Tenhigh

Not to kink shame, but I have noticex that you have a really weird habit of accusing republicans on "being on their knees", and "latched onto ... nutz". What do you think that is all about?

Sans that, when?

Just curious, but when do you think we should have entered WW2? Progress!

It's the "refusing to acknowledge the west's limited culpability and accusing anyone who questions anything about the glory of Ukraine as a Putin stooge" part. That and your war profiteering. 😱

This is why people accuse you of being a warmonger, Tibs. You really should care about all of it. We agreed to provide defenses to Ukraine in exchange for denuclearization. We keep providing assistance to Ukraine and do what we can legally to end the war, and not make it a proxy war.

No, please explain yourself.

So are you going to read it? Tibs, I am not asking you to root for Putin, I frankly hope he is assassinated and this war comes to a speedy close with no further loss of life and that Ukraine regains all of its illegally stolen territory. But you need to understand that history doesn't happen in a vacuu, and is not completely black and white. While all of these deaths are on Putin, the West did plenty of bear poking. That's not to say Putin was in anyway justified in his attack, and it may have happened absent the actions of the west, but it didn't. Does that compute?

Come on Suny, what do you mean by "on their knees"?

Awesome reply, keep being one of the good guys! Also, can you explain exactly what you mean by "on their knees"?

OK buddy. It is a conversation between (at the time) Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, talking about the Ukrainian opposition and who they were orchestrating to lead.

Information expands your POV, Tibs. Your unwillingness to see anything other than complete black and white in terms of Putin's war in Ukraine is frankly quite disturbing. Besides, I am not sending you to Newsmax, it's the BBC. That is the British Broadcasting Corporation, a well respected and slightly left of center that has been around since the 1920s.

Excellent! Glad to hear there is a future for this country!

Sticking to the shallow end, got it. But if Trump doesn't win the primary are you going to come back here and own these apersions that you have been casting around so freely?

OK, I vow to vote for anyone other than Trump in 2024. Now do you vow to stop making those bullshlt claims? Deal? And to be clear, you are free to think and say whatever you want, but know that you are spreading misinformation and contributing negatively to the culture wars in this country. And I will take you to task for it.

Nonsensical take, Gov. Search DeSantis and Twitter, and you'll see every major outlet had stories about it. NYT, NPR, etc. Totally agree. We need more real leadership like this:

I don't think you hope you are wrong at all. You seem to have no interest in rational discourse, but love to spout your tired nonsense like "republicans are on their knees for Trump", or "republicans want Trump to be king". Take a poll, that is simply not true, but I don't think you have the capacity to understand that. You'll just continue to parrot your black and white one dimensional nonsense.

Read the article, you handsome devil!

Lol, you better be a good looking guy, Tibs. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957

Oh, well if you say it, of course it must be accurate. Who am I to question the ivory towers of SUNY Amherst?

DeSantis isn't going to run on the same platform as Trump. My guess is that he touts his Covid response and refusal to let sex ed be taught in k-3.

Lol, Putin is a POS but you are an ostrich. It's not the 1000% black and white scenario in your silly head. Do you really think that NONE of the West's actions have had any effect on Putin's invasion?

Going to be difficult to choose. I like Jo Jorgensen if she runs again, but I am aware that a vote for her is essentially a vote for Biden. I think we are ripe for a real 3rd party candidate though, or ballsy moderate Republican who is willing to take a Democrat as his or her VP. The country is thirsty for moderates, but the primary system keeps @#$%ing that up.

You seem to think a lot about men in pants, Gov.

That is not what the US was doing though. Our government was actively trying to get their preferred candidate elected in another country because he better aligned with their interest. Do you think that is election interference?

Would you classify the US actions as "election interference"?