RkFast

I heard the real BHO is a dump truck operator from Scranton, PA. Bowls with his league Tuesday nights and has been married to a fine lady Myrna for 25 years. A good man.

I wonder if the leftards are up in arms today because Adam Lambert lost. Ya know...how those close-minded homophobicchristianwhitemenrushlistersblahblsahblah kept him down.

Yup.

Personally, Im not high on Vick. But heres a little litmus test for you. If Bruce clipped some teenage girl last week instead of getting pulled over for the THIRD TIME for DUI.....how many of you would cancel your hotel in Canton this coming August?

I hate azzholes who walk in, make it rain, and steal all the action.

First of all, one of the LAST people on this God-forsaken pit of a site to be the arbiter of that is stupid and what is not is YOU. So get youre stupid !@#$ing cat out of my face before I shave it, pull out its whiskers, bury it up to its neck and run it over with my John Deere. NOW....... On to your question...Ill just say this. The US Gubmint is going to take over the health care system and eventually....not at first....but eventually start mandating not just which treatments youre entitled to and eligible for, but which ones youre REQUIRED to get. I can EASILY see a mandate that all participants with cholesterol "bad" over a level of 245 be required to be perscribed a statin drug/ This is unlike the current system, where this choice of treatment is simply opional and others freely choose things like diet and excersise changes to get their bad cholesterol down. But in the US' UHC model, I strongly feel the concept of "optional" treatments will be severely curtailed. Your cholesterol a big higer than "we" would like it....you must take this drug. Your blood pressure a bit too high, you must take this one. Suffer from migranes, take this treatment. And if you dont do any of these things.....your coverage is cancelled and/or cut back. Also, Olivier is saying "that doesnt happen in France." Well...duh...this isnt France nor Europe. This isnt just the last of the "free", but the land of the "regulated" and Id bet quite a lot that for every "rule" in the European model of UHC, there will be four in the U.S.' version of it.

You have just realized and embraced one of the fundamental pillars of being against government-run Universal Health Care. Welcome

T-Birds arrived at KFRG for the weekend's airshow. Cant wait. Highlight of the show for me is the Red Bull Mig-17. Hopefully some dimwit libtard will protest the show and how it "glorifies war." Losers. Rob Reider reads this every year during the Heritage Flight: It is the soldier, not the reporter, Who has given us freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, Who has given us freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the organizer, Who has given us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier, Who salutes the flag, Who serves beneath the flag, And whose coffin is draped by the flag, Who allows the protestor to burn the flag. "

I was thinking more along the lines of "who gives a !@#$" as the point. But keep digging up nonsense from the Bushies and trotting out the "we inherited this" excuse for everything. Up next....the Bushies used regular unleaded instead of hi-test in some of the Suburbans.

The Bushies used a Bible for quotations in some documents. The CLintonistas used Cigars to stimulate young chunky interns. POINT?????????????????????????????????

of your idiocy? Yes.

So in this very thread were are hearing about MACS suffering from ALL the same issues as PCs...but they are somehow better than PCs? Dont buy it. If its a better interface for the UE, fine. But this notion that MACs are infallible and PCs are garbage is a bunch of hooey.

Liberals live and die by the victim mentality. According to them, EVERYONE is a "victim." Usually of the actions of a white, male heterosexual or a good looking female Christian. So this "it wasnt MY fault" nonsense shocks you?

Any comment on the crap Clinton and Albright and members of Congress spouted about Iraq and WMD BEFORE 2001????

Even LIBERALS are killing Stretch over this thing. Remember Ed Norton in that flick where he plays the nazi? He comes out of the house and takes on the guys trying to rob him...and says "You just messed with the wrong !@#$ing bull." Pelosi just !@#$ed with the wrong bull...the CIA. Shes DONE. These people document when they go take a dump.

Yes...it is. Only a child who hasnt developed multi dimentional thinking yet would feel otherwise. You want Obama to think and make decisions like a child would? Maybe thats it...liberals are children. Its all about "feelings", casting away reality and one dimensional thinking.

Define: torture

freakshowsayswhat?

Annie agrees with you. Sorry http://www.anncoulter.com/ WATCHING MSNBC IS TORTURE May 6, 2009 The media wail about "torture," but are noticeably short on facts. Liberals try to disguise the utter wussification of our interrogation techniques by constantly prattling on about "the banality of evil." Um, no. In this case, it's actually the banality of the banal. Start with the fact that the average Gitmo detainee has gained 20 pounds in captivity. There's even a medical term for it now: "the Gitmo gut." Some prisoners have been heard whispering, "If you think Allah is great, you should try these dinner rolls." In terms of "torture," there was "the attention grasp," which you have seen in every department store you have ever been where a mother was trying to get her misbehaving child's attention. If "the attention grasp" doesn't work, the interrogators issue a stern warning: "Don't make me pull this car over." Farther up the parade of horribles was "walling," which I will not describe except to say Elliot Spitzer paid extra for it. And for the most hardened terrorists, CIA interrogators had "the caterpillar." Evidently, the terrorists have gotten so fat on the food at Guantanamo, now they can't even outrun a caterpillar. Contrary to MSNBC hosts who are afraid of bugs, water and their own shadows, waterboarding was most definitely not a "war crime" for which the Japanese were prosecuted after World War II -- no matter how many times Mrs. Jonathan Turley, professor of cooking at George Washington University, says so. All MSNBC hosts and guests were apparently reading "Little Women" rather than military books as children and therefore can be easily fooled about Japanese war crimes. (MSNBC: The Official Drama Queen Network of the 2012 Olympics.) Given what the Japanese did to prisoners, waterboarding would be a reward for good behavior. It might be: waterboarding PLUS amputating the prisoner's healthy arm, or waterboarding PLUS killing the prisoner. But waterboarding on the order of what we did at Guantanamo would be a reward in a Japanese POW camp. To claim that the Japanese -- architects of the Bataan Death March -- were prosecuted for "waterboarding" would be like saying Ted Bundy was executed for engaging in sexual harassment. What the Japanese did to their POWs made even the Nazis blanch. The Japanese routinely beheaded and bayoneted prisoners; forced prisoners to dig their own graves and then buried them alive; amputated prisoners' healthy arms and legs, one by one, for sport; force-fed prisoners dry rice and then filled their stomachs with water until their bowels exploded; and injected them with chemical weapons in order to observe, time and record their death throes before dumping them in mass graves. While only 4 percent of British and American troops captured by German or Italian forces died in captivity, 27 percent of British and American POWs captured by the Japanese died in captivity. Japanese war crimes were so atrocious that even rape was treated as only a secondary war crime in the Tokyo trial, similar to what happens during an R. Kelly trial. The Japanese "water cure" was to "waterboarding" as practiced at Guantanamo what rape at knifepoint is to calling your secretary "honey." The Japanese version of "waterboarding" was to fill the prisoner's stomach with water until his stomach was distended -- and then pound on his stomach, causing the prisoner to vomit. Or they would jam a stick into the prisoner's nose so he could breathe only through his mouth and then pour water in his mouth so he would choke to death. Or they would "waterboard" the prisoner with saltwater, which would kill him. Meanwhile, the alleged "torture" under the Bush administration consists of things like: -- "failing to respect a Serbian national holiday"; or -- "forgetting to wear plastic gloves while handling a Quran." Finding out who started the tall tale about "waterboarding" being treated as a war crime after World War II would take the talents of a forensic historian, someone like Christina Hoff Sommers. After years of hearing the feminist "fact" that emergency room admissions for women beaten by their husbands soared by 40 percent on Super Bowl Sundays, Sommers traced it back to an unsubstantiated rumination erupting from a feminist rap session. But the lunatic claim was passed around with increasing credibility until it ended up being cited as hard fact in The New York Times, The Boston Globe and on "Good Morning America." One of the earliest entries in the "waterboarding as war crimes" myth must be this October 2006 article in The Washington Post, citing a case raised by Sen. Teddy Kennedy -- and heaven knows Kennedy understands the horrors of a near-drowning: "Twenty-one years earlier, in 1947, the United States charged a Japanese officer, Yukio Asano, with war crimes for carrying out another form of waterboarding on a U.S. civilian. The subject was strapped on a stretcher that was tilted so that his feet were in the air and head near the floor, and small amounts of water were poured over his face, leaving him gasping for air until he agreed to talk." Even if that description of what Asano did were true -- and it isn't -- the only relevant word in the entire paragraph is "civilian." Any mistreatment of a civilian is a war crime. So every other part of that paragraph is utterly irrelevant to the treatment of prisoners of war, much less non-uniformed enemy combatants at Guantanamo, who could have been shot on sight under the laws of war. What Americans need to understand is that under liberals' own "laws of war," they will invent apocryphal incidents from history in order to give aid and comfort to America's enemies and to undermine those who kept us safe for the past eight years.

Count me in...this is !@#$ing ridiculous.

NOW do you libs get why the Right said "Good Riddance" to this guy? We took Zell. You got Arlen. Id call that a wash.

Make sure your copy of The Audacity of Mein Hope is clearly visible on your coffee table.

Go to 5:33. One of DD's forgotten Gems. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBBqc-e87PY

If Savage had a sign that says "Behead those who Insult Islam" he would have been welcomed with open arms.

RIP. Godspeed, Captian! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFW-PRNQFXk...feature=related