump - everyone needs to see this

100% agree

Thank-goodness they arent.

It's just not fair to give Drew 1 year to learn an entire new system and then he goes 10-6 and you dump him. If he goe's 10-6 with a new system, he deserves another year. No doubt. Not to mention he didnt have McGahee 1/2 the season.

All 17 points in the first half were attributed to the passing game - Willis had 40 yards going into halftime.

ICE and his followers (lol) - what is wrong with you guys. I hear you. I understand that you think we win in spite of Drew. But we are winning. If we go 10-6, you dont want Drew starting next season? I for one, sure as heck would. That would mean he brought a team that started 0-4, and then went 10-2 with them the rest of the way! There are factors other than just slinging the ball that comes into the playing off a QB. Controlling the game. I truly think Drew does that better than 85% of the QB's in the league. He is a veteran in that sense. JP doesnt know how to do that yet. Your telling me not playing JP 1 more year is going to hurt him? I think that would only help him and considering we could be 7-4 or 8-3 right now if it wasnt for 2 defensive embarrisments and a bad refereed game tells me that Drew is doing a good enough job. Are you not happy with 10-6? I am - for a ROOKIE coaches year with all new staff ... etc I am happy with 10-6 or 9-7 and I believe with Bledsoe at QB next year we can go 11-5 or 12-4. With JP - rookie QB - probably 7-9 at best. He has to learn how to be a leader, controll the game and sling the ball. Do you not see what I am saying?

Bledsoe might ride the bench - depends on how this season ends. If we finish 9-7 or 10-6 I GUARANTEE Bledsoe will have a 90% chance of starting next season.

Considering the "current" Willis McGahee will mostly likely run for 1500 yards in a 16 game season I dont this "current" guy.

I dont think taking a chance at jeopardizing our slim playoff hopes is the way to go.

Its not our 5-6 record were OK with. Its the fact that WITH BLEDSOE AS QB, we could easily be 7-4 or 8-3 right now if a few calls had went our way. The DEFENSE lost Bledsoe the game in week 1. The REF's lost Bledsoe the game in week 2. The DEFENSE lost the first Jets game. So we could be 8-3 if it wasnt for the late touchdown againt Jacksonvillle, the refs stupidity and the late scoring drive in NY. And heres something you may not know - Bledsoe stays on the sidelines during DEFENSIVE time!

I think 2 of the 3 interceptions could have also been big plays. The 1 interception thrown right in the middle of the field was totally his fault. The other two were just overthrown balls that he was looking for TD's. Cant fualt him for that. If you think JP would have done better then your smoking crack. Bledsoe manages the game well ... thats why I like him.

Im still trying to figure out why everyone loves Champ Bailey. His best year was what? 5 interceptions? If its the defelections, heck, even Nate Clements gets 10-15 deflections a year!

Miami looked decent lately? Slowly put down the pipe - lol. Miami squeeked out a win against one of the worst teams I have seen in recent memory and got beat by a team that we beat 38-9 ... they dont exactly scare me.