Mark Long Beach

Yes I'd be upset. While I don't think that he's the greatest LB, he's definitely in the serviceable to solid category. We have no one to replace him other than a 3rd round rookie... If we had Patrick Willis to replace him I'd be saying "Thanks for all your hard work Poz, see you later." Don't create an necessary hole. We have enough of them already.

While I don't have high hopes for either of those two, I have very high hopes for Eric Wood, Andy Levitre & J Byrd. Three high quality starters out of a draft is not bad at all.

Lol! Close. I actually think PdadDy has got most of the details & reality right. I just really disagree with his interpretation of them. Oh, and I guess his unwillingness to see that other peoples points-of-view have any validity. The closest analogy to player drafting & FA market is to a poker tourney. It's all a series of gambles. Some of them are BIG gambles and some are small ones. Hoping to win more than you lose. IF you win a big pot (great player) it can make up for a whole lot of little ones that you lose. Similarly if you win enough little ones it can make up for a big one that you lose. Just like in poker, the best don't always win. The best poker players get bumped off all the time. However they regularly (over time) do a whole lot better than the rest. Same in football player management. Scott Pioli & Bill Polian consistantly got better players for their teams than Matt Millen. While Millen is an easy target, the 29 or so other GM's did varying degrees of worse and occasionally better than both of them. But over time, they've done better than almost everyone else. I'm not worried about one individual gamble. Especially one that I think has high reward potential. We hit on Merriman it makes up for a lot of Erik Greens.

Several points: 1> quantifying risk by assigning a percentage like you've suggested can be a useful tool. But it is only one of MANY tools used to analyze decisions involving risk (financial or otherwise). The first half of my life I've been an engineer and the second half a CFO. In both careers assigning a percentage risk has actually been one of the least useful tools. 2> Why are you insisting that any of US, as enthusiastic fans do this quantifying. A drunken Tibetan monk has only a little less information than we do about S. Merriman. I've never interviewed him, seen him work out, barely watched him play, don't have a history with him, haven't talked to his doctor much less had my _employed_ doctor see and evaluate him. Buddy Nix has ALL of these things and more. Plus what, 50 odd years of evaluating football players? I'd much rather believe his view of risk than yours. Nix clearly feels it was worth the risk. 3> IMO you are overstating the reward we can get from other players we could take instead. If you look at the number of pro-bowl players who go to new teams via free-agency the number of them who contribute at that high level is vanishingly small. For every Reggie White, there are dozens players who don't live up to that billing, such as Albert Hainsworth, Hershel Walker, Derrick Dockery (WAY overpaid/overvalued). 4> Similarly there are very few high impact players who change zip code. We might have gotten one. THAT'S HUGE. IMO you vastly underestimate how good it is to sign an impact player, vs a placeholder. 5> IMO you overvalue $2.5 million. You have a chance at getting a better player by paying more money. But 2.5 mil is a small number relative to high impact/expensive players. For example we paid $5 mil for Cornell Green to be our Right Tackle. We got less value than Erik Pears who we paid $1.5 mil for. This I agree with, except the undefined part. I just don't know what it is.

I really, REALLY disagree with this statement. You MIGHT get a better player for that $1-2.5 mil. (key word might) But you almost certainly won't get a difference maker. This is why many of us are completely at peace with the Merriman signing. Sure it's money that could be invested elsewhere, but the amount is relatively small compared to the likelyhood of finding a stud player. $2.5m invested in Merriman is more likely to find a stud than 2.5m towards another player. Yes it means we could offer $5.5 mil instead of 3mil to a free agent. The difference between a 3mil & a 5.5mil free agent player will not find a STUD player vs a roster spot holder. With Merriman it might. How likely? What percentage? Who knows. But SM has shown that he can be one of the better players in the league. If his body holds together, he might be again. That's a good gamble for a mere 2.5 mil.

Everyone agrees that the signing Merriman involves some risk that we pay him and get nothing out of him (like last year). So all we're arguing over is HOW much of a risk it is. Bucky Brooks seems to think that it's a desperate move. I disagree. We can only fix so many things at once, and all player signings are risks. Merriman has shown that he is a rare player capable of changing the game. We have few such playmakers on our team. Very rare are these players and so I feel that the risk of a couple million is a very small risk. The biggest risk to me is that he takes a roster spot but I feel he isn't holding back development of our young players (too young, too raw, too unproven still). Yes we could add that 2.5 mil onto another contract to try for a slightly better player. However, I feel that that level of player is STILL not that good. Zack Miller is a good TE. He is not a game-changer. He will go for more money than we would pay for even with the extra 2.5 mil we would have 'saved' by not signing Merriman. Give me a gamechanger over another decent player any day. There really aren't many high impact players out there. They are expensive and high risk as well-Haynesworth anyone? Personally, I don't think it likely that he'll be a probowler again. But even Takeo Spikes has come back from some devastating injuries and is a pretty good player (although it took a few years).

Vick was the number 1 pick of the draft. I like Vick and think he's got real talent. Now that he's applied himself instead of just relying on his physical gifts I think that his passing will be quite good. He reminds me a lot of Randall Cunningham who was a running QB but by the end of his career he had a real nice touch. Especially on the deeper balls. They were beautiful to watch. Reid is pretty good coach and runs a good offensive system. Vick will take advantage of that.

Oh yes. But I wouldn't cry about keeping Ayodele to battle for a backup ILB with Batten, White et al. We're not deep at ILB at all. With luck, White turns out to be a player. I think Ayodele is below average, but as a 10 year veteran you know what you'll get from him, including effort. You never know beforehand about a rookie.

I really enjoyed DeHaven's part. He did a better job explaining a little more of the purpose of the play and what actually happened during it. Especially nice to see the high endzone view of the plays. You so rarely see that during the broadcast returns.

Absolutely. Essentially they've told us that a deal will get done and there will be a full season. Human nature and negotiating tactics mean that it won't be done until the deadline. We're near the deadline and lo and behold, a deal is imminent. Everything in the last couple months has been preparation for the agreement now. If they didn't have all the previous work it'd be much harder to do a last minute deal because of the complexity of it all. Before then it was all posturing and grand-standing. Fear not, football is coming.

Agree. I like seeing some first hand accounts and help make my own impression instead of solely relying on some writer. I've seen what good writing can do. What comes out doesn't necessarily resemble reality. So it's nice to have a first hand look at the people doing the work (coaches evaluating the players). Now I can see for myself.

Agreed that cherry-picking a few good plays doesn't mean much. But remember football is a game talent and teamwork. Our talent got worse through the year with some injuries, but our teamwork got a LOT better by the end of the season. It gives me some hope that our coaches can get everyone working together. We still need some better talent than last year, but hopefully with a good draft and more development of our young players we can get that too.

I really enjoy these segments and I'm glad that they do them. It's great to get to hear the coaches themselves. I've always thought that Andra's injury really hurt us in for the year. I know that we still didn't play well early but we that's what learning a new system can do. We played the 3-4 much better by the end of the season, but we didn't have as much talent due to injury. I was very excited by both Dwan & Andra's signing. I believe that they will both open our season as starters and hopefully can stay injury free. After our brutal start to the season 0-8 we finished 4-4 and pushed very good teams to the limit during that span (Balt & Pitt). Even with some significant injuries that really showed our lack of depth. (LB & ROT) On the other hand injuries showed our surprisingly good depth at WR which was a major question mark at the beginning of the season. Our young WR's showed pretty nicely and if they continue to develop could be pretty great. We've got a lot of young LBs in Moats, Batten & White. All three of them I think have some real potential. Having Merriman & Davis back as starters will significantly improve our LB corp IMO.

For what it's worth, Ralphy-boy is a part owner of my company. (through the Venture Capitalists) To bad we're not doing so well for him. The VC's are doing okay though.

I like your dream as well!

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/28008/free-agency-in-the-east-tight-ends Not a bad little summary. I want a Tight end who's at least a good to very good blocker and good to very good receiver. I'd rather have that then one who's just a very good/elite receiver. From what I understand, an elite receiving TE comes at the expense of the receiving corp as there are still only so many balls being thrown per game. I think we have a good young set of receivers. For the first time in a long time I really like them and have high expectations of them getting better. We also have a much harder time protecting our QB. Fitz does a good job helping them out, but the OL is still not a strength of our team. So I'd rather have help with a very good blocking TE who can also relieve pressure by making the defense account for his receiving skills as well. To me, Boss or Miller fit that description well. Here's a description of Miller from year before: That's what I want. No more one dimensional TE's please.

Thanks for your write-up and interpretations! It was good and appreciated.

We do... We do.

In the comments someone noted that the stripe is the same as on the invitation to the uniform party: Which I think is a Nice touch. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2730/5785993841_46cf2f316f.jpg

yes, and the opportunity cost of using that money elsewhere.

I think it's just frustration speaking. We're all sad that we drafted a big-time boom or bust prospect who is doing an amazing impression of a bust. Not that I condone it, but some people can't keep their vitriol inside.

A pretty reasonable answer for this. I don't know if it'll account for the (estimated) $100m+ estimated debt, but it absolutely could. Remember signing bonuses were one of the ways that Snyder was abusing the salary cap limitation. Giving large amounts of hard cash up front as opposed to promises in future years. But you need a boatload of cash to do this. Ralph doesn't have that kind of $cash$ to burn.

Rarely does a post make me laugh out loud as much as this one did. Well done! Especially appreciated after a rough day.

Also, other teams will run a similar scheme to some of our preseason opponents. It's good to understand that scheme (even though it's likely a pretty vanilla version of it) so that you can test a couple things out with your players to see how they'll work for the future.

Well Spiller's out-performed McGahee for his first year.