RkFast

Oh my God.....Deb's real itentity is finally revealed...SHES REALLY BILL GATES!!!!

I think we are BOTH making some assumptions on what the other said...both incorrectly. Lets leave it at that. I still stand by my statement, however that appeasement will never work in combatting Evil.

So YOU making assumptions and drawing your own conclusions without getting further clarification=GOOD Anyone else doing it=BAD If you cant figure out you did the same exact thing you got pissy with me for, then there's no help for you.

You write this here and then in the now closed "Under attack" thread say I stated "that terrorism aparrently can be stomped out 100 percent " Youve got some set of balls.

Come on....we all know they were "little Eichmanns" who had it coming! Words of Wisdom.... "I have, myself, full confidence that if all do their duty, if nothing is neglected, and if the best arrangements are made, as they are being made, we shall prove ourselves once again able to defend our Island home, to ride out the storm of war, and to outlive the menace of tyranny, if necessary for years, if necessary alone. At any rate, that is what we are going to try to do. That is the resolve of His Majesty's Government-every man of them. That is the will of Parliament and the nation. The British Empire and the French Republic, linked together in their cause and in their need, will defend to the death their native soil, aiding each other like good comrades to the utmost of their strength. Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."

This attitude as shown above, one of the hallmarks of the left, is one of the most spineless, reprehensible and downright irresponsible ways of thinking ever imagined. And if allowed to prevail, either now or in the past, our way of life would not even be in existence. Lets allow evil to take root and just "give in" to it...becuase hey...its "not going away". So why fight it, right? People who think like this should be slapped silly. Or sat in a room with a hisotry book or two. One on a THIRD GRADE level would probably do the trick.

Hey, why not? Here in NYC, a white man who beat a black guy senseless is going down as a "hate crime." Nevermind the fact that the poor slob beaten was casing the neighborhood for cars to steal and admitted it.

The statement "I did not have sex with that woman........" has more relevance to the issue than the statement above.

Those "over the top" techniques like turning the A/C down and playing rap music loudly!!!! Up next at GTMO.......asking the person being interrogated for information without saying "please". OH.......THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I do agree with Joey's other point, however.

The only thing "proven" is that there are certain groups where its OK to lump people together and others where its not, which is bull sh--.

Nope...never seen "priest=gay pedophile". Nope.....never seen "All Catholics are anti-gay". Nope.....never seen "all Christians are intolerant Red Stater boobs". NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Let me ask all of you this.....if Homosexuals dont use thier sexuality to define their themselves as you claim, then why is there a gay/lesbian/transgender club for everything from fly fishing to cycling?

Ah, but "some of your best friends are gay", right? Please. My point and question is that the Homosexual's lobby attempts to interject their sex lives into every other part of their lives goes far beyond their desire for marriage rights and why is that so? A simple observation and question. We ARE still allowed to observe and question things, right? Jeez, Darin....of all people to puke up the self-righteous knee-jerk bull sh--, Id expect you to be the LAST person to do it.

Given that a Homosexual cant even buy a Big Mac without prefacing his or her order with "Im gay...", I'd say Homosexuals are looking for something besides just being "accepted". They want more....not sure what it is.....but its something. Knee-jerk "Your a filthy bigot" accusations in 5-4-3-2.........

Im confused (shocker) abou Harry Reid's comments on last night: "The president's numerous references to September 11 did not provide a way forward in Iraq," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said. "They only served to remind the American people that our most dangerous enemy, namely Osama bin Laden, is still on the loose and al Qaeda remains capable of doing this nation great harm nearly four years after it attacked America." Bush's speech talked of the ENTIRE GWOT, not just Iraq. So the latter part of the above is worthy of critiscism how? Im thinking Reid is realllllly reaching here.

Its also WRONG for a lot of people. But dont let the voice of the majority sway opinion or anything.

One day, Rummy is going to say "whew....little cold in D.C. this morning" and the usual suspects will decry it as a secret kabal to falsely pump up sales of wool coats through the loosely connected Wool Coat subsidiary of Halliburton.

Personally, Im downright SHOCKED the ACLU or some other left-wing group didnt get their panties all bunched up over Billy Graham having his last crusade in a public park in NYC.

By pointing out that Rove was correct in that is was the Left that spent most of their time raising the issue, whether valid or not, you got all that other crap?

NO HE DIDNT!!!!! HE COULDNT!!!! Could he??!!??

After 9/11 who was asking "why do they hate us"? Clue: It wasnt people on the RIGHT, it was people on the ? But you keep thinking this comment by Rove, which at least has a decent amount of truth to it, is the same as what Dean has been spewing.

This is fuggin scary. Its one thing for the govt. to use "Eminent Domain" for the purpose of public projects like road work and what not. But to use it for PRIVATE projects? WTF? THIS is something the ACLU should get involved in, no? Instead of freaking out over a Christian teacher uttering the word "God", how about THIS issue?

Well, thank you for pointing that out and putting some perspective on the question I posed. But still...why are they now "evil tools of the administration"? And if the disdain for these compainies go back through several Democratic Administrations, why is the Left using KBR and Halliburton in their "anti-Bush" crusade? Its like selling your Chevy because "all cars are bad"....and then buying a Toyota.

Gotta agree. Good for Daniels for coming forth and preaching the "other" view of the issue, but there wasnt much in that piece one can take home with them, except for the Red Cross thing. If the Red Cross is there every day, why havent they spoken up about the good treatment these prisoners have recevied? Not that their job is to defend the United States. But if groups like AI and others who HAVENT been to GTMO are throwing reckless accusations around, doesnt it indirectly become the responsibility of the group that IS there to speak up and call "bull sh--" to those who are speaking out of turn?

Funny......I dont remember much talk about KBR and Halliburton when Clinton was president.

MMMMMMM.......RED MEAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!