You make an excellent point there, and I do not think it makes sense to be too hard on Crowell, who obviously tried to play through the pain and only submitted to the necessity of surgery at the last possible minute. What bugs me about Tim G's reporting is that he continues to use the "5 weeks" theme as if it is a given, without appearing to consider the possibility that team doctors felt his recovery would take longer. Without that assumption, the argument that this had to be some kind of "FY" (which, as someone who once taught at an "F.U.", I prefer to use) by the Bills has much less foundation.
It is quite possible that a quick scope would have healed in that short period of time, but it is also possible that he would never be all the way back until he had the "works," which he is having now. Graham appears to realize that, but his recent article suggests that Crowell is just getting the works now because the Bills were big meanies who put him on IR. How do we know that his doctors did not tell him this was his only real option?
This does not have to be a story that reflects negatively on either Crowell or the Bills, but Tim Graham and various posters to this board appear determined to make it so, one way or the other.