MadBuffaloDisease

Oh yeah baby! Slap that FP tag on Edge, and make the market even BETTER for Travis! Me likely, and it keeps Edge away from the Dols, without them giving up a ton in picks in money.

Get a Sirius radio with it.

Exactly. He's not going anywhere and will only get better/smarter. Luckily he got away with it, but he won't be doing THAT again.

The center he went against was a long snapper (Brad St. Louis) who goes 247#. For punt and FG blocking where he'd be going against long-snappers I'd say great, but as a regular DT, I'm sure he'd have a little more trouble.

I thought that with Bengals LDE Duane Clemons being out, there would be less of a pass-rush. Turns out his replacement, Carl Powell, got 2 sacks, which is 30% of the sacks that Clemons had on the season. Combine that with the lack of a running game, and I wasn't too happy with MW yesterday. However someone mentioned that he was coming off an injury, so I'll wait until the Pgh to make further comment.

GW was holding him back (as per Gray in an interview in the off-season) AND he has better/more experienced players.

Gee, what a shock! Josh "Slappy" Brolin and Diane "You Give Love, A Bad Name" Lane. Marriage number three for each, coming up!

I assume you told her BEFORE you knew it was his daughter? I also assume you didn't get any.

No, it's obvious he has NO clue about the game of football. Brady is a part of them winning, but he's far the the main reason they win. Again look at 2002.

The Pats had a commanding lead and were going to ADD to it until Brady threw that mind-bogglingly dumb INT. After that the Panthers were in full catch-up mode and ran out of time, and field with Kasay's kickoff OOB. I'd dare say however that Manning would have EASILY beaten the Rams in that SB with the way the Pats' defense was playing. Like I've told you a million times, Brady NEEDS a great defense to even make the playoffs, much less win the SB. He also need Viniatieri's foot to win playoff games.

The Bengals' "brutally defeated team" is STILL better than the 49'ers. Like I said, dress Willis and Travis, but don't play them unless it's absolutely necessary.

The point still stands and thanks for making it for me. Manning doesn't play defense, and neither does Brady.

And to think, no help from the refs. Go figure.

It's okay TH. You can admit that Manning is a better QB than Brady. Save the "SB winner and SB MVP" talk, because without Brady's defense, ST's (namely Vinatieri) and coaching, he'd have ZERO rings.

That's right. But as I mentioned, the Bills had a good lead when RJ went out and Flutie blew the save. Then they got their 1st win against the 49'ers the following week with RJ starting. Then RJ got injured early in the Colts game and the rest was history.

No, the Bills lost their first 2 games and then won the 3rd over SF with RJ at the helm. And in the 2nd game, against the Rams, the Bills had a comfortable lead when RJ went out with (what else) an injury, and Flutie failed to do ANYTHING with the offense. And IIRC, that "naked bootleg" against Jax was a busted play by Thurman. BTW, when was the last time they won 6 in a row?

Or dress him but don't play him unless you need him. Same goes for Travis if he's not 100%,

That's got to be the record for TD's by ST's.

Looks like you're right. I hadn't noticed that before.

Actually just 1 would do it.

...and some wings. Extra hot!

Losman wasn't even active today (what's up with that?).

Doesn't he have the Bills' rookie record for TD's?

Seems that way. To some the Bills should have scored 243 points these past 5 games.

"Low quality" wins.