ricojes

Every situation is different, I really don't think you can just lump everything together. Are they tough with players signed for 3 years, who want to re-negotiate and will not report to camp? Yes. Will they negotiate with players that are in camp who's contracts are about to expire? Yes. Will they try to be pro-active and extend players contracts? Maybe. Are they just tough to deal with under any circumstance? I don't know. Too many variables to intelligently discuss this topic (of course that's never stopped any one here before)...

Man, that really sucks...

Buffalo News story, "Trent Edwards is just a spectator at practice today with a leg injury"

Oh give me a break, that's ridiculous. To quote AI, "We're talking about practice. I mean listen, we're sitting here talking about practice, not a game, not a game, not a game, but we're talking about practice." And in practice, you do sit out with little bumps and bruises, so it's not an issue for game time!

97 Rock 103.3 The Edge

Here ya go...

I guess my personal opinion is wrong, . Seriously though, I don't want this to get into a Moulds vs Horn debate. But Moulds is 2 years removed from an 81 catch season. In '06 he had 57 receptions with David Carr at QB and in '07, he only started 8 of 16 games and still had 32 receptions with a run first QB in Tennessee. Horn is or was a solid WR (he did have 94 catches in '05), and it's very close. But with attitude factored in, I like Moulds.

After reading the "ESPN story on Peters", this makes sense and does make it somewhat comical. Without reading that post, it does seem a bit out there. Off season? You're kidding right, we're like 19 days or something away from the opener. Besides, the posts in the real off season are way worse...

He would not be a great compliment. Good? Maybe. He does have experience and decent size, so he wouldn't be a horrible pick up. But Personally, if your going to go the older receiver router, I would rather have Moulds than Horn. And would be happy with neither...

Exactly, not half as bad as DW stating the Bills WILL make the playoffs, which made front page news and was a heated debate on this board...[/sarcasm]

And a lot of 21 year olds as well.

I agree, 18 is old enough to serve and possibly pay the ultimate price for your country. So, when a young soldier ends his/her tour of duty, they should be able to come back and enjoy a cold one...

I could name a couple party's that may be interested...

Lol, now that's sad but true. If Brady is out against the Bills they may have a chance to beat them...

I don't think there is that much of a difference, but I do think Kelsey has the edge. I think the Bills use Denney wisely and that makes him effective. If Denney was the started, I'm sure he would "disapear at times" as well.

The figment

Time Warner Cable announced today that Sunday's preseason game between the Buffalo Bills and the Indianapolis Colts will be shown locally on Ch. 7 and will also be broadcast in HD on Channel 707. The game will start at 8:00 p.m. The game will be broadcast to the rest of the nation on the NFL Network.

Chicago media? If you notice, anyone can sign up and start writing.

That pretty much sums it up. Last week most were complaining TE's didn't have a TD pass, this week they are complaining that he locked into Royal too long on the TD pass. You just can't win here...

Weren't the Steelers #1 in the league in overall defense last year? Sorry, too lazy to verify but I thought they were...

Add another internet tough guy know it all to the list...

I could go with yo mama jokes with your avatar, but I won't stoop to your level...

(raises hand)...Oooh oooh, I know, I know...

You have no argument regarding this gem: I am undecided on Fairchild

6'4 231 is what they listed on the broadcast, that's solid!