kegtapr

Really? Mine just start slurring their words.

Nah, but I used to be the midnight toker.

One handed typist, eh?

Yup, and the best part is I can suck, but people always blame others.

I am Mike Mularkey

Article speculates will be ready for Sunday. http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/p...PORTS/609210329

That implies social drinking. Most people around here are home alone alcoholics.

That place is just around the corner from me. It wasn't an employee, it was a parent. In the report I heard his child no longer went there so he had absolutly no reason of being there, that could have been changed though.

Better then "Call Husco........"

Does anyone still use that crap?

I guess we have something in common after all. Good day.

That's funny, seeing how you can count the number of times I've replied to you in the past year on one hand before this week. Keep trying Mr. Mod, you might actually make a point one of these days.

I was talking wars.....and if we've won one I'm yet to hear about it.

You very well may. We send out form letters which is what I would bet you're likely to receive. We only need to escalate it and retain the letter for our records if it specifically states in the letter that they would like to file a complaint, otherwise it's just taken as a rant that we don't need to follow up on.

I get these types of letters at my job and people are correct, they go in the special file (blue recycle bin to be exact) after being passed around the office for a good laugh at the smucks who write them.

Same record too.

It's obviously players too, but there isn't much doubt that it's the coaches allwoing them to succeed. You play 5 rookies in last years system and they would have been lit up. This staff has been playing them to their strengths and minimizing the chances to exploit their weaknesses.

Mr. Moderator likes to lead by example.

Now you know that's not true Simon, I just quit a couple years ago when I realized you were an idiot.

I'll post this here as it really belongs in this thread, not another and we should move the convo out of that thread. It was in response to a post by Simon about Mularkey not moving away from the run in Pittsburgh. Ok, just for the hell of it. I think think is stupid, but you called me out so I'll respond. Lets look at the stats. Rushing 2001 - 2746 yards 2002 - 2116 yards 2003 - 1495 yards Looks like a steady decline there. He may started out "smashmouth" but that sure didn't last long. Lets look at passing those years 2001 - 3295 yards 2002 - 4036 yards (with Maddox and Stewart? impossible!) 2003 - 2548 yards. Ok, I'll give you the fact that 2003 sucked overall, which happens to be when people claim the Steelers wanted Mularkey out. But how in the world could Maddox and Stewart pass for 4036 (when we all know big ben is god). So rushing dropped 630 yards from 01-02 while passing increased 741. Now lets look at attempts. Rushing 2001 - 580 2002 - 512 2003 - 446 Passing 2001 - 454 2002 - 551 2003 - 532 Wow, looks like rushing steadily decreased and passing steadily increased. Couldn't be. In 2001 rush attempts outnumbered passing by 126. 2003, passing outnumbered rushing by 86. Amazing. Lets look at post Mularkey when Big Ben the god came to be. 2004- Rushing - 2467 yards;618 attempts -- Passing - 2970 yards; 340 attempts. You mean to say Big Ben the god and savior only threw 2970 yards compared to Stewart and Maddox's 4036? Blashpmy. Why could that be? Could it be because Mularkey ran 39 more passing attempts then rushing with inferior QB's compared with 278 more rushing attempts then passing with the savior big ben? 2005- Rushing - 2223 yards; 536 attempts -- Passing 3104 yards; 371 attempts The Superbowl team behind big ben (the savior) had 180 fewer pass attempts then with the inferior Stewart/Maddox? Inconcevable. Must be because the defense totally sucked right? They were always playing from behind so they had to be pass happy correct? Wait, this can't be, the Steelers ranked 7 and 9 overall in defense in 02 and 03? That's obviously a far cry from the #4 ranking last year when rushing heavily outweighed the passing. Your probably right, Mularkey wasn't pass happy. Don't let my "squawking" get in the way of your "facts."

Ok, just for the hell of it. I think think is stupid, but you called me out so I'll respond. Lets look at the stats. Rushing 2001 - 2746 yards 2002 - 2116 yards 2003 - 1495 yards Looks like a steady decline there. He may started out "smashmouth" but that sure didn't last long. Lets look at passing those years 2001 - 3295 yards 2002 - 4036 yards (with Maddox and Stewart? impossible!) 2003 - 2548 yards. Ok, I'll give you the fact that 2003 sucked overall, which happens to be when people claim the Steelers wanted Mularkey out. But how in the world could Maddox and Stewart pass for 4036 (when we all know big ben is god). So rushing dropped 630 yards from 01-02 while passing increased 741. Now lets look at attempts. Rushing 2001 - 580 2002 - 512 2003 - 446 Passing 2001 - 454 2002 - 551 2003 - 532 Wow, looks like rushing steadily decreased and passing steadily increased. Couldn't be. In 2001 rush attempts outnumbered passing by 126. 2003, passing outnumbered rushing by 86. Amazing. Lets look at post Mularkey when Big Ben the god came to be. 2004- Rushing - 2467 yards;618 attempts -- Passing - 2970 yards; 340 attempts. You mean to say Big Ben the god and savior only threw 2970 yards compared to Stewart and Maddox's 4036? Blashpmy. Why could that be? Could it be because Mularkey ran 39 more passing attempts then rushing with inferior QB's compared with 278 more rushing attempts then passing with the savior big ben? 2005- Rushing - 2223 yards; 536 attempts -- Passing 3104 yards; 371 attempts The Superbowl team behind big ben (the savior) had 180 fewer pass attempts then with the inferior Stewart/Maddox? Inconcevable. Must be because the defense totally sucked right? They were always playing from behind so they had to be pass happy correct? Wait, this can't be, the Steelers ranked 7 and 9 overall in defense in 02 and 03? That's obviously a far cry from the #4 ranking last year when rushing heavily outweighed the passing. Your probably right, Mularkey wasn't pass happy. Don't let my "squawking" get in the way of your "facts."

You forgot to squawk

You want to keep being a dumb sh-- "SQUAWK" (look, I said it louder! ) go right ahead. The fact the people are spending a whole afternoon arguing about something I doubt they really care about anymore and has zero impact on the bills (outside of two games a year) is nothing more then a game of I'm smarter then you are (see squawk.) Does anyone here honestly care about Mularkey this much? Especially with the actual season going on and defeating a divisional opponent with another one next week? How about some more analysis of our current head coach and offensive coordinator, you know the ones that actually matter? The only thing we should really care about is he quit on the team. Whether or not we can thank him for that or be angry about it will never be answered, unless of course Jauron is the next Belichick. Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go back to sqwuaking.

I never thought we'd see such an arguement about Mularkey on this board again.......although it doesn't seem to be as much about Mularkey as "my balls are bigger than yours."

Take one more step forward please.