GG

You're worried about losing a hypothetical pick in '18 at the expense of real help in '17?

Well, he certainly isn't going to fit as smoothly into Buffalo's demographics as the Polish kid.

It's not like trump offered Cruz the Secretary of State job to keep him under close wraps.

Or drafting Travares Tillman

And probably smarter than the other versatile pollack experiment from last summer.

Nothing but more blather. I never said nor do I think Wikileaks are a state sponsored group. They're the latest in a line of cowardly useful idiots who think that the US is a bigger menace to the world than the enlightened eastern societies. They're no different than the anarchists and communists of the late 19th/early 20th centuries who were fighting for the people against the capitalist pigs. They're hypocrites and cowards, who don't have the balls to publish exculpatory materials on anyone but the US & UK. And again I'll ask you the question that you've never answered. What's the end game for the Deep State? Do the factions get a cookie when they win?

He could be that box thing. Not wily enough to be a gekko. Boy has this season gone south in a hurry. Watch this team win the lottery in a middling draft

Buying insurance from that guy is like buying an IBM server

NHL Net crawl just showed Montreal at 6-2 since hiring Julien

Yet that doesn't stop you from jumping to the conclusion that CIA overstepped its legal authority, and it certainly appears that you haven't read it. And if WL people are the ones who have read it, why doesn't the WL press release contain a single item that points to CIA's illegality? WL talks at length at how these are the new tools in CIA's global arsenal, but there isn't a peep about their use against American targets or their use inside the US. But boy, does the press release sounds scary, doesn't it? As would a technical manual of a Howitzer.

No it's not. It's full of conjecture of what the tools can be used for. There's nothing in there that shows how and where the tools were used. Use the same standard where you fluff away the Russia hacks. Show proof that CIA overstepped its boundaries.

Prove it

My guess is that the only option that has been eliminated is a contract restructuring. Too close to free agency for a deal not to be done. Tyrod won't restructure if he doesn't think the team is fully committed, which appears to be the case.

N, all WL has done is disclosed the tools, neither they nor you have disclosed if and how the CIA have used or abused them. Big difference. Hell, even the source who provided the info to WL wasn't definitive in whether CIA violated laws. They just said they want a public debate on whether the CIA should be allowed to use those tools. Yes, I think wet can all benefit from a public debate about classified programs. Let's start with Pats* cheating.

What's with the caps?

Just don't go on vacation this week

It would be easier to think that JWil would be a good substitute for Gillislee if he at least looked competent against third stringers in August or didn't fumble when a breeze hit his helmet.

And yet you haven't shown how ordinary citizens have been affected. All you've done is spread fears of what could happen. Which nobody denies. Yes it could happen in an abstract movie script way. Too bad for you that ordinary people are more concerned about the little encroachments on their liberties and wallets caused by the unseen local bureaucrats, who nobody cares about because people like you like to pretend that the Deep State is a bigger problem. It's not. Not even close. That's why the collective response is a big whoop.

You can always join Greenwald in the Brazilian heaven

This has been the collective response to the leaked hack.

I wonder who else was a master of implying an inference? Since you insist on revisiting the genesis of this thread, you should take stock of how utterly wrong your prognostications have been, and this has been a wonderful exercise of fearmongering. But, what the passage of time is proving is that you've been had by whoever is providing the information to you. Maybe they've been had and have no choice but to double down on the conspiracy. You blame everyone else for holding biases, yet you can't see the contradictions in your theories? Have you ever tried to analyze why these stories started popping up well over a year ago? At that point, Trump was widely seen as a joke with less than a zero chance to win the Presidency. Then who in this Deep State of your was afraid of Hillary Clinton? (The same Deep State that killed JFK Jr to help Hillary a decade prior?) Why did your world suddenly adopt the premise that Hillary would bring the neocons back? What's the motivation? All of this predated Trump and he was a non-event? Who would be threatened at the Deep State if Hillary or any of the GOP candidates became President? If the Deep State truly controlled the Presidency, who were they worried about in January 2016 that would assail their power? The obvious answer is that there was no war in the Deep State, but there was a beginning of Obama's allies planting the seeds to make it difficult for Hillary to undo his "great" legacy. There's no love lost between the two, and no matter who was going to win the White House was going to blow up Obama's horrific foreign policy. It just happened that the Obama lackeys got a wonderful gift with the Trump win, and it will now take longer to clean out the garbage because Trump can't get people confirmed fast enough. This is all you're witnessing - a long overdue clean up of the last 8 years of failure. As to the Wikileaks crap, I view it as yelling fire in a crowded theater. Releasing the tools, without releasing any information of how the tools may have been used illegally is at the very least, reckless. The CIA was doing its job. Color me impressed if Wikileaks proves that it was CIA that killed JFK Jr. Otherwise, they're just peddling in the release of classified information and should be dealt with according to the laws.

Does the program have a tail?

Either you're the 3rd most dense person on this site, or you're a troll. In this very thread, you posited that CIA killed JFK Jr. How else are we supposed to view these posts? Your own words, in this very thread. If you're not suggesting that CIA killed Jr, why are you even bringing it up in a thread about CIA doing really really bad stuff? Yet, everyone else is the liar.

Funny how you accuse everyone else of deflection, when it's an art practiced by you. Again, I wasn't commenting on the release, but commenting on YOUR wacked out take of what the release means. There was a saying on this site a while back that needs to be brought back. THINGS THAT ARE DIFFERENT, ARE NOT THE SAME. It wouldn't even take gatorman level intellect to think that your theories are wacked out. Please explain how CIA killed JFK when they thought he presented an existential risk to them, but haven't killed Assange, when he presents an existential risk to them? Yet, this same CIA has no problem killing JFK Jr for no other reason than to help Hillary run for Senate.

Again, my analysis of the leaked information is irrelevant to your suggestion that the CIA killed JFK Jr to help Hillary's run for Senate. Your words, not mine. Maybe one day you'll see the world clearly. I hope.