dickleyjones

I mean...is the premise here that we should ignore deadly disease? If/when we are hit by something, which is inevitable, we are going to be well and truly *****. And i say that while agreeing that while Covid was quite terrible, our response was mostly terrible.

screw induction! most of my cookware is copper and i don't think it would work with my wok which i use at least once a week.

really too bad, he's one of my favourite Bills to watch play.

I think it is good strategy. Slow roll everything in an attempt to keep the momentum. Drip drip drip. Why do anything before the convention which is a boost itself? Let the other side scream and accuse and then show everyone the screaming and accusing was all for nought. The right is silly to fall into this simple used-countless-times-before trap. The only possible way it helps them is if Harris never releases any policy which is highly unlikely imo.

And the right is equally guilty, just a different set of crappy things and so called virtues. And i believe that's on purpose - divide and conquer.

Yeah they are called Joshallenam Ever since that 4th and 1 vs Dallas my worries have disappeared.

Sure sounds like some fun work. I haven't done much live sound compared to in studio. My live experience has been mostly in the classical world which seems to be a challenge for the regular audio guys as they have a very difficult time marrying acoustic and reinforced sound (in my experience). Anyways, compress the sibilant frequencies too much and you get that unfortunate sound lisp sound.

Trump's lisp magically dissappeared!

huh, i assume the exact opposite.

strategically, she appears to have been correct.

do tell...

the slur sound very much like compression in the high frequencies (the "ess" sound). if he has a lisp then you would likely hear it with other consonants like "th" which we do not. i expect that next time we hear from trump he will sound like he normally does. turn that de-esser down! source: i work in audio

My point is you are all here because you enjoy the fight. I didn't mean you exclusively.

That is pretty damned clever. I think i will steal this idea for myself.

But you do take your shots, knowing they will see them. Because it is fun.

There's a reason: you love it. Nothing wrong with that, everyone should enjoy life. I find it strangely endearing.

Come on. Admit it. You all love it. Americans love to fight! Especially with each other.

I'm a little confused about the "it's AI!" strategy. If it were, in fact, fake, then fine. But there are now many separate videos showing this airport event with a crowd. Seems to me the opposite strategy would be better "let's show them what a huge crowd really is" and i think trump could do it successfully, too. Instead, this just makes you look bad and worse, something to laugh at.

I think he's pretty 😍

i concede that this evidence is much more convincing regarding genetics. i don't think im wrong to delay my judgment. certainly not wrong to condemn personal attacks on Khelif or any of the boxers.

i reject nothing. it is part of the evidence. we know much more than that. for example, that the iba and ioc are at odds over this and much more. and more evidence beyond that. but none of it is proof, just evidence, i think you know those two things are not the same. again, that doesn't mean you are wrong. but it doesn't mean you are right. we do not know the truth.

i don't like or dislike the evidence you presented. it's just some of the picture. certainly you wouldn't suggest all the governing bodies involved are unbiased? there is still zero proof. maybe you are right. maybe you are wrong. we do not know. im starting to think your agenda is so important to you that you are unwilling to admit that.

ok let me try "trisomy 13" there, proven. you now have trisomy 13, im sorry. compelling.

i think there is a good argument why XY is enough of a disqualifier. you may argue that means we get it wrong sometimes but that will always be the case. given that, i would rather err on the side of someone missing out vs the alternative. all that said, it is a tricky issue. it's gonna take a while to get figured out.

again, no proof. and i understand genetics as well as my education could provide, probably better than most. it's one thing to say what you think is true. that's fine. but it is only what you think, not what you know. the attacks on this person are basically "i know this is a man therefore it is wrong" which is a poor argument without proof.