I'll play.
He seems to be what I'd describe as a non-emotional thinker. This places him well ahead of most people in debate. Do not, however, confuse this with lack of passion on topics. He expresses passion but does not (seem to) allow it to cloud his thoughts. His views are clearly presented and logical across a full spectrum of issues. He, from my remote view, seems to be very intelligent. On occasion, I don't agree with him but I typically have no issue understanding his position.
.003% intelligent? I have no idea. The fact that a percentage is applied to topic as complex as 'intelligence' is, in itself, a debatable topic. Having said that, we do 'measure it.' If he says so, I haven't seen anything that would make me believe it's out of the realm of possible.