Crap Throwing Monkey

The steaks are overrated. Did you see their 40 times? And they scored zero on their Wonderlic tests (better than meazza, but still...)

Y'know, it never hit me before: How hard working could she have been, to ask people to find her a web site?

Maybe a new rule: anyone who starts more than one thread on one topic in one day gets a time-out for the rest of the day. Now shut up and eat your soup, keggy-poo.

And I'll bet you're jealous that everyone but you...ah, never mind.

Shut up, Joe. Hey, doesn't anyone have any Eric Moulds rumors to dissect to no end today?

He gave her a couple of shriveled raisins, she believed him. Who wouldn't?

You'll have to ask his fiancee for them; she keeps them in a mason jar on her desk.

Wouldn't that make me ieatcrayonz?

Oh, wait...you were serious, weren't you?

Shut up, Ed.

You're still a pansy, though. Yeah, yeah...I know..."Well, who's the one that owns three cats?" They think you're a pansy, too.

It depends. Some things - critical biosensors, for example, are designed to give lots of false positives because they err on the side of caution (i.e. if a biosensor thinks it might detect a bioterrorism agent, it raises the alarm, because the alternative - a false negative - is a hell of a lot worse than all the false positives you can imagine). That makes a biosensor well suited for what it's supposed to do - sense bioweapons releases; but if you instead tried to use it as a medical diagnostic tool...well, then it would suck. But as they're used, 90% false positives is pretty damned good. UAV's for border patrol...could be pretty much the same thing. A "false alarm" might be a "good" thing in the context. Or it might not. It sure as sh-- isn't a measure of reliability on its own, though.

AAAAAUGH! MY EYES! Change of plans: I'm off to go frolic in the Knightley...

I don't know that he literally gives head...but he does suck, blow, and is an idiot.

Maybe. Something came over the fax machine this morning...but I couldn't reach it.

Not very well, though. He's enthusiastic, but not very talented... Wait...what?

What, I'm VABills now? Oh, well. Guess I'm off to go frolic in the shire, then...

31.24%???? I honestly thought that was illegal; I thought they were legally required to keep it below 27 or something. Hell, I know loan sharks that charge less than that.

Fine. Shut up, Dexter.

Shut up, Joe.

Oh. Well, in that case, I know it's you, lying B word that you are.

The credit card industry doesn't help much, either. One of the reasons I dropped Providian is that they sent me $40k of preprinted "courtesy" checks on a $5k credit limit...as though to say "PLEASE...go over your credit limit and pay us the fees!" I could easily see people getting those and spending them all the way to bankruptcy court out of sheer ignorance. And then there's the company that raised the credit limit on my Visa to $1 million (yes, that's right, a million dollar limit on a credit card) despite my protests. "Tough. We're giving you a million dollar limit." Interest alone would have been $160k/year. I kept it that way for a month, just to get the statement showing the limit, then told them "Okay, now lower it down to something sane."

Ain't that the truth.

Morons. "How is this going to affect the health and safety of Nevada residents???" Well...considering it's basically just a big-ass stick of dynamite...

Can't be. Someone creates a single username to represent themselves...then posts all this stupid sh--? Okay...maybe it can be. But I doubt it. I think ieatcrayonz is SDS, actually...