Justice

That's what I'm saying. Hit the ever living crap out of 'em.

And now it will be Favre. He absolutely loves the slant pass.

Why doesn't anyone make the Fish pay for using that play by pummeling Chad Pennington? When CP lines up at receiver he is fair game to get hit within the first five yards of the LOS, isn't he?

Larry already signed a 4 year 40 million dollar deal.

Well. for one, Arizona is 7 & 2 at home. Buffalo hasn't gone 5-0 since 1991 and it simply isn't easy to win on the road. By no means will tomorrow's game be easy. I expect a loss.

Alright Buffalo!!!

Yes

I hope so, the only problem is the Bills may be playing their way out of Buffalo. How will we be able to afford all these guys when their contracts are up?

Billy Joe Hobert here. Sorry, I didn't read your whole thread before posting.

Just wondering.

Because going for two would've been a horrible decision. If the Raiders would've missed the two pt conversion than they would've only had a 8pt lead over the Bills. Meaning that the Bills could tie the game with a TD and 2pt conversion of their own.

You're right. It's spelled out; ochenta y cinco.

My thoughts as Brady's injury was announced in chronological order:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=006axc2aELE

http://angrybear.blogspot.com/2008/08/gaso...-elections.html Here's a small piece from this article: But interestingly, since the oil market was deregulated, gasoline prices have shown a different seasonal pattern in presidential election years. In presidential election years the fall peak in gasoline prices shifts back to the spring and in the months running up to the election, gasoline prices are essentially unchanged. In the last seven presidential election years gasoline prices peaked in May three times, in June three times and in July once. So the question is why in non-presidential election years do gas prices peak just before November, but in election years they peak months earlier and are flat running up to the election?

It's funny you say that because Palin is also being looked at for letting go a guy just because he would not fire another guy.

YEAH!!!!!

Tell me why I'm wrong.

Now that I've had the chance to hear both candidates give a speech during their respective conventions, I came to one conclusion. Do you want a President that lives in the past or do you want a President that has a future? McCain never fails to bring up his past and remind us all of how big a hero he is. We know the man is courageous and was a great war hero but, should we give him the presidency just because of his past? McCain's introductory tonight was great and his autobiography was inspiring, but he should've mentioned something about the future as well. I realize McCain is probably in better shape, besides his skin cancer, than most people is age, but I wont even let my 71 year old grandfather drive the car on a family trip much less run the country. I, for one, truly believe that some nations will be better off with younger blood running their countries. Let's use Israel and Palestine as an example. Bring in a Palestinian President and an Israeli Prime Minister that truly believes in peace and the fighting will stop. The problem here is people often vote in the wrong guy. Only younger blood will see things more clearly. Our parents' generation was far more racist than ours is, for example. If McCain becomes President, how can he go to other nations preaching peace when all he does is vote in favor of anything pro-war? The war will resume and oil prices will climb. BTW. Has anyone else noticed the price of gas lately? It's going down. I wonder if that has anything to do with the election.

Two years ago a pro bowl running back left his team for greener pastuers. Last year, another team lost it's best offensive weapon to retirement. You know what those two teams went on to do? They both won Super Bowls. I'm just sayin'.

Yeah, let the republicans continue to run s**t. They're doing such a wonderful job. Just because he moved his speech to a larger venue doesn't mean anything. People wanted to see him. He greatly obliged. Let's see McCain sell out Mile High. BTW. As Senator, Barack Obama helped make gift receiving from lobbyists illegal. That's one freaking thing for you. You did ask for just one.

I truly believe that Obama's candidacy is NOT a show. There is some substance to Obama's style. Sarah Palin's selection as a possible Veep wreaks of an attention getter, a headline grabber. More of that "shock and awe" crap that right wing conservatives love so much. McCain spoke to that woman for all of five minutes by phone and that's supposed to be enough for McCain to make his choice??? Come on, dont give me that crap. I ain't buying it. It was all for show. Obama is truly inspiring and motivating. Just look at his speech he gave in a football stadium. 85,000 people packed the house to hear the man speak. If there's any showmanship involved with Obama it's only because he demands that kind of attention with his presence alone. Hell, even 250,000 people in Germany went to see that man speak.

I posted this on another thread that I started. (I didn't search before I posted) Here it goes. Sarah Palin: Not the VP this country needs. Nothing on the economy tonight during the RNC. Nothing on immigration or health care, either. This is the same group that tell us they are the "experienced ticket". Well if they are, they should know better than to just run a smeer campaign rather than speaking about the issues and laying out an actual plan to help fix our nation. Sarah Palin ran a town of 9000 as mayor but couldn't even run the economy in that little town, much less the whole country. She left that little town in degt! No wonder she doesn't want to discuss the serious issues, such as the economy. I also caught a more negative vibe out of the RNC tonight than what I saw at the DNC. Sarah Palin was overly sarcastic in her speech tonight. Overall, I felt that Gov Palin gave a great show at the convention. But that's all it really was, a show.

Nothing on the economy tonight during the RNC. Nothing on immigration or health care, either. This is the same group that tell us they are the "experienced ticket". Well if they are, they should know better than to just run a smeer campaign rather than speaking about the issues and laying out an actual plan to help fix our nation. Sarah Palin ran a town of 9000 as mayor but couldn't even run the economy in that little town, much less the whole country. She left that little town in degt! No wonder she doesn't want to discuss the serious issues, such as the economy. I also caught a more negative vibe out of the RNC tonight than what I saw at the DNC. Sarah Palin was overly sarcastic in her speech tonight. Overall, I felt that Gov Palin gave a great show at the convention. But that's all it really was, a show.