Jump to content

ndirish1978

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,207
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Fields

  • Location
    MD

Recent Profile Visitors

5,223 profile views

ndirish1978's Achievements

All Pro

All Pro (7/8)

3.3k

Reputation

  1. Traded away next year's first and a couple picks to move all the way up for Carter. Left us with only 6 picks but managed to get all the positions I saw a need for
  2. Trey Amos should be there at 30, I think he's a 1st rd CB. If they want to stick at 30 and pick him I'm ok with that, but I'd be happy to trade back and pick up Porter, Hairston or Thomas and recover a 3rd we could spend on a WR.
  3. No idea who he's talking about. I presum Desmond Watson, who I think is a UDFA
  4. You talking about Deone Walker? I'm not a big fan of taking him where he's graded. He should be a rd 5+ pick.
  5. I would like to trade out of Rd 1 to pick up a third then draft a CB with our first pick, then draft Edge and DT with our second rd picks. Take Kyle Williams or Royals in the 3rd. After that they can do whatever they want. I would also like to double dip at both DT and CB because we don't have depth at those positions that I'm willing to bank on.
  6. A lot of these draft services just have people hanging around way longer than they should. I very much doubt Landon Jackson, Tyliek or Amos are going to be there in rd 2 for us without a trade up. I see some drafts with us getting Grant and then one of these other guys in the second. I would love that but I think all of those players will be gone by 50.
  7. Depends on the type of 1-tech. Some offer pass-rush and others are just space-eaters. Grant is a 1-tech with great lateral range who has pass-rushing upside, which cannot be said for a lot of the other 1-techs in the draft. I think he offers more than the other guys and he and Harmon are probably the only 2 1-techs i would take in the 1st. That said, I don't think another 1-tech like Collins is a worthy pick in the 2nd compared to someone like Farmer in the 3rd. We should be looking at another position with this pick, the board fell in a crappy nightmare scenario value-wise. I would trade back if this were how the board fell to us to pick up more ammo for a trade up to the 3rd.
  8. This suggestion makes no sense and is completely irresponsible
  9. Dane Jackson's contract doesn't guarantee him a roster spot. Might be better to sign Rasul and Dane and draft 2 rookies and just let them all duke it out for a roster spot. Rasul wasnt re-signed IMO because he overestimated his worth. If he drops his salary demands and signs for closer to min it's doable.
×
×
  • Create New...