sfladave

NFL network is reporting that both sides are in fact still negotiating. If a deal is finalized before 6p FA will be put off to Tuesday at the earliest. If both sides are close at 6p, waivers will be put off until late Sunday night or Monday morning.

Careful, you never know if she's a fake, or is fat, but she does seem to have a sunny disposition!

Whoops it looks like I need to proof read my posts.

JP played in 5 games his 2nd time around and he scored 7 TDs. In Kelly's last 5 games he scored 6 TDs(5 passing 1 rushing). JP had an average QB rating of 77.48, Kelly 80.88. JP had 5 fumbles and 6 interceptions, Kelly had 6 fumbles and 6 interceptions. How can you suggest that Holcomb outplayed Losman much less significantly outplayed him?

I don't disagree with any of those rights at all, in fact it makes me proud to be an American where we have these rights! I was simply saying that a lot of people seem to think that the players have a god given right to that money and all of this is the owners fault. I think that some of the owners are being short sighted, greedy and are letting their testosterone take control of their decision making process. The players better be careful not to get too short sighted or greedy like some of the owners, or it may just come back to bite them in the ass. Upshaw talking about never going back to a cap if the current CBA is not extended is very short sighted. I understand the posturing he is doing and he is trying to put pressure on the owners to get their chit together. But if the cap disappears so too does the stability of the strongest sports league in the world. It may be nice for the top players who WILL get paid, but the majority of the players will not have that luxury. The NFL has grown stronger in terms of revenue and popularity because of the level playing field. Take away that levity and you'll soon have the league losing small market teams and fans. A smaller number of teams means less players, less viewers and less revenue.

Why exactly are the players entitled to a percentage of all money? As for the owners it is important that they keep an even playing field. I also think that Kraft made a good point about the fact that he paid for his stadium, as a few others have, while others have had stadiums handed to them by their host cities. What is a fair percentage of overall revenues that they should be sharing? Does Kraft make a good point in saying that if he has to share all of his revenues then shouldn't other owners share in his stadium costs?

The curse of TD still lingers!!! Davis does seem to have great potential, but I can't help but think a skill player with our first pick may be leading us down an all too familiar path.

BTW for anyone interested in the current CBA in full here it is.

Oh I did, but I just couldn't resist! I couldn't help but think of NJ when I read this.

Hmmmmm perhaps you should start here. Do your own homework!

Hmmmm, can I quote you as a deep inside source? I promise I won't reveal your true identity.

Does the NFLPA have any say in when the 2006 season and FA starts?

Not to mention the fact that our DL was so solid last year!

I believe I read somewhere that if they wanted to keep him they would have had to pay a $50 million roster bonus this year. If that was true why did they ever create such a contract when it was obviously never going to be honored?

I never thought I'd use LABillzFan's, "TBD's Ignore Feature: The Internet's No-nonsense sh-- Filter." After all it's differing opinions that make this board so interesting. You sir, have no opinion that means anything to me, nor do your "off the wall" predictions/rumors. Now I see the truely useful purpose of the ignore feature.

Soprano3695....hmmmm....well TSW member number 3695 was "PatsFan03" this may expalin a lot, we're dealing with a dumbass troll

Come on man where is your sense of sarcasm? Adams was hell bent on getting his way as far as how he plays his position. If you want a guy who loves to shoot the gaps and not take up space, he is your man! If you want someone who will listen to his coaches and play the way they want him to then Adams becomes a major distraction! Out of curiosity, who exactly was the 2nd cancer you spoke of, Milloy or Williams?

T Bone is that you?

Donahoe and Mularkey?

So what you're saying is that feelings are for suckers.

What's the fun of that? Accountability is the equalizer of the internet forums. It must be upheld at all costs, otherwise chaos would rule. Besides ball busting can be fun, especially if someone is willing to climb so far out on that limb again. Isn't it our job to chop off that limb?

Did Marv say that 2006 was null and void? That we are looking forward to 2007? What happened to we want to win now?

Feel shame????? For what? Not falling hook, line and sinker for another bold, "I have a deep throat source who told me....", line of speculation? Never trade on inside information...it will just come back to bite you in the ass, or in your deep throats case, make you gag!

Is this an idication the Bills may be going after Huff with the 8th pick?

Considering they had one of the best records in the 90s, if not the best, I think it would be safe to call them winners! Super Bowl victory or not! edit: As far as character players I think Marv wanted guys who would play their hearts out on the field during games. Training camp and practices were not where Marv demanded heart (ie.Bruce Smith). Like Jimmy Johnson's separate rules for the Troys and Emmitts, so too, does Marv follow the same rulebook.