Jump to content

John Adams

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,398
  • Joined

Everything posted by John Adams

  1. So once it's approved, you're OK with requiring it?
  2. Still working the walker eh gramps? The left position that I became notorious for was that I supported gay marriage before this board realized it would not result in a parade of horribles. Not sure what else you'd say I'm leftist on. President-wise, I've voted for a lot more Rs and Is than Ds. How can we count points for outright lies? Darin was not a post-deleter, nor I suspect was he any fan of Trump. Now, he might have just deleted your posts because you're a tool. I support that kind of moderation with every fiber of my being.
  3. If there's a history of PPP doing good in the world, you'll have to provide evidence. There's an awfully dark underbelly, but we can keep it lite and just say it sucked then and it sucks now. It probably sucks a little less now because SDS drained out one mass poster recently but still. Whoever called me a leftist above can bite me. Biden is the worst.
  4. Oh Jesus. He's going to get linked to this and spooge all over his formerly frozen laptop. Cut it out already. It sucked then too. It was just a circle jerk of insiders. Then there was a secret site of super insiders. Nothing to write home about. Love them all but we were all #######s, and I don't mean that in the "badge of honor" way we used it then. So far this thread is everything I could have hoped. MPPPGA
  5. You just captured my particular panache here. MPPGA.
  6. Says the worm. Go to your safe space. MPPPGA
  7. Everyone here seems to say the board is full of s--tposts. Let's celebrate that. Here's an easy game to play. You're looking for sequences of the last posts in different threads or if you find a particular person starved for loneliness, someone who keeps posting in a thread consecutively with no response. Here's the scoring: Tack-Tac-Toe (3 posts in a row)- 1/0 point* Connect Four (4 posts in a row) - 2/0 points* Five jive (5 in a row) - 3 / 1 * Six-top (6) - 4/2* Seven-up - 5/3 And so on. * notes that the lower point total is what you score for a B-man, Tiberius, or Billstime streak. We don't want to make scoring too easy. You get credit like this, for example from Chef Jim who is one of the more prolific posters here. You post the photo and claim your Tic-Tac-Toe 3 in a row. Congrats you score 1 point. To be clear, the below is worth zero points because it's just the normal s--tpost streak from one of the excluded posters under 5. Other ways of scoring include scoring points off the Posters Who Need a Hug board. This is where posters post more posts on top of their last un-responded to post in the same thread, like this situation where one of our brethren got no response on one post so tried another, and yes, another and yes went to the well 4 times! Give the man a hug and claim 4 points! Sponsored by the Committee to Make PPP Great Again MPPPGA
  8. You said, "They did not storm the gates and bust in.. they were literally let in" That was a disturbed attempt to rewrite what happened to some preferred narrative you'd like to be true. What did the protestors (most were just protestors, only some broke in and vandalized) want to happen on January 6 as they were certifying the election?
  9. Just when I thought posters here couldn't be dumber. I guess the window broke itself and let them in.
  10. Good little modern Republican you are not caring about increasing the size of government. And you too.
  11. Not sure what “my alt” is. Please elaborate. And if you think Rs have not been lowering taxes and increasing spending since Reagan started that cute trick, you’ll have to back it with data, moran.
  12. Unlike you, I don’t have a subscription to the Australian Herald Sun. When you read the whole article, and not just 2 sentences, what does it say? You did read the whole thing right?
  13. Your read on the protest: "I can only speculate that goal was to get the Congress to pump the brakes on certifying the election until a thorough investigation of election irregularities could be conducted." Yeah, that's not at all minimizing what they wanted and what our president was doing. Just a little get together to ask congress to pump the brakes. After 70 losses in court and the president fanning the flames under the constitution. What's the big deal, eh?
  14. I got one. Elected Republicans believe in lowering taxes while increasing spending.
  15. Your inability to criticize people who protested democracy is adorbs. Remember when our sitting president called the GA election board chair and said he just wanted to find 11,780 votes. That guy is a definite friend of the constitution. Totally no big deal.
  16. Your inability to criticize people who protested democracy is adorbs.
  17. I have no side of the aisle dogbert. The Dems had their own moment in the sun trying to undermine an election. You’re spending a lot of time defending people who protested a democratic election for someone who claims to support our constitutional republic.
  18. Who even cares about elections anyways? I am sure all of you on the right would be fine if the Biden administration was calling election officials, pressuring them to not steal elections, going 0-70 in lawsuits, and totally cool if protestors stormed the capital. GOP 2024: Democracy shemocracy.
  19. It’s cute that you don’t care that a large portion of the country, including the president, tried to overturn the results of a Democratic election. Adorable really. Whataboutism coming in 3…2…
  20. Are you implying that B-man uses bad sources to spam this board. Get. Out.
  21. Yeah the people who broke into the Capital were there just trying to have a nice civil dialog about election law changes. No big deal. Yeah the people who broke into the Capital were there just trying to have a nice civil dialog about election law changes. No big deal. Yeah the people who broke into the Capital were there just trying to have a nice civil dialog about election law changes. No big deal.
  22. Yeah but you didn’t answer honestly and you know it.
  23. Bahahahahaha. How’d they work that into a chant on Jan 6? Do you remember the old “2-4-6-8, we believe in democracy after 65 failed lawsuits but slow down the count need a word that rhymes with eight.” Be honest. That’s not what they were saying by protesting. It’s pretty well documented what they were chanting and the signs they were carrying. They wanted to overthrow the electoral process and the president lead the charge with eyes wide open.
  24. None of the cultists can touch this question honestly.
×
×
  • Create New...