KurtGodel77

Give him a chance. Not everyone has your level of experience at handing out libelous personal insults.

Sorry about that. CTM is one of the worst human beings I've ever known. But I can see why you don't want your thread hijacked by this. It would be terrible if this thread degenerated into personal insults and namecalling! I'll find some other thread to deal with monkeyface.

You're wrong, which is a habit of yours. YOU were the one who "dug up" my old PPP comments. All I did was point out that people choke when you walk into the room. You've got to be the most hateful and anti-social person I know. People won't put up with you in real life, which is why you spend so much of your time here.

Wow! Two whole sentences without once mentioning the words "Ilya Ehrenburg" and "propaganda minister." I'm impressed. Maybe someday you'll be able to write three whole sentences without mentioning these things.

You're confusing your own personal fantasies with reality. In other words, it's business as usual for you.

Erik Flowers was taken later in the first round, so (at least for me) he represents less of a bust than big Mike.

Clever. At least for you.

Much like everyone else chokes when you walk into the room.

I'm not optimistic about Spikes coming back from his injury, and being 100%.

Good point.

This sounds like it could be worth trying. If it doesn't work out, it's not like we've lost much.

I'm a Kurt Warner fan, so I'm going to chime in here. In the year the Rams won the Super Bowl, Kurt Warner threw for over 4300 yards, with 41 TDs to go with just 13 INTs. His passer rating was a ridiculous 109.2. Let's give the man some credit.

It has. But nobody likes a guy who says, "See, I told you so."

I never said that different races are different species; but that they are different subspecies. The gene pools of the different races have been separated for 100,000 years, and that's enough time for them to have become different subspecies. Which is a good thing, because it means there is more diversity within the overall gene pool. There is no sense in attacking or destroying this diversity by using marriage as a weapon against it.

Too high a murder rate, and too many government workers.

The main problem with that idea is that neither the city nor the district are good enough to be worthy of that kind of name.

In my original post, I wrote that any time you chose to step outside a particular worldview, those trapped inside that world view would see you as stupid or worse. Thanks for helping clarify the "or worse" part of that equation.

I saw a report indicating that the number of naturally blonde people is declining, and will reach essentially zero by the year 2200. That's at least one indication that global marital genocide is proceeding at a much faster pace than you seem to realize. Environmentalists worry about whether a particular subspecies of feline or bird or other animal may be going extinct. The Siberian Tiger, for example can interbreed successfully with other tigers, and even with lions. Even so, there is--and should be--concern about the fact this wonderful and unique creature may be going the way of the dinosaurs. How much more then should we be concerned about the preservation of the various human subspecies! We don't understand race, and cannot understand it in this day and age, when political correctness counts more than honesty or truth. Future generations will curse us if we choose to destroy something irreplaceable that we do not even understand.

To someone who has grown up influenced by the propaganda of the decadent media and academia, my post indeed looks stupid. Any time you step outside of a particular worldview, those trapped within it will often see you as stupid or worse. The world has a choice. On the one hand, there is a future in which the world's races have been mixed together to the point that all individual races would be extinct. This future would mean the death of global racial diversity, and indeed the death of the world's races. On the other hand, we can choose a future in which racial uniqueness is preserved; where no race has gone extinct. As for me, I choose life over death, beauty and justice and truth over decadence and globalization and sameness. This is why I utterly and wholly reject global marital genocide.

In that case you're a better man than me. At least you can achieve mindless namecalling.

Allowing interracial marriage wasn't a case of protecting individual rights. It was a judicial elite imposing a racial agenda upon an unwilling American populace.

It seems that your participation in this discussion has degenerated from intelligent debate to mindless namecalling. Oh, wait; you began your participation in this discussion with mindless namecalling. Bad dog!

You had a point?

While not as blatantly pro-Soviet as FDR, Truman was pro-Soviet until after the Republicans' midterm election wins forced him to reconsider his stance. Considering that Truman basically gave the Soviets Eastern Europe in the Potsdam convention, and fired McArthur for wanting to win the Korean War, I'd say that Truman did little to win the Cold War. After Churchill made his famous Iron Curtain speech, Truman's administration slighted the British government.

They revise the decency code, and based on the hysterical reaction I've seen from some of the people on this thread you'd think that Virginia had just adopted the swastika as the state flag. The big picture is that the decency code is now different. If that's the worst thing you can find to complain about, then Virginia's not doing that badly.