JimBob2232

Interesting: Rob Johnson (Bills Career): 60.4% completion rating Drew Bledsoe (Bills Career): 59.3% completion rating Sacks per start: Rob Johnson: 4.2 Drew Bledsoe: 3.1 TD/Int Ratio Rob Johnson 1.4:1 Drew Bledsoe: 1.2:1 I dont know how to combine QB Ratings, but in the 3 years drew is here 2002: 86.0 (16 games) 2003: 73.0 (16 games) 2004: 70.3 (9 games) RJ: 1998: 102.9 (8 games) 1999: 119.5 (2 games) 2000: 82.2 (11 games) 2001: 76.3 (8 games) Wow...ya know...as much as I am shocked by this...I think I would have to say I woudl rather have RJ.... Amazing stuff

While I am inclined to agree with you, rosie odonnell would look pretty attractive if you set her next to fat anna nicole smith.

I think at this point drew appologists are pretty much gone. I admit to being one at one point, but its WAY PAST TIME now

I would pass on brunell as well, but if all we had to give up was drew, I think we could benefit by the trade. We still have a piss poor backup (3rd string?) qb, but one without the history in buffalo. And besides, the last ex-jaguar quarterback was the savior of our franchi.....oh what? He wasnt? My bad.

We might be able to trade him for brunell. Actually, now that I think about it, that might not be a half bad deal. Clearly both are horrible, and both need new scenery. Brunell could be a decent backup for us, without the history and vice versa. Hmm.....It would sure be one hum-dinger of a deal, thats for sure!

I dont know..Brunell isnt so hot either...

I am going to give it ONE MORE loss befoer I say its over....alot of football left. Though I have to admit, its very very dim at the moment.

Ding Ding Ding.....methinks he shouldnt belong in the NFL.

AHHH MY EARS

I dont know whether to agree or not... On one hand, they have a good team, and went to the superbowl a year ago, and didnt lose much. So one might suspect they could do the same again if healthy and added a #1....However... I dont think Delhomme is the QB to do this. They signed him to a monster deal, and I think he is just a marginal quarterback, maybe in the top half of the league. Also, injuries are often not just a one time thing. with the huge number of injuries suffered this year, i think it is possible some will linger into next season. It should be interesting to watch them though. Just goes to show the great parity in the NFL. Now if only the NFL can ground new england...

First time i have ever seen a game decided with a safety in ot.

Well, the jets without pennington are not a playoff team. I see them falling a bit. Jacksonville is also overrated (though even I predicted playoffs for them), They are 6-3, but they are barely winning most of thier games, and the I suspect the luck will run out eventually. Their PF/PA is 151-163!! Not usually indicitive of a 6-3 record. Either the broncos or the chargers will win the west, leaving the other to fight for a WC. As I see it. EAST: New England NORTH: Pittsburgh SOUTH: Indianapolis WEST: Denver Wildcard: Jets/Jags/Chargers/Ravens I made my case against NYJ and Jax above, now lets look at SD's schedule Kansas city Twice. Indianapolis and Denver. Ouch. And the ravens? Dallas, New England, Giants, Indy and Pittsburgh. Point is, it wont be an easy road for ANY wildcard team. I think 9-7 gets you in. Right now, pittsburgh is our friend. If they keep rolling and win out (except for week 17 when they rest their starters....hopefully), they will have beaten Baltimore, Jets, and Jacksonville, and greatly help our cause, especially if we can beat them. This will be my last post on the playoff issue until after the game tonight, because it is EXTREMELY Premature until we beat NE.

We are 3-5. We have 4 VERY winnable games (SF, Cle, Cin and Mia). Assuming we win all 4 of those games we need 2 more wins to have a chance at the wildcard at 9-7. The remaining 4 games are New England, St. Louis, Pittsburgh and Seattle. Not a cakewalk by any means. With a win tonight, 9-7 is NOT a stretch. We would have then won 4 of our last 5 games, with momentum on our side heading into two tough games against st.louis and seattle. But we really need to win tonight, because taking 2 of 3 from St. Louis/Pittsbutgh and Seattle is a tough road to hoe. Though, with the way pittsburgh is playing, we may get lucky playing them in the last week of the season, as they might have home field advantage (another reason we need to win tonight, to help pittsburgh rest their starters in week 17). But like i said...ALL this goes out the window if we lose tonight. BRING IT BOYS!

The problem is Jennings IS NOT a franchise tackle. This worked with peerless because we created the impression we would be willing to keep him and pay him franchise money. Nobody would think we would be willing to pay jennings money, and thus at some point, have to drop the tag and get nothing in return. Its a big game, one which probably isnt worth playing (and the same reason we didnt tag winfield last year)

No. No you cant Mr. Kerry.

Colorado state #1...that is rough. 18 mil off in 299 sec

I voted for bledsoe! Now wouldnt that be funny lol

They should trade it to us for henry! In todays NFL, sure it looks like thye need alot, but really anything can happen (look at SD!). If they go out and get brees for a 2nd round pick, ricky comes back, boston returns to form and they sure up a few other spots around their team, this team could be good again EVEN WITHOUT a #1 producing. (not to mention the piloli/weis combo being talked about) I would not be suprised intodays NFL.

Me too, except a quick glance at the 2nd round shows little talent. Dennis northcutt, todd pinkston and Jerry Porter are the only real notable names (maybe some OL i havent heard of as well) The 3rd round brought us the likes of erron kenney and dez white. Ruben drogns and Lavernus coles also came from the 3rd. Point is, this draft was VERY VERY weak all around. Sure we had a bad draft, a VERY bad draft, but unless you are baltimore or Seattle (Jamal Lewis and Shaun Alexander respectively), I think you are dissapointd as well. Note: Tom Brady, Tim Rattay and many other solid role guys are late in this draft, but the first 3 rounds produced IMO VERY little talent.

I am not going to show you statistics, but here is the 2000 draft The 1999 draft Just take a look at those 2 drafts..I think 50% looks pretty close

BIIIIIIIIIIIIG mistake for the cable companies. They are already losing out to a superior product and they refuse to get in the game here. I switched to DirecTV, but wouldnt have if cable offered the package. Now that I have switched, i cant imagine going back

Yeah, I picked up a-train, my mistake. Chapman is not available. Thanks for your input, I think thats what I will do.

The bye week bug has bitten hard, and my normal 2 RB starters are on bye. I was fortunate enough to pick up Thomas Jones, but the other RB position is suspect. I still have henry on my roster, but I know he is a bad play this week. Also on my roster is Dorsey Levens, but he isnt suposed to start. Verron Hayes of Pit is available, since staley is out, but bettis is supposed to be the #1 back. Right now im leaning toward levens and hoping westbrook cant go long, anyone got any suggestions?

With drew throwing the ball, I believe we need someone on offense to start batting down some of his throws.

Well, lets examine this 7-2 possibility Should Lose: NE, Pit, Could Win: Jets, Sea and StL Should Win: Miami, Cleveland, Cincinnati, San Fran For the sake of argument, say we beat Mia, Cle, Cin and SF, and we beat the Jets tomorrow. Lets rack up the loss at NE. We are now 7-6, with Pit, Sea and StL left. Its entirely possible pit will be resting some starters that last week of the season. If we play like we are capable of (big stretch i know, but im the eternal optimist), we can beat StL and probably Seattle. 7-2 is a stretch, no doubt, but not as impossible as one would think, but WE have to come out and win those games. Hopefully we can pull it off.