Tenhigh

Perception is reality, doc. You hang in there and enjoy yourself.

So 10k posts in 3 years vs 22k posts in 23 years? Remember when I was trying to explain to you that you weren't winning all of those arguments that you thought you were? I was talking about this, this right here. As for the Burns doc, it's a bit of a slog for me so far.

You are welcome, but seem worked up about it, don't be, its not an argument for you to win. Here is more info though, if you want to learn; https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/news/hydroxychloroquine-provides-moderate-covid-19-prevention

Here is more: https://share.google/OgegwzWRlGtsWVEnR What do these findings mean? Although CQ or HCQ are unlikely to be used in COVID-19 prevention at this stage, they could have been deployed with benefit earlier, and they might have value in future pandemics.

I hope nothing bad happened to him. What about the article? Here it is again: Hydroxychloroquine provides moderate COVID-19 prevention — Nuffield Department of Medicine https://share.google/KhjjQo76pAXXHZyiO

I won't call you "liar", because I believe you truly THINK that you won a lot of those arguments. But call me whatever you want. Did you decide if you'd you prefer I call you Nassar or Mengele? Either work for me. And here is the article: Hydroxychloroquine provides moderate COVID-19 prevention — Nuffield Department of Medicine https://share.google/KhjjQo76pAXXHZyiO Note that I didn't say it was approved for covid prevention, just that the study showed that it had impact.

Thats pretty funny

I dont think you would really understand what I do, just consider me part of the post trade lifecycle. As for Doc, maybe he did have enough, people act like animals in this place. I hope he is doing something better with his time than embarrassing you as often as he did. Regarding the fraud you claimed, are you talking about HCQ? Ironically I just saw an article on a study that said it did moderately help prevent COVID. I can dig it up if you'd like.

What exactly was his 'fraud', herr doctor? If you are looking for mean nicknames for me, I work in financial services, go nuts. Nedward, what is funny about that?

Sick burn, Dr. Nassar.

Be nice, Dr. Nassar

Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best.

Where did I say that?

I don't think "client" is the right word here. He was a money manager, and from what we can see he was good at that. I think the trafficking and assaults probably overlapped much more with his social cirle than his actual clients. Did he or Maxwell have a diary of all the terrible things that these monsters did? The answer to that is probably not, because of the danger it posed to Epstein himself. Sadly, in reality people are looking for a magic bullet that in all likelihood doesn't exist.

I think his point is that the victims can't rely on politicians to advocate on their behalf, as evidenced by the years of delay in publishing anything.