RI Bills Fan

The linked article goes to great lengths in pointing out that a study estimates thet 75-80% would primarially vote democratic. Which explains why WorldNetDaily is against the proposed legislation. WBF is a different question.

That's about your speed...

Many here spent a lot of time and energy defending the last administration for many of the same things they are now attacking the current administration for. (Yes it's a badly constructed sentence, but it's still a true statement.)

Please tell me you're not comparing Ann Coulter to a Congressman or Senator.

Link(s)?

Just trying to help

Yes

This has already been debunked, by Magox I believe, the old split was closer to 80/20 & it moves to 85/15 65/45 adds up to 110 Casino's wish they had it that good. The average slot machine payout is somewhere around 93/7 Do the math

Yep, just like there are no lock-step Republicans on this board, just conservative independents.

And now we know everything we need to know about WBF.

Yeah, Yeah, everything you don't understand is "Stupid." Oops there goes the recess bell, time for all you 4th graders to get back to class. And you and RK being on the same wavelength says less about which one of you? OBTW You see the new Air Farce Uni's? Can you say Bus Drivers? Flying Bus Drivers? Weren't you the clown who just complained about me using the same saying over and over? Pot, Kettle, Black? Nah, not you! It's different when you do it!

It's a simple and reasonable question. The answer to which and/or the outrage expressed over the fact that someone actually dared to ask the question, says a lot about the answerer. "The only thing necessary for the victory of evil is for good men to do nothing" one of your heroes said that. Think about it. Interestingly, Magox, whom I frequently ridicule, was the only person who gave what I considered a correct answer. The rest of you "Lemmings" were too eager to jump on and correct the "Liberal" to look past the end of your noses. Not that I expected anything else

Read what 1soundbite said, and what I challenged him to prove, then pull your head out of your ass. Then when you calm the fluck down, point to the line in the article I posted where it says EVERYONE was yelling N****r! Because I missed that. The article talks about 1, count it again 1 person doing that. And I never said or implied anything else. There's a reason I ignore most of your posts, just like I ignore OCinhismommsbasement, WisconsinRacist, Wacka, and a few others, and posts like the one above clearly show that reason.

I've already copyrighted that... And the fact that you can't answer a simple question without resorting to useless blather and obfuscation isn't my fault. The funniest part of all this; you honestly don't understand the amazing irony of you making that statement.

Okay... The poster is available on lyndonladouch's website. How does that prove either of your contentions, where is the connection?

Actually the idea was limit the amount of idiotic diversionary material available for use in replying to my post. But I should have realized there is no way to limit your particular brand of idiocy.

Reading comprehension not your strong point? Start a thread about that, you might be surprised where I stand. TMCM (SS/SW) USN Ret.

Prove it, prove any part of what you just said, that the signs at the earlier rallies were all held by liberal operatives or that the people doing the namecalling in the article I posted, were in fact liberal operatives, and I'll start an appology thread to retact any negative statements I've ever made about you. OBTW, The reason I call you 1soundbite is that everything you post seems to come directly from right wing talk radio blather.

Yeah, I respond to exactly what he posted and you jump in with your typical "out of right field" sound bite. Just like your earlier non answer to the question. Try something new, keep quiet when you're out of your depth.

Ahhh... The old "Evil Liberal Infiltraitors sent to make the Pure and Patriotic Tea Partiers Look Bad Defense." You never fail to disappoint, 1soundbite.

True. Do you have any reading ability what so ever? Your response has absofragginglutely nothing to do with what I posted. Here I'll rephrase it for you; if your only response is to say "Well, Ya, but what about the time those freaking idiots from Acorn were caught running hookers?" I agree, they were stupid also, go start another thread. Do you see a little disconnect there, psuedo-brainiac?

What does this say about the Tea Pary Movement? Please spare me all the what about this or that responses, you want to discuss an incident where some left leaning group acted idiotically, start your own thread.

This is from the WSJ, (via Yahoo). So it should be considered a credible source. BUT! It goes directly against what seems to be the prevailing wisdom (?) of PPP, so Flame Away!

Just cutting to the core of your "Internet Tough Guy Facade" and pointing out that while there is a "Warrior" in your household, it certainly isn't you. Good then I'll let you know when what you "Care About" makes any difference to me. That was in reference to your lame-ass line about delivering the smack-down to Wacka and RK, which is about equal to FAUX & Sean Hannity giving Alan Combes separate but equal billing in an attempt to disguise the show's bias. It didn't work for them, it doesn't work for you. Everyone but you could see that in the original reply... think about that... Whatever gets you through the nite Binkie. I'm done with this, I know your inner "Internet Tough Guy" will prompt you to keep going until you are able to spew the last insult and claim some sort of pyrric victory, enjoy it.

Need I say more?