Jump to content

BEAST MODE BABY!

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,566
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BEAST MODE BABY!

  1. Worst. Twitter. Cut and paste. Ever.
  2. I do have a feeling we get a big-name FA. Could be Williams. Could be Jackson. If Williams, could be Williams and then Meachem. In five days, I'll either look prophetic or dumb
  3. We only believe posters who drive BMW 745iL's
  4. Looks like the Skins aren't going to take this laying face down: http://blog.redskins.com/2012/03/12/statement-on-adjusted-salary-cap-reports/
  5. Winston is a zone-blocking RT, and we all know Chan/Nix are looking for the big bruiser types.
  6. Levi Brown graded out as one of the worst tackles in the NFL last year. But yeah, I'm sure Buddy will sign him.
  7. Yup. $30.8 million + 1.6 = $32.4 MILLION dollars
  8. Redskins new cap number (if they take the hit all this year) = -$4.9 MILLION Bills new cap number = $32.4 million Cowboys new cap number = -$5.3 million
  9. The Redskins are going to have a tougher time bringing in VJax with 36 MILLION less in cap space LOL
  10. Totally agree with you. So does Dwight Freeney. /sarcasm. Don't get hung up on prototypical measurements. If the guy can play, he can play. And Robert Mathis is only 6' 2". And that's just two players from one team.
  11. Lesson #8567 in business: Never personally guarantee a loan when you're highly leveraged.
  12. I don't expect BillsVet or Tennesseeboy to post in this thread. It's too uplifting.
  13. I see a most of the negative Nancy's aren't posting in this thread. Positivity is their kryptonite.
  14. This particular regime has only been spinning its tires for 2 years. I think you're projecting 12 years worth of no playoffs onto Buddy Nix. And they added Barnett and Morrison last year. Maybe you didn't like them, but they were FA signings. And Barnett was a damn good one. We had a back-up C in Urbik. And they added Hairston in the draft. Exactly how many offensive linemen do you expect the Bills to carry on their roster?
  15. I have two possible dark horse scenarios. 1) Richardson is still there at 10 and someone wants to trade up with us to grab him. 2) Buddy surprises everybody and takes DeCastro at 10 (Someone mentioned a guard has never been taken that high, but Buddy has taken the BPA the past 2 years with our first pick).
  16. I'm not positive we'll take a LT. We might, but I am not sure. I have been leaning more towards WR, but I have no idea how Nix has them graded. I will say that Bell not being signed increases the chance for a LT. But they can still sign him before the draft. We'll just be competing against other teams.
  17. I really like Upshaw. He has got phenominal instincts. But he isn't an elite pass rusher. I agree with Buddy that someone good will be there in the second. The question is is Courtney Upshaw good enough at 10? If we were still running a 3-4, I think Ingram and Upshaw would merit a lot of consideration at 10. But I am not so sure with a 4-3. Upshaw can set the edge, but can he rush the passer? Ingram can rush the passer, but can he set the edge? I don't think you want those questions at 10. I am beginning to think they may take Floyd at 10. But what the heck do I know? I've heard that Floyd isn't the best route runner. But I've also heard he's a great blocker. And I sure as hell ain't Buddy Nix. But whoever is there at 10, I think we take BPA. We've done that the past 2 years. And we'll do it this year.
  18. As someone else mentioned, the Saints have no first round pick this year.
  19. No. It's always a surprise about who we pick. It's just that no one is surprised when it happens.
  20. That worked well for the Redskins a few years ago. Wait a second...
  21. If Floyd is there, we may take him. Although, besides character/judgement I heard a knock on him is his route running, which Chix values. Martin could be a possibility. But I think the real BPA when we draft will be DeCastro. I know he's not a "need," but neither was Spiller. So, DeCastro is my dark horse. I think we pick up a DE in round 2. Someone will be there.
  22. You're assuming if we did take DeCastro in the 1st that A) we wouldn't pick up a receiver in free agency and B) we wouldn't draft one in rounds 2 through 7. I think both of those are silly assumptions.
  23. People at TBD (including me) say that every year
  24. I don't think moving Levitre to LT makes us better. If anything, the line would be Hairston / Levitre / Wood / DeCastro / Pears. I personally like the DeCastro potential pick because if Wood gets hurt again they can move Urbik to center and not really miss a beat. And I think they resign Bell...just my feeling. Unless they really think something of Mike Jasper. Then the chances of DeCastro are lower.
  25. This is my dark horse for Nix to surprise everyone and take at 10. A Steve Hutchinson clone? TAKE HIM!
×
×
  • Create New...