Tenhigh

I parked across the street from lot one, coming from the south side. I got in really fast, arrived at 8:45. Not sure why but this was the easiest parking for an opener I've seen in 20 years.

I am from the other side of the state so I don't listen to WGR much (which is a blessing from what I gather here), but on the drive into the game I heard a pretty interesting take. I think it was Jeremy that said "with Josh Allen you are going to see some pretty spectacular plays. It's just a question of whether those plays benefit the Bills or not".

I don't think that's the case. I think he is misguided and is so narcissistic by professional necessity that he can't even consider that he may be wrong.

You feel good about yourself after posting this?

Fixed it for this thread:

I think they don't have quite enough yet.

JFC man, let it go. You aren't producing anything here, no life is on the line, its just you obsessing over a perceived grievance. Do you wonder why this isn't a top story on any of your msm sources? Because it's a nothingburger. You are the one not being intellectually honest here, but its with yourself, amigo.

To be clear, were you ok when that same billionaire intervened to offer the people of Ukraine wifi? If you are a doctor, I am worried for your patients after reading this. You seem unstable of late.

It's for games like this where we should have kept AJ.

Buddy, you arrived at a conclusion as soon as you sniffed this story and have been flailing to find a path to get there ever since. And now you are stuck with a hot take turned cold. Good luck to you. But regardless, go Bllls!

Who on this board loves rolling in Trump diarrhea the most? Answer truthfully. Personally I hope he does go to jail. I am tired of him acting like an a@@#ole almost as much as I am tired of you guys acting hysterically over everything the man does (and sometimes doesn't) do.

What happened to you? I leave the board for a while and come back to find you making Billsy look even keeled. Step away, watch the game and chill, amigo.

Personally, it's only a huge story to you because you hate Elon Musk. Period. You don't have to reply, but before you post more here, ask yourself honestly if you'd have felt the same way if it was Bill Gates who decided not to let the Ukrainians use his free wifi for this attack. At least think about it.

I am not sure what you are talking about at this point. You have been successfully refuted so many times in this thread that I can't even follow your moving target. But keep throwing the shlt, maybe one day it'll stick. And I am not sure who brought up the border, I was only replying to your amazingly naive take that the Ds are good and Rs are evil.

The old "uh huh" defense, 8 year olds around the world are applauding your debate style. And I didn't bring it up, just replying to your 8yo level of understanding of border politics. Wait a minute, things are starting to clear up....

You need a hug, buddy?

In actuality neither party really wants to do anything about the border. It is a cheap source of fuel to fire up their rerspective bases. The naive eat up the narratives.

That is a slanted viewpoint, IMO. A private citizen offered his company's services with his own terms.

Presume assume believe perhaps. Jesus, man. In what universe can anyone other than a full blown head in the sand idiot call article comparing Musk to Benedict #$%@ing Arnold "well reasoned"? Except when he was giving free internet to the people of Ukraine, right? Did he forget to be evil that day? You are just twisting in circles here, Joe. My guess is the real reason you hate Musk pretty simple, like most people that share your views. First you assumed that a guy who makes electric cars and super batteries must certainly share your politics, and when you found he wasnt buying the same nonsense that you do, it felt like he betrayed you. Second, you resent that he took the liberal echo chamber hate-filled @#$!hole that was Twitter and turned it into the bipartisan hate-filled @#$!hhole that is now called X. Just my 2 cents, but what do I know.

And for the record, I think the US government should continue its support of the Ukrainians as per our agreement to get their nukes decommed. But I am not a big fan of how rich its making the MIC. I also don't think that many of my friends here on the left are consuming their news with anything other than blind trust. Like we are the good guys, but we put out propaganda too, you dig?

It's the property of his company, he set his terms for its use. You just want to bltch about his terms? Go nuts, it's certainly your prerogative, but first you should thank the "Putin puppet" for providing it to Ukraine in the first place. Honestly, whywould such an evil Republican monster even do that in the first place? They all are rooting for Putin, amirite? But for realsies, I have a feeling that if Bill Gates owned Starlink he wouldn’t allow it to be used for drone strikes either. Think a bit about that while you are filling out your Ukraine War volunteer paperwork.

The request to turn stsrlink on for the drone attack was late 2022 or early 2023, right? But the military contract, which we don't know the terms of, wasn't even signed until maybe Q2 2023, based on the article you posted. In light of this and your other article posting how very clear Musk has been about using Starlink, I have to ask again, what is the discussion even about?

Musk’s influence on the war in Ukraine via Starlink has been palpable. The internet system has been credited for assisting Ukraine’s advances, though they have been limited by Musk’s insistence that it not be used on offensive operations into Russia and threats the program would be shut down. From your own article, it sure seems like Musk has been pretty clear about use of his company's tech since the beginning. What is all of the noise about here?

I want to punch the guy with the purple shirt for wearing that terrible tie.

Bernard's family sits right next to us. I hope he pans out or it's going to be uncomfortable as heck.