Tenhigh

Touche. Still, I have a feeling if we met at a tailgate @redtail hawk wouldn't be an asshat, or call me a fascist cult member.

I think most of this is just you being intentionally oblivious to your political party's/press exploitation of some riled up idiots. But you are obviously entitled to your own opinion. But let me add a backhanded compliment, you are the closest thing we have to a rational D on this side of the board, at least to my knowledge.

Nazis in any form are bad, don't be an imbecile. But are you implying these dipshlts running around today are as dangerous as the Third Reich?

He is trying to say that since no one was hospitalized with heat stroke during the Dolphins game we should just ignore the unsafe conditions.

.....allows players to get open for reasons other than the QB had to scramble out of a collapsed pocket.

Wait, are you saying that heat stroke isn't dangerous?

I plan to start a go fund me to put this part on a billboard outside of OBD.

You know it sucked as well as I do. Terrible lip syncing, no guest stars and albino oompa loompas. Why bother dying on this particular hill of opinion?

They want that because it's what should happen. GNR, AC/DC, Aerosmith, Foo Fighters (for the kids), repeat. Isn't it supposed to be for everyone?

Hi fellas, uncle 10hi here after having way too much to drink, ! I thought we could take a bit of a detente in insulting each other on this holiest of super bowl weekends and each take a few minutes to recommend some tunes or other media for our fellow partisan hacks to enjoy. My recommendation is a documentary called Heartworn Highways. Pretty amazing stuff and the accompanying vinyl is 180 grqms is pure awesomeness! Take it, leave it or do whatever you want with it. I think most of you dipshlts are honest folks and I appreciate you, whether we agree or not!

Please stay out of this thread, if we can keep Billsy here he may take fewer dumps in real threads. Plus you don't want to get sticky in his "line of fire".

I understand both the cap and problems with the entitlement, apparently my issue today is communicating my point.

"Earners making minimum wage pay SS tax those over $160,200 pay zero SS tax , sounds fair right ? " To me that is implying that earners who make over 162k pay ZERO into ss, as opposed to 6.2% on tax up to 160k. But maybe I read it wrong. Regardless, it needs a real fix.

That's not how it read.

Earners making over 160k pay 6.2% ss tax on their 160k, not zero. Because when they eventually draw they have a cap on their benefits. Is your argument that they should be paying more in?

Come on Alf. Be better. Musk gave Ukraine free internet to help prevent a humanitarian crisis, not to kill Russians.

Wasn't Starlink a gift to the Ukrainians to help their people get information and communicate internally with the rest of the world after the war started? That the company doesn't want it to be ised for drone strikes seems reasonable to me.

You don't have to catch it with your mouth.

It's gross, both sides do it.

The model isn't working, payroll taxes aren't covering the entitlement benefits being paid. I believe I read that it will be insolvent in less that 15 years, at the current rate. Ignoring this or demonizing folks who want to address it doesn’t fix the problem.

Do monkeys throw feces at you whenever you go to the zoo?

Wee Virginia doves?

It shouldn't matter but it does. Social media has a stranglehold on the American people, it's like digital heroin, especiallyto people under 40. So scumbag politicians are drawn there like moths to a bonfire. And for the record I don't watch OAN. From what little I've seen it's heavy on partisan nonsense. But I also see a lot of partisan nonsense on CNN, just with more subtlety and higher production values.

You almost have it, but I think you are confusing who is doing the actual censoring here. Politicians can beg for preferential treatment but Twitter ultimately decides what stays on their platform and what doesn't. It can be true that Twitter picked its favorites AND that all politicians are scum bags.

I guess it depends on how many of the requests in that database were actually acted on, doesn't it? If one side's requests were acted on at a rate higher than the others, that could imply bias. But I have no idea if the article tells us either way, as I won't pay for Rolling Stone.