RI Bills Fan

CLINTONS BAD!! EVIL!! NASTY!! The quoted post was an automated response brought to you by the Fred in Wacka Society for continuous nonsensical Clinton Bashing.

More for the current leaders in the PPP Stupidity Index...

Methinks all references to "Wacka Molson" should now be replaced with "VA Brady."

As long as the correct "what's-his-face from Virginia" is identified, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. And I don't believe I've ever actually called Molson an Idiot, I havent exactly been singing his praises, but I think I've stopped short of that. And as for getting on Tom's case, I'm just not good lackey material...

Nice try, BUT... He did name two, and you attacked him about the methodoligy of one while ignoring the existence of the other. So yes it appears you do bash around idiots here for the benefit of the other idiots here. S'okay though, whateva floats yer boat....

I should stay out of this but I kind of feel bad for dragging (not that it took much) Molson into this thread. Jeebus Tom, were you the baddest guy on the little blue bus when you went to school? Did it make you feel good to push the other “Special” children around? And now that you’re “all growed up” does it make you feel good to leave rubber crutches next to the beds in the amputee ward? Does your ego get a boost when RK, Fred, Jarhead, Wacka and their ilk applaud you for beating down a helpless opponent? The kid has made more valid points then you have in this discussion but he’s let himself get distracted by your usual miasma of obfuscation and thinly veiled male bovine animal excrement. Just when did the fricking PPP board become a Peer Reviewed Journal? When did only primary sources become acceptable? Who made you the ultimate arbiter of methodology? Is the study flawed because of the methodology used or is it flawed simply because you don’t like the results? And how would you know if you don’t even know that Molson has been talking about two separate studies while you continue to whine about the methodology of the first while being seemingly unaware of the second? I highlighted the portions of your post that are just flat out false, If your gonna beat the tar out of the kid for not understanding what he reads you might want to read it yourself so that you understand what it is you’re accusing him of not understanding. That statement doesn’t validate the accuracy of the results any more than the opinion of a message board geek invalidates them. It does however offer some proof that the authors of the article at least attempted to verify the results before writing their piece and as far as I can tell the message board geek hasn’t even made the attempt to read the piece before dismissing it out of hand. Remember the lesson of the Dreager Tubes, Tom.

I love how you jump to the conclusion that I'm in favor of the fairness doctrine. When & where did I say that? Shrill and accusatory, with nothing but a strawman to back up your argument, how Wacka Molson of you.

Well, if the media is as blatently biased as you claim, then shouldn't you be in favor of the fairness doctrine? It's all about equal time, isn't it? This thread couldn't possibly be another shot at cherry-picking some insignificant thing and holding it up to create a strawman target for right-wing leaning wingnuts to pontificate about, could it? Nah! That couldn't possibly happen here on PPP.

Lets be accurate, Troll. You pray we'll be disappointed. We're just waiting to see what happens. And anticipating the joy of watching the *'s and their synchopant's self-distruct as the full truth comes out.

Sept. 9 DENVER BRONCOS -- WIN 27 - 24 Sept. 16 @ Pittsburgh Steelers -- WIN 30 - 13 Sept. 23 @ New England Patriots -- LOSS 21 - 24 Sept. 30 NEW YORK JETS -- WIN 34 - 17 Oct. 8 DALLAS COWBOYS -- WIN 23 - 10 Oct. 21 BALTIMORE RAVENS -- WIN 17 - 14 Oct. 28 @ New York Jets -- WIN 38 - 10 Nov. 4 CINCINNATI BENGALS -- WIN 28 - 17 Nov. 11 @ Miami Dolphins -- WIN 34 - 0 Nov. 18 NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS -- WIN 24 - 21 Nov. 25 @ Jacksonville Jaguars -- WIN 35 - 10 Dec. 2 @ Washington Redskins -- LOSS 33 - 34 Dec. 9 MIAMI DOLPHINS -- WIN 42 - 0 Dec. 16 @ Cleveland Browns -- WIN 34 - 3 Dec. 23 NEW YORK GIANTS -- WIN 21 - 10 Dec. 30 @ Philadelphia Eagles -- WIN 34 - 6 14 - 2

Why, you're right again Darin, you didn't... I'm sorry I must have missed that post all six times I reread this thread looking for it. could you please point that statement out to me? Rough Translation... Somebody bought into the spin, again... Are you really saying that the only way to keep the US Taxpayer from getting screwed is for congress to rubber-stamp the executive's decisions? How well has that worked for the past six years?

Darin, Darin, Darin... I'm sure that you missed this post... ...because if you had read that you surely wouldn't be taking off on another of your thinly disguised partisan rants... ...And sadly we haven't reached your libertarian utopia where all forms of government (with the exception of the Department of Mailing Checks to Alaskans) have been eradicated and replaced with seven surly midget curmudgeons in charge of road repair, so we still do have to put up with the antics of elected officials and their minions attempting to shape public opinion via selected expressions of outrage over the unscrupulous and possibly unconstitutional (or not) actions of the loyal (but maybe traitorous) opposition party who are busy usurping the authority of the other branch by being politically incorrect.

Did you actually read the link? It only says that he was supposed to meet with the Bills today, and that nobody noticed. It never says he arrived in Buffalo.

I came out with a pessimistic 12-4 But I wouldn't aargue with someone who thought we'll go 14-2...

Who is Peter Byrne? Obviously he has an axe to grind but after trying to decypher the following quote, I can't quite figure out if his axe leans to the left or to the right: "You would think that, considering all the money Feinstein's family has pocketed by waging global warfare while ignoring the plight of wounded American soldiers, she would show a smidgeon of shame and resign from the entire Senate, not just a subcommittee. Conversely, you'd think she might stick around MILCON to try and fix the medical-care disaster she helped to engineer for the vets who were suckered into fighting her and Bush's panoply of unjust wars." Conversely, I don't understand why everyone is up in arms about a story reported by some Silicon Valley Weekly Newspaper that none of the leading left or right wing national news sources will touch without further investigation. PS, IMHO Bring on the investigation if someone thinks this is worthy of using up the time and money. Until then it's just another far right talking point.

Everybody has probably seen this before, but it does sum up this thread perfectly... Why Faux Spews Sux

Around here you only get what you deserve...

Those Dammed Liberals may have drawn first blood, but you were the first one to Cry like a little kitty! Believe me kid, nothing you can do will ever have much of an effect on me. In fact the only reason I keep posting replies to your over-inflated sense of self importance is because I consider it my civic duty to do so. That and your bitching, moaning, and whining just amuse the hell out of me. I really need to find out what it is you think I keep walking into. Apparently it's something that makes little Pussies like you all giggly and twittery...

:lol: Bastard!

Hmmm... Tom vanishes, Ramius shows up, now when Ramius vanishes, will HA show up? Tom, please take your meds...

Well... Okay... But it still pisses me off...

:lol:

I'm just taking the easy way out today.

Jesus, I'm getting old, I completely missed this post the first time. Got it in one, Good Job Tom. Read the UCMJ. "Penetration, However Slight, is sufficient to complete the offense." An alternate quote would be; "The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions." To escape kitty status, one must actually do something, talking about it isn't enough. They're PUSSIES until they enlist and complete their first tour in Iraq. Nothing else will eradicate their shame. Tom please let me assure you, YOU are not a kitty. An Eunuch maybe, but not a kitty, or you could be a Taint, yeah that's it, you're a Taint. Nope, most will be classified as pussies, some will be classified as taints, and others will just be ignored as unworthy of classification.

Either that or shooting fish in a barrel...