You are wrong. One year of stats may or may not be determinative, but it may be significant in a larger population and i am guessing the poster wasn't a suggesting a finding of the scale you were attributing to it. Also, while this isn't statistically significant, other larger population studies have been done which support to the point ( which may or may not be significant). Regardless, your apparent position doesn't even have a population as supportive as this one. In any event, while as this study may be slanted, your response is more slanted and lacks any facts as well.