Tenhigh

You are welcome, but seem worked up about it, don't be, its not an argument for you to win. Here is more info though, if you want to learn; https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/news/hydroxychloroquine-provides-moderate-covid-19-prevention

Here is more: https://share.google/OgegwzWRlGtsWVEnR What do these findings mean? Although CQ or HCQ are unlikely to be used in COVID-19 prevention at this stage, they could have been deployed with benefit earlier, and they might have value in future pandemics.

I hope nothing bad happened to him. What about the article? Here it is again: Hydroxychloroquine provides moderate COVID-19 prevention — Nuffield Department of Medicine https://share.google/KhjjQo76pAXXHZyiO

I won't call you "liar", because I believe you truly THINK that you won a lot of those arguments. But call me whatever you want. Did you decide if you'd you prefer I call you Nassar or Mengele? Either work for me. And here is the article: Hydroxychloroquine provides moderate COVID-19 prevention — Nuffield Department of Medicine https://share.google/KhjjQo76pAXXHZyiO Note that I didn't say it was approved for covid prevention, just that the study showed that it had impact.

Thats pretty funny

I dont think you would really understand what I do, just consider me part of the post trade lifecycle. As for Doc, maybe he did have enough, people act like animals in this place. I hope he is doing something better with his time than embarrassing you as often as he did. Regarding the fraud you claimed, are you talking about HCQ? Ironically I just saw an article on a study that said it did moderately help prevent COVID. I can dig it up if you'd like.

What exactly was his 'fraud', herr doctor? If you are looking for mean nicknames for me, I work in financial services, go nuts. Nedward, what is funny about that?

Sick burn, Dr. Nassar.

Be nice, Dr. Nassar

Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best.

Where did I say that?

I don't think "client" is the right word here. He was a money manager, and from what we can see he was good at that. I think the trafficking and assaults probably overlapped much more with his social cirle than his actual clients. Did he or Maxwell have a diary of all the terrible things that these monsters did? The answer to that is probably not, because of the danger it posed to Epstein himself. Sadly, in reality people are looking for a magic bullet that in all likelihood doesn't exist.

I think his point is that the victims can't rely on politicians to advocate on their behalf, as evidenced by the years of delay in publishing anything.

I think i struck a nerve here, and that the doc doth protest too much. What's the matter buddy, you don't like being called a Nazi? What if we went with Dr. Nassar instead? Let me guess, you don't like that either? So stop calling people stupid names and they will probably do the same to you. We are calling him Mengele or Nassar now. Should we decide with a poll?

He could have indeed, but let's play that out. Imagine he gets out of the way and she runs a toddler over in that crowded supermarket parking lot while fleeing. Are you going to tell me you wouldn't blame the police for that? I bet many would. Honestly, I don't think you could pay me enough to be a police officer in this country.