dickleyjones

you mean losing to the pats?

i prefer L'Carpetron

it is the wrong call in a vacuum, yes, i agree. but in the context of the game it may be correct. there were many other 'missed' PI calls yesterday. that's how it goes with judgment calls, the refs set a precedent and hopefully uphold it all game. edit: and to add replay into the mix totally undermines the refs' precedent.

not me! i hope they lose to the pats like we have been losing to the pats for years. share our pain.

once again, i think it matters that other obvious calls were not made. if the game was called really tight all day and then suddenly this play happens and no call, that's bad. but that's not how it went down. as for accountability, since the job requires judgement calls we don't want to complicate things. we don't need the refs thinking "hmm i better call this or i'll be in trouble". we just want them to call the game as straight up as they can.

ok. but maybe some of the missed calls earlier in the game was also not letting them play. shouldn't context matter? it's either that or demand that every single penalty be called which i assume no one wants.

a bad call according to who? that is the problem. the refs were loose yesterday, all game. were they all bad calls? i remember thinking "wow, this is great, they are letting them play rough today!" but suddenly they are supposed to not be loose at the very end? and we want a system that allows us to cherry pick bad calls when context should be considered? i like how it happened yesterday just fine. i'm not sure how bad that call was considering the many no calls for the entire game. i'm not questioning the PI. i'm saying context matters. for example: if the refs let 9 PI calls go uncalled, 6 maybes, 3 obvious, why call the obvious 10th?

i wonder if it was. relatively speaking.

the refs let them play rough. they 'missed' multiple PI calls. why should they call that one and not others?

one can dream. the rest of the nfl can know our pain in the meantime.

i disagree. i don't care about the national nightmare. i want THE BILLS to be the ones to finally destroy them.

got no problem with this. chiefs hype has been arrogant. and i want the bills to be the team to dethrone the *pats.

Bruce, no doubt!

must? nah.

and you know this? amazing!

optics make the best teams.

So you make a judgment based on zero facts, excellent.

because mock drafts are dumb. and mock drafts in december are really dumb.

You assume too much. We don't know the details.

with logic like that, how could i disagree? true = false, hurray! your hyperbole and assumptions do not serve your argument well. i'm talking about your "retarded" post. the one where you said posters say allen does not need to improve.

homer posts? you said there were "he doesn't need to improve" posts. but why stay on topic when you can insult instead.

the ridiculous statement was yours. i simply responded in kind because you have no proof.

haha the irony. nice buzzword btw. try backing up your nonsense with proof instead of whatever this post was supposed to be.

no.

dude, you have to turn up your speakers.