Tortured Soul

Okay, how's the house hunting?

Atlanta's stadium is 17 years old.

Adultery is still on the books as a felony in some states. http://www.legis.state.wi.us/statutes/Stat0944.pdf

As an ex-journalist, current law student, it would be a better world if sources were liable.

Hey Tim, Any sense that the Bills are reluctant to make long-term commitments to players that fit the Cover 2 system because of the realization that if Jauron is gone after the season, the next coach likely won't want to run the same defense?

Wanna bet?

The guys having sex in my section in 1998 during the Colts game. First time I ever saw live fornication.

Sorry if I missed it, but what is your take on Levi?

According to the numbers, 2 out of 3 times, the entire line did what it was supposed to on Lynch's carries.

Sorry it wasn't clear, but I meant Hangartner's contract was 4/10. The point is, it's not like we're paying so much that he can't be the sixth lineman.

We have five starters right now, so someone has to go to the bench. I'm not so sure. Plus, I saw posted on this board that his contract was only 4/10, so it's not out of the realm.

You wouldn't even consider Hangartner on the bench?

They were a different GM and coach.

"The beauty of the 49ers' draft was getting an extra first-round pick in 2010 (by virtue of a trade with Carolina), when there will be three top quarterbacks and good first-round depth for defensive tackles. The 49ers were hoping cornerback Jairus Byrd was going to fall to them at No. 42. Once he was gone, the 49ers were considering taking center Max Unger. The 49ers have enough to get by on the offensive line. The value of the 2010 first-rounder could outweigh the addition of a good interior offensive lineman." http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...&id=4135040 Setting aside that he meant 43, he implies that the Niners valued Byrd over a first-rounder next year.

Hey Tim, I tried to get this question across to you in the chat (I know, one of hundreds). Are the people that you have spoken to that are concerned about Langston Walker basing it on watching him play, or do you think it's more a matter of a nondescript RT who's pushing 30 being forced to play the left side? I'm no expert, but from watching every Bills game, it seems like he's done a pretty good job playing both sides of the line. He's not a Pro Bowler, but he certainly doesn't seem to be the biggest problem on the team. How concerned would you personally be about him if you were a fan of the team? PS. My comments seem to be sticking now on your blog posts. Maybe it was just me.

To serve as a bridge to Hardy and Johnson. Also to incentivize performing at as high a level as possible for that one year.

If you're concerned about Fitzpatrick's ability to step in, I can understand that. But how would that be remedied with a late-round "groomable" prospect? Wouldn't you prefer someone with four year's experience this season?

I want you to base it on who you have the Bills taking in the sixth round in your 2010 mock.

9-7.

I think Mark clearly won today's round.

I don't think they're as down on McCargo as you are. I think they viewed a large portion of the problem as his relationship with the D Line coach, who has since moved on. McCargo knows what's riding on this season.

Just a heads up ... I've been trying to post comments on your (Bills related) blogs entries since you let us know that your bosses look at those. But roughly a quarter of the time, the comments are removed, even though I can't imagine they come anywhere close to violating the terms of service. I don't know who removes them or if anyone else is having the same problem. Sorry, but I give up.

I think the plan is to have three linebackers on the field less than half the time, which makes it pretty difficult to justify paying big money to the third linebacker.

Have you moved on from brickbreaker?

And they're worried if he can make the "transition" from CB to S?