Tenhigh

It was windy. To be fair, you are REALLY negative. .

You did it! HCQ AND Ivermectin! Congrats Sec!

Ohhhhh, now I get it. Deep down it's mean old Trump that brings this out in you. Rest assured, he's not in the White House anymore. It's gonna be ok.

PM me your venmo handle No, I don't hate much, but I see it a lot. You should honestly go back and look at some of the stuff you've posted and ask yourself if you would consider it hateful if your were on the other end.

I dunno. There was extension, and I don't think he catches it without it. And if they are calling multiple holds on the Cowboys the previous drive, they should call that OPI.

Do you think he catches that pass without the pushoff?

Just own it man, it'll make you feel a lot better.

Go back and read your posts, it's pretty clear man.

What a wildly inaccurate image you have. The only thing you got right is the whiskey, and that was from when I created this handle over 20 years ago. In my defense, I was poor and Tenhigh used to be good well bourbon for the price. Now it's not even bourbon anymore, but I still like the name. But regardless, if it makes you feel better about yourself to try and belittle me, have at it. And why do you hate repurposed medicines so much? Ivermectin seems like it may have some real benefits to Covid patients: https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Poor guy, you must be so terribly lonely. If you ever decide you want to try and make some friends, I'll try and help you.

I am here for you when you are ready. And don't be afraid of fonts, I promise they can't hurt you, I got your back!

Let's take a test, $5 to the winner at the opener: BillStime is to TRUMP as SectionC3 is to _______.

You'll have to store your hot plate on top of the mini-fridge.

Actually, he was born in Austria in 1889 and moved to Germany in 1913. He served in WW1, and then joined the German Workers party, which became the Nazi party. He mostly lived in Berlin and Munich after WW1. But you do you, Bluto.

I was going to make a joke about spitting your mom's basement into TWO rooms, but I am trying to be nicer today.

Come on big guy, let's hug it out. Life is too short.

And that offer for a hug will remain open. Someday you will see that you shouldn't hate someone because they have a different opinion than you, and maybe the hug will seem a little less scary.

So the links I posted showing promise for HCQ to fight Covid from multiple real sources weren't enough for you to stop being such a d bag on the topic? Are you sure it's not just that you hate Doc? Cause it sure seems that way.

I am not, actually. My opinion is that it's a woman's right to choose, but I respect those that disagree on the topic. If I felt the way they do about conception I'd be in their camp, but I don't so I'm not. Back to the topic at hand, here is where you can sign up to help, Tibs: https://www.roomforrefugees.com/

Good point. Have you considered volunteering your home for refugees?

I feel like you could use a hug. I'll be at the opener if you want to hug it out. We're all people at the end of the day, and no matter how strong your opinion is, this this isn't your job.

@SDS, I nominate @Doc.

Here are some articles from a simple. You should probably reconsider calling ANYONE an internet fool. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7102549/ Conclusion Despite its small sample size, our survey shows that hydroxychloroquine treatment is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin. https://www.rcpjournals.org/content/clinmedicine/20/3/278 Wang et al carried out a study investigating the antiviral effects on SARS-CoV-2 of several drugs, some of which had previously been used against SARS or MERS. These included ribavirin, penciclovir, nitazonanide, nafamostat, remdesivir and favipiravir as well as chloroquine. These compounds were tested against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, to assess the cytotoxicity, virus yield and infection rates. They found that chloroquine was effective at reducing viral yield in cell supernatant and additionally did so when the cells were treated 1 hour before infection as well as 2 hours post infection.22 Further investigation by this group focused on the antiviral effects of hydroxychloroquine, as this is a more widely utilised and better tolerated chloroquine derivative. They found that hydroxychloroquine was similarly effective at inhibiting viral infection both before and after viral entry.20 Yao et al found that both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine reduced viral replication of SARS-CoV-2 in a dose-dependent manner, but the EC50 values for hydroxychloroquine were lower than those for chloroquine, suggesting that hydroxychloroquine was more efficacious. In addition hydroxychloroquine was a more potent antiviral than chloroquine when the cells were pre-treated with the drug before viral infection.23 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32373993/ Results: For this study, we identified a total of 09 published articles: 03 clinical trials with sample size 150; 03 in vitro studies and 03 expert consensus reports. These studies were all suggestive that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine can successfully treat COVID-19 infections. We found that COVID-19 infections are highly pandemic in countries where malaria is least pandemic and are least pandemic in nations where malaria is highly pandemic. Conclusions: Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have antiviral characteristics in vitro. The findings support the hypothesis that these drugs have efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19. People are currently using these drugs for malaria. It is reasonable, given the hypothetical benefit of these two drugs, that they are now being tested in clinical trials to assess their effectiveness to combat this global health crisis.

Actually I recall quite a bit of documentation from credible sources talking about the possibility of HCQ being a viable treatment for Covid. In vitro it showed a lot of antiviral properties, and at the time it was as close as we had for a treatment for a GLOBAL PANDEMIC. Your "false narrative" claim is ironically a false narrative in and of itself, and essentially just Monday morning quarterbacking. There was nothing saying that it was a snake oil solution at any time. It's an effective drug with several uses, unfortunately clinically Covid 19 treatment doesn't seem to be one of them. For the record, I have never heard Doc tell anyone they shouldn't wear a mask or get vaccinated. And if stalking a guy around a message board with the same attack several times a day doesn't quantify as douchbaggery to you, you may want to reconsider your position.

What is your argument exactly, that HCQ (with or without Azithromycin) was not ever considered a viable treatment? Or that the medical community shouldn't try to leverage existing drugs to treat new conditions? Its hard to really understand why your being so douchy, other than the fact that you clearly hate Doc.