tigerthelion

You just described Lamar Jackson's season last year. Who won MVP last year?

Legacy means very little if that is the case.

Also, Josh Allen had some stuff on social media from when he was a teenager, that came out years ago. Some journalists certainly have not forgotten that.

I give the Steelers a very slim chance to win. Russell Wilson looks so bad these days. We will see.

What history is that? Worst playoff performer in NFL history with multiple MVP awards to his name?

Based on last year's standard, I think Mahomes should be the MVP if anything. Allen should win, but if not him, should go to Mahomes over Lamar. If winning matters, nobody was better than Mahomes this past season. I mean, if last year is the standard and all. Lamar having, in all likelihood, more MVP trophies at this stage than Mahomes is kind of comical.

Maybe I'm being too harsh on Kincaid. I have been underwhelmed with his career so far, to be honest. Having said that, I understand your point and you could be right. I am not there yet, though.

Taking some pressure off of Allen would be ideal. He may even take his game to another notch if he had some more easy throws during games, with his maturity. When his receivers can't get open, it can get ugly (Ravens, Texans, Pats). Hopefully the offense hums in the postseason without Allen running for his life and playing Superman all game. If Josh player superhero and we win, great, but long term that isn't the best strategy. Hollins has been great for what they signed him for, but seeing him on deep routes is not ideal. With the way the defense usually plays in the playoffs, Josh is kept on the sidelines for long stretches of the game, which puts even more pressure on him and the offense to score every drive. I guess my point about Kincaid, and about the "everyone eats" mentality, is that if guys like him are going to not be big factors in the offense, why not just draft a tight end in the fourth round? Maybe higher draft picks should be allocated to picks that may be utilized more and stand out more on the field.

Good point. Maybe, maybe not. Either way, isn't it a misallocation of resources if Kincaid isn't producing like most fans had hoped? If he isn't going to put up better numbers, being drafted where he was, is that good for the team? Could they have found a better first round pick that would have been a real difference maker? Perhaps the drafting needs to improve or maybe the coaching philosophy could improve for some of the picks to have more of a meaningful impact on the game. For Kincaid's production, could you not get that in the third or fourth round?

Definitely a huge lack of leadership on that team, from top to bottom.