Tenhigh

The US needs to worry about threats from Russia, China, insurrectionists, white supremacists, Antifa, rioters, looters and all sorts of stuff. None of that means that the goals of the WEF are all in America's best interest, or that they don't warrant any concern. I'm not sure why you are arguing that several wealthy individuals and world leaders don't have actual power when acting in concert, when we see individuals manipulate governments, board rooms and markets all of the time. And while I applaud some of their environmental goals, there is a hell of a lot more to WEF that that.

It was 40 degrees out with 30 miles/hr winds, and he's an 80 year old. Not everything is about race and gender, folks. Call it "old privilege", if it makes you feel better.

The one from Georgia is pretty clearly nuts, the other sounds like it as well if she incited violence, but I'm not sure I'd call either the face of the party. Right now, it's generally faceless, with the exception of mushy mouth Mitch. I think the party could use an intelligent moderate as it's new face. I think Jon Huntsman would be a good candidate, he seems like a pretty good guy, smart, willing to work across the aisle, and is well versed in international an domestic policy. Unfortunately, I don't think the @$$holes on the far right would accept a Mormon who gave illegal immigrants driver's licenses, and the @$$holes on the far left wouldn't accept a guy who served as Trump's Russian ambassador due to TDS.

I don't think that an organization of world political, business and economic leaders is inherently a threat to the US. But if you don't think that an organization of world political, business and economic leaders could be a threat to the US, then you may want to reconsider who the dumbass is here. These entities have their own priorities and needs that don't necessarily align with ours. Their view of the future may not match yours.

Hey folks. How about this, BOTH the Russian AND Chinese governments are terrible, and represent grave dangers to the US and our democracy. Don't let these @$$holes trick you into bickering with each other. They are both out to get us.

When we are all vaccinated I hope we can have a few beers in Hammer's lot before a game next year. Life's to short to get this worked up.

Take a deep breath. You seem to agree in practice about politicians being scumbags but you keep stepping on your Trump b0ner.

Are you so sure he is wrong? Politicians on both sides have been playing the public off of each other for years. On BOTH sides.

Where did this come from?

200 million Pfizer doses with option to purchase up to 400 million more. HHS That alone will cover the US. Here is another 200 million doses of Moderna. Also HHS 500 Million Astrazeneca and 100 Million Johnson and Johnson. CNBC cc: @Doc

I'd like to see @BillStime 's honest reply.

Where did you see that, BillStime?

Then your problem is with Dabol designing plays his backs can't execute.

I love first downs, don't you?

I'll take first downs, barely or not.

Don't mean to speak for Doc, but the phrase "the most likely explaination" is usually followed by someone's guess, no?

There are going to be some dead arms on those poor 300 people.🤪

Interesting point of view. How did he prevent them from getting ready? Just by the act of not telling them that the rally-goers were going to march to the Capitol building? Or did he issue orders for them to stand down? Not sure I follow your entire line of thinking here.

Do you really think that the bolded is accurate?

I'd be interested to know if most people agree with this. I sure as heck do, but didn't think it was really a shared view.

But it is so much easier to call each other fascists, communists, domestic terrorists and Libtards. We all pretty much a-holes on both sides. It's the ones who can admit/own it that represent our best chance at any kind of future in this country.

Frankly, I would love if we had a centrist party that didn't cater to the whims of the fringes of the dems and reps. But that seems very unlikely in our time.

Pushing for the ol' one party system, TB?

Trump is generally a POS as a human. As such, do you really think that Snopes would have given the same response had it been him instead of Biden in that write up?