RkFast

What are you a !@#$ing librarian? Hey, YOU are the one who made a factually incorrect statement to forward your agenda, not me. Thank God for that. You sound like a hoot at parties. And youre just a regular Joel Osteen, arent ya? Watching The Thornbirds and discussing it over a cheesburger with your one capitive friends doesnt count as "study and debate" And I spend lots and lots of times in the woods. It doesnt make me a lumberjack. AND BINGO...THERE IT IS. Admit it, sweetie....the knock on academia I made is what got you in a knot, isnt it? I hate to tell you, but saying "who the !@#$ am I" really doesnt cancel out all the other stuff youve already said proving youre a total pompous ass. Speaking to a million priests and nuns and monks (monks??!!!??) doesnt reveal this. Two open eyes do. So because I can look up why Van Halen is cancelling tour dates on a computer, religious institutions should change the underpinnings of thousands of years of doctrine. Brilliant. Um...the Earth was proven to be round hundreds of years ago. Your point holds ZERO water. But I do....hold on, I gotta pee. I know what you mean...Ive been asking "God, why the !@#$ am I wasting my time with this dullard?" for fifteen minutes now. Youre right..toss those Bibles, and Torahs....who needs em!!??!! Yeah...you have a "deep respect" for religion with statements like THIS. Not what I said. For a real fart smeller...er...smart feller....you didnt get my basic point?

Im done with you.....Get the !@#$ out of my face.

That's incorrect. The Nazis rose to power by making the Communists the outcasts and it was earlier than 38. It wasnt until Hitler and the Nazis had firm control of Germany that they turned their attention to the Jews. To folks like yourself, people who use their faith as the basis of their moral compass and think differently than you are having their "judgement clouded." But liberals and non-beleivers who get their "religion" and moral compass from academia, the New York Times, or whatever the latest trend is, according to folks like yourself, have it all right and are as clear thinking as they come. Its an elitist way of thinking, in its purest form. And another flaw in the thinking. This idea that religious people are "discriminating" against homosexuals. Who is the Church discriminating against by holding this view? Religious institutions dont make policy beyond its doors. And religion has firm rules up and down affecting things much smaller than marriage and guess what? have a list of "rules" a mile long for men and women to get married. Im a Catholic and had to marry a girl, also a Catholic, in a Church, had to attend 'marriage classes' before we were able to and also had to have reached other milestones in my religous journey like Confirmation, first. Not being gay is just one of MANY criteria one must meet in order to be married in the Catholic faith. Do Jews "discriminate" against pig farmers? Do Catholics "discriminate" against meal lovers during Lent?The list goes on.

Im leaning towards this. It seems that the effort is to not towards injury prevention, but injury elimination. And if thats your objective, then it really is a zero sum game where the end of the sport is the only thing that will meet that objective.

So what if it is. Many of the other boards I pollute swing totally left. In fact, most do. So this is like the Fox News of discussion boards. All we need is a "leg chair" and we are all set.

Out!@#$ingstanding. Im sure this will be written off by the left as 'desparation.' Ya know....the SAME left that felt a hit piece about a teenage Mitt Romney with shady facts, questionable third party testimonials and full of innuendo was"hard hitting investigative journalism."

Racist!

Not only do you continue with your elitist approach, you continue to misconstrue the points many were making in that other thread you reference in order to forward your agenda. You then talk about the"hypocrisy" of the faithful and how intolerant they are while at the same time showing a level of bigotry and intolerance twoards them on par or worse than they have ever shown towards homosexuals. You wont even acknowledge the moral conflict many are having with the issue as their positions change and evolve over time. You wont respect why they may feel the way they do and where those feelings come from. Evidently, only Barry Soetoro is "permitted" to "evolve" on the issue. The rest of us are just knuckle-dragging bigots and always will be, according to you. You really are a complete utter !@#$ing !@#$.

Ill "tolerate" the guy in assless chaps shaking his ass against a drag queen in the public park during "pride" events when YOU "tolerate" a church group signing "Hark the Herald Angels Sing" in the same public park on Christmas Eve. Deal? As far as that boxer goes, you DO realize he was misquoted and PACQUIAO NEVER MADE THAT STATEMENT, right? http://blogs.laweekl...te_timeline.php

All I know is, I was reading an article about Dave Mustaine wanting to start a "supergroup" with Lars Ullrich and James Hetfield and the idiot writer had to inject Mustaine's feelings on gay marriage. I cant even read about a thrash metal band without hearing about gay marriage. Of all the things that need to be worked on in this Country...the obsession is gay marriage. Enough about !@#$ing gay marriage.

Read up on the Axelod thingy here.. http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47438 Its dirty politics at its' worst.

I do. Axelrod.

Fair enough. I take back my comment then. It was fun screwing with DiN, though.

Joke flew RIGHT the !@#$ over your head. Morans http://forums.twobil...ht-in-virginia/ And the best part is, you took part in that thread. So I guess BS namecalling and labels is only "bad" when its toward one of your sacred cows. Thanks for being part of the problem. I may not have any class, but unlike you I have integrity.

http://www.nydailyne...ticle-1.1076395 Nice! The Democrats better start sending political hacks into the bathhouses to grouse out more faggots and unemployed illegal alien college grads with their "women's studies" degrees or they are going no where with Barry.

Dont like it? Dont live there.

Still smarting from the beat down I laid on you the other day.

Yes, it needs to be remedied, but you, as one seeking the change, has to understand why those who dont want to feel the way they do. Until you do that, nothing will change.

The SSM set HAS to acknowledge what they seek to do. They seek to alter one of the pillars of society. Thats big time stuff and those reluctant to it arent all a bunch of "close-minded rednecks"....maybe they just have trepidation about such a massive undertaking and need some help understanding why this is the right thing to do. And this is where the SSM set fails. By the way...the abolition of slavery didnt happen in a few years, either. People didnt just "wake up" and say its wrong. Someone TAUGHT THEM that its wrong. They showed the slaveowners the light. And this is what the SSM set has to do now with this issue. The SSM wants the change. So they are the ones that have to do the heavy lifting of showing why this has to happen. And just yelling "BIGOT!!!!" and glitterbombing everyone who is reluctant to move forward on this issue doesnt even come CLOSE to doing that heavy lifting. Its a complete failure on their part to move those against it toward the light. What do you think will cause change? Embarrassing Rick Santorum on TV with glitter? Or seeking him out and talking to him about why your life partner is dying in the hospital without health insurance becuase you cant marry him and have those married benefits like health insurance? The others position is a mess? big·ot·ry    /ˈbɪgətri/ [/url]Show Spelled[big-uh-tree] Show IPA noun, plural big·ot·ries. 1. stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own. Who is being the bigot?

So in other words.."Its Mark Miller's way or the highway...and if you dont agree with me youre irrational and stupid." How "tolerant", "compassionate", "empathetic" and "open minded." Why try to understand the other's POV and try to convince them that change is the right thing to do, when you can just mock them and call them names?

There is only one rational conclusion. John's gay and needs health insurance.

Understand. I think it goes beyond just boomer dying off, though.

That's naive. Thats my entire point. Nobody is looking into WHY "the other side" feels the way they do. Nobody.

This is a legit reason for allowing it but saying many object to it becuase of traditions that go back thousands of years is "weak." Youre a real peach. Once again, you prove your own bigotry. You really need to look up the definition of that word. So instead of helping those who are against SSM understand why this is the right thing to do, you look down your elitist nose at them, mock them, and minimalize them. Nice. Im aware of that. It was a figure of speech, you !@#$ing !@#$. But thats not what I said. I was trying to explain why people may be against it, without passing judgement on those people. Tried to show you that right or wrong, there is a good reason why people feel the way they do and its goes MUCH deeper than "hatin' on those faggots." It goes to the core of who they are as people and to the core of the society they live in, its cultures and traditions. And such things dont change overnight even when those traditions are odious. But instead of your "triple digit IQ" realizing that, you blathered about dogs and cats living together. Nice work.