I wonder if the Albany Editorials where against all the goverment money that went to the area that former 3 men in the room member Brono represented got. I saw an editorial a couple of weeks ago that was in a paper from the southern tier, Corning, I think. It made a lot of sense. Why would the New York City and Albany coalition care if the rest of the New York State got treat fairly with egual goverment support and help those other areas grow. If the rest of the state grew, meaning more people outside the coalition areas, then the coalition would have less power. So the Albany Editorials against it is really no surprise.