OnTheRocks

if there were no God...there would be no Natalia!

the problem with Kendra will be the interview process...she does have brilliant ideas...but she is not a good communicator. (and neither is Craig). If Kendra had any fire in her belly, she would have mad the Donald well aware of the fact she was the sole contributor to the the Solstice Task as well as the T-Shirt Task....but she just sat their like a lump and let her mates take full credit. Unfortunately when you win, you don't get much of an opportunity to talk about "why you won". It's only when they lose they have to talk about "why they lost". I think Tanna will score very well with the Interview procsess unless she comes across as annoying the way AMY did in season one. In season one, Amy was the bright shinning star and came off flat and unbareable in the interview process. Last night Tanna lost points with me because she flat out lied when she said Alex was "thee" Marketing person for the task. And she never made that clear when they were working the project. What is always fun on this show is the last week when the two finalists have to motivate the losers to come back and work for them. That is a true sign of leadership. I think it would be really interesting if lets say Kendra and Tanna are the finalists and Craig somehow ends up on Kendra's team. Kendra would be wise to fire him before they leave the boardroom.

eehhh...whatevah.

funny you would say that....about 4 weeks ago....i finally noticed them...and couldn't believe how nice they looked!

Looks like a combination between Ed Grimsley.... and Pee Wee Herman doing the Tequila Dance.

Trump Fired Alex

Last night was quite the decision. Tanna poor leadership with no marketing vs. Alex with a bad W-L record. Personally I think Tanna is the best candidate and thought it would come down between her and Bren. The chick that worked with Greg...is a nutcase....but she has come up with all of the ideas that made her team successful the last couple of weeks. It will be interesting to see how Greg interviews with Trumps executives. Anyway....just thought i would chime in on a program that has been pretty lame....but i have stuck with it.

i can't believe Carl hasn't clutched his chest one last time yet.

i am not a fan of Rush....he is ok...but i don't listen to his program.... did i miss something? where in the article does it say he is going to prison?

what's next? Carrie Underwood arrested for involvement in a Transvestite Prostitution ring?

ok....here's a question.....what kind of logistical nightmares would there be if there were annual elections on such topics as: Abortion Death Penalty Legalization of pot Gay Marriage I had a few people tell me that no one knows what the American People want based on who is in the White House...and who controls the Senate or Congress. Why not have a core group of items and send it to the American public once annually. I am not saying, each of these items go on the ballot each year. Maybe one item lets say Gay Marriage goes on the ballot once every 5 to 10 years. And whichever way the people vote....so goes the law of the land.

This is a prime example of the Dem party not learning from their past mistakes. And another reason the further they move to the left...the more they find themselves at the short end of the polling booth.

I think Constantine made Paula Muhammed moist.

this probably belongs in an active thread....so sorry for not taking the time to find a place to put this. I have been watching some of the Cable News programs lately as this Fillabuster debate heats up. Last night I flipped between Hardball, Scarbourough Country, and a couple of the Fox News programs. Why do Liberals continue to say, "The American people do not want the conservative Republican agenda forced down their throats." Who do they think put those people in office? Much to their dismay, the French and the Canadians and the Germans do not vote for the men and women serving in the US Congress and Senate......American People do. SO why do they continue to presume what the American people do or do not want? I actually have no problem with a Fillabuster ...although, my preference would be to see these clowns keep their mouths shut and vote "yeah or neah". If anything....those (and they are not all democrats) that support the Fillabusters are the ones forcing their agenda down the throats of America by not allowing a vote. Norman Lear was on Hardball the other night....and he made one incoherent comment after another. Thoughts?

this is something i am quite concerned about. Mularkey keeps saying all these "new" things they can do now that they have a mobile QB. Well how much new stuff do they plan to jam down the throat of a (for all practical purposes) a rookie QB? I can just see a lot of chaos....before they realize they have to dumb down the playbook. AGAIN. The other thing I worry about is one of the criticisms of Mularkey in Pittsburgh was he had a tendancy to run too many trick plays. I sense from the comments he has made that he is beside himself because of the trick plays he and Clemments are drawing up. I hate trick plays. Maybe one every two or three games is one thing....but I don't want to see one per series. sorry StuckinCincy...I know that doesn't answer the question....but, I had to get this off my chest.

I am back on the Savol Band Wagon! I am rooting for him to finish second...i think it would be a joke if Vonzell loses.

i think it comes down to the guy that has the highest cap value. i don't know who that is...but i am guessing Reed. regardless...i think this is Moulds last year with the team. does anyone have the cap ramifications of cutting or keeping Moulds after this season?

I generally like TD. He isn't close to the level of Bill Polian...but I would take him over John "Blank Check" Butler. (RIP)

ch19079's avatar picture is the best NFL Photo I have seen in years.

http://members.aol.com/matt999h/beer.htm

Just because you go to bed with a hottie..... 99 Bottles of Beer on the wall.... .....you might wake up next to who knows what.

Relentless (#1) Is the best Bills History book evah. As far as player bio....Fred Smerlas book...(can't remember the title) was very entertaining. "By a Nose" maybe?

I am a Bills fan geek. I love to read stuff like that.