I couldn't really bear up to staring at him for 8 minutes but what's the point? Being more green, whether or not global warming is a fact, is a good choice? No sh--. I get that. His next step, that it's public policy that will solve the issue (if there is one), is dubious. Public policy is often idiotic on this topic: see ethanol.
Maybe he had another point buried in his obviously academic punnett square.