From his point of view, it probably did. The things that CENTCOM was supposed to do, they generally did well. But certain aspects of operations - regime change in Iraq, for example - are arguably not in CENTCOM's purview. Should Franks and CENTCOM be held responsible for the !@#$ed up post-war occupation plan that had? Or just for the excellent invasion plan?
Open question, I think. I feel CENTCOM shouldn't take too much blame, if any, for post-war conditions (though I reserve the right to change my mind. ) Others would obviously disagree with me...which is fine, if they can do so intelligently with an understanding of issues that runs deeper than "Well, Bernstein told me so..."