Fair enough. For the record, my initial reaction is, god forbid, similar to Alaska Darin's in that it does not feel right or pass the smell test. I would be less apprehensive if it were not a government owned company. On face value, it would seem easier to me for someone with an agenda in a government owned company to infiltrate sensitive areas for "terrorist" activities. For that rason, I would not want a Pakistani government owned company to manage the ports. There are factions in that government that would rather help Bin laden than help us. Would you be okay with a Taliban owned company managing the ports? It would certainly give me pause.