PBF81

Maybe they'll have TVs in the crappers so they can go in there and watch the game where it's warmer.

Ya know, it goes from being a typical fan into a family without a dad, people trying to raise money to help them initially, and Simms essentially implying, 'No, don't'. Maybe simply say, "The guy trolled me incessantly, but I have to support the effort to help his family" or something. ... and if you're really that bitter about it after the fact. He's going to, for good reason, have a tough time talking that down. Sounds like a great time for him to have simply clammed up.

Twitter is the Speak-First-and-Think-About-What-You-Said-Based-Upon-the-Public-Reaction -verse. If brain activity could be measured by people that "Tweet" before they do, it'd have to rank among the lowest of any platform in history.

Cover! I'm not really familiar with all the sites and pubs, is that an online magazine? Do you have a link?

What are all the 1-year deals of players that actually contributed to above-average levels? Stocking our OL has been a clinic on 1-year deals and I can't think of one OL-man we brought in on a 1-year deal that played to above-average levels. Most haven't even done that. Anyway, just curious which ones you considered that prompted you to start the thread?

Money doesn't make him a good run defender. His specialty has been rushing the passer. I can't find anything indicative that he's an above-average run defender. I haven't even found that. If you've got something please let me know.

Well, that is the debate re: him. I will provide what both PFF and NFL said in their draft profiles about him tho. I've not seen any other site disagree. PFF: What’s his role: WLB Williams isn’t the guy you want taking on fullbacks in the hole anytime soon. He’s the one you want cleaning up for that guy. NFL: Williams looks and moves more like a big box safety with his bursts to the football and open-field fluidity. Lacking the size and strength to match up with NFL take-on duties near the line, Williams needs to become more adept at slipping blocks and staying a step ahead of the blocking scheme. We're in agreement there. In fact, two of our three losses last season were in games where we allowed an average of 160 rushing yards. One of those was against the Jets and their two sub-average RBs. Throw in Rodgers now instead of White/Wilson. IMO more teams run well against us this season since their passing games are going to open up against us. True, but we are also division opponents, which adds to their fire. Offensively, IMO it all, or 90% of it, comes down to Dorsey/Allen. If Dorsey figures things out this season, as he should if he's any good at all, then as I've previously said, IMO we have the ability to be the best offense in Bills' history. At the same time I can also see us finishing 5th offensively. I believe the word is Besties. I'm not sure about that however, it may be too soon. LOL

Yes, we're in agreement. I was simply stating that that was my opinion of the talent he had defensively. Which I think is sound. It is my opinion however.

Insofar as the Jets go, they've done better than anyone but the Bengals in keeping us down in points, allowing us an average of only 275 total yards and 18.5 points in both games last season. It's not like Rodgers has to be like he was in his prime, all he has to do is be better than White or Wilson, which like someone having to be better than EJ Manuel from our perspective.

I don't either, but you know the conversations. Get Cook here, then Henry too, then Barkley. etc. As if we're playing fantasy football. LOL I'm not as bullish on James as you are, but we'll see. He first has to prove that he's capable of enduring more than 140 touches, which was his high at UGA. I still view him as a role-playing RB.

Yes, and yeah, I've never gotten it either. And for someone like that, a "defensive minded HC" to continually choke in the big games in the playoffs, it's even more perplexing. Also, I get it too, we're always high on our draft picks, but many analysts had Williams going on day 3. By almost every account he's more of a S than a LB at the NFL level. He's a role-player to be sure, there's no way he sizes up in the Middle in the NFL. My best guess is that McD has some special use for him in mind. I wish we'd run a traditional 4-3 and find some guys that are capable of taking 70% snap counts on the DL and LB. This entire rotational approach needs to go. Just my two cents. I suppose one could argue the talent part, but keep in mind, he had Kuechly, one of the league's best, then players like Addison in his prime who was actually playing well then, and players that logged sacks that we simply haven't gotten here. IMO better talent, even if only somewhat. But anytime you have a MLB like Kuechly ... Yeah, sorry, but we'll see what happens this year.

Funny the difference from when the discussion's about him coming to us in past threads. LOL

Great point! He had almost as many rushing yards and yards-from-scrimmage as Mostert and Wilson combined. He also had one more TD than both combined.

I'm not sure I'd consider any RB currently on their roster to be above-average. I guess it depends upon how "above-average" is defined, Mostert did OK but hardly great in his first year of starting, but he's also old for a RB. Who knows about Achane, but until he proves himself at the NFL level. I'd probably keep him over either Mostert or Gaskin, but if I'm them and can add Cook, who also catches well, IMO that's a significant upgrade, and he's unquestionably a 3-down RB. We don't even have that.

Cook would be an upgrade over Mostert and Gaskin combined.

Yeah, I don't either. Here's my take on McD taking over. He's said something about a more attacking defense which Frasier apparently didn't have. Not sure I believe that, but that's moot at this point. McD's D in Carolina, where he had some very good talent, arguably more than we have here, and Kuechly at MLB, is Ds ranked perfectly average 15th/16th in his six seasons there in pass D. His run Ds about the same, perhaps marginally better.

IDK, Hill, Waddle, and then Cook if they add him? Coupled with our inability to defend the run against even mediocre RBs at times ... Sounds like something to be concerned about to me, particularly since neither draftee Williams nor newly acquired Floyd have as their specialty Run D. I guess I'd rather have him on the Fins than the Jets tho.

I know that Dorian Williams isn't. Seems as if our LB unit may struggle against the run again.

This was from the survey done by Legends that was sent out on behalf of the team about a year ago. It said that not all options may be available and again, it was a survey, but one would think that's about what we're looking at. I'm going to reorganize it by sidelines, EZs, etc. at some point. This is the way it was presented. ---------------------- The click-through poll laid out 48 price points for seats that range from the upper-level end zone (cheapest at $750 a ticket with a $600 PSL) to a field-level club seat between the 40-yard lines ($6,050 a ticket with a survey-high $24,750 PSL) to a 16-seat sideline suite ($347,700 for the box, averaging $21,250 a seat with no PSL). Reserved seating options Location: Upper level between 15-yard line and the end zone Coverage: Minimal, roof canopy-adjacent Heating: None Annual price per seat: $990 One-time PSL: $2,100 Location: Lower level between 15-yard line and end zone Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,730 One-time PSL: $3,950 Location: Mezzanine level end zone Coverage: Significant Heating: None Annual price per seat: $900 One-time PSL: $1,150 Location: Lower level between 40- and 20-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,900 One-time PSL: $4,850 Location: Mezzanine level between 25-yard line and end zone Coverage: Significant Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,580 One-time PSL: $3,200 Location: Upper level between 40-yard lines Coverage: Minimal, roof canopy-adjacent Heating: None Annual price per seat: $990 One-time PSL: $2,600 Location: Upper level end zone Coverage: Minimal, roof canopy-adjacent Heating: None Annual price per seat: $750 One-time PSL: $750 Location: Field level enhanced end zone Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,580 One-time PSL: $3,950 Location: Mezzanine level between 40-yard lines Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Annual price per seat: $2,080 One-time PSL: $5,950 Location: Mezzanine level end zone Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Annual price per seat: $820 One-time PSL: $2,100 Location: Lower level enhanced end zone Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,090 One-time PSL: $2,600 Location: Upper level between 40- and 15-yard lines Coverage: Minimal, roof canopy-adjacent Heating: None Annual price per seat: $990 One-time PSL: $1,400 Location: Mezzanine level corner Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Annual price per seat: $1,090 One-time PSL: $1,750 Location: Upper level between 15-yard line and end zone Coverage: Minimal, roof canopy-adjacent Heating: None Annual price per seat: $990 One-time PSL: $2,100 Location: Lower level corner Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,440 One-time PSL: $3,950 Location: Mezzanine level between 40- and 25-yard lines Coverage: Significant Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,440 One-time PSL: $4,850 Location: Upper level between 40- and 15-yard lines Coverage: Minimal, roof canopy-adjacent Heating: None Annual price per seat: $990 One-time PSL: $2,100 Location: Lower level between 40-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $2,280 One-time PSL: $9,000 Location: Mezzanine level between the 40-yard lines Coverage: Significant Heating: None Annual price per seat: $2,280 One-time PSL: $4,850 Location: Upper level end zone Coverage: Moderate, canopy overhead Heating: None Annual price per seat: $750 One-time PSL: $600 Location: Lower level between 25- and 15-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $2,080 One-time PSL: $5,950 Location: Upper level between 40-yard lines Coverage: Minimal, roof canopy-adjacent Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,190 One-time PSL: $2,100 Location: Mezzanine level between 25-yard line and end zone Coverage: Significant Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,310 One-time PSL: $4,850 Location: Lower level end zone Coverage: None Heating: None Annual price per seat: $1,190 One-time PSL: $1,750 Individual premium seating options Location: Mezzanine-level club seat between 40- and 25-yard lines Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $2,800 One-time PSL: $11,200 Location: Mezzanine-level club seat between 40-yard lines Coverage: Significant Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $4,000 One-time PSL: $20,000 Location: Lower-level club seat between 40-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $4,350 One-time PSL: $13,600 Location: Lower field-level club seat between 40-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $5,050 One-time PSL: $13,600 Location: Lower-level club seat between 40-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $5,350 One-time PSL: $9,200 Location: Mezzanine-level club seat between 40- and 25-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $2,800 One-time PSL: $11,200 Location: Mezzanine-level club seat between 10-yard line and end zone Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $2,400 One-time PSL: $5,150 Location: Lower field-level club seat between 40-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $6,050 One-time PSL: $24,250 Location: Lower-level club suite between 40- and 25-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $4,500 One-time PSL: $13,600 Location: Mezzanine-level club suite between 25- and 10-yard lines Coverage: Significant Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $3,000 One-time PSL: $6,250 Location: Lower-level club seat between 40-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $4,350 One-time PSL: $11,200 Location: Mezzanine-level club seat between 40-yard lines Coverage: None Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price per seat: $4,500 One-time PSL: $20,000 Suite seating options Location: Sideline executive suite Number of seats: 16 Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $198,150 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level living-room box in corner Number of seats: Four Coverage: Significant Heating: None Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $75,150 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level loge box on sideline Number of seats: Four Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $54,000 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level loge box on sideline Number of seats: Four Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $60,250 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level mini suite on sideline Number of seats: Eight Coverage: Enclosed Heating: Climate-controlled Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $103,450 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level owner’s suite on center sideline Number of seats: 16 Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price: $347,700 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level owner’s suite on center sideline Number of seats: 16 Coverage: Enclosed Heating: Climate-controlled Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $214,150 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level loge box on corner Number of seats: Four Coverage: Significant Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price: $63,250 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level living-room box on corner Number of seats: Four Coverage: Significant Heating: None Food and beverage: A la carte Annual price: $63,250 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level executive suite on sideline Number of seats: 16 Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $267,700 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level mini suite on sideline Number of seats: Eight Coverage: Enclosed Heating: Climate-controlled Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $77,100 One-time PSL: Not required Location: Suite-level living-room box on sideline Number of seats: Four Coverage: Significant Heating: Above seats Food and beverage: All-inclusive Annual price: $60,250 One-time PSL: Not required

As long as Allen is the QB they may be fine. It'll get interesting to see what happens after he retires.

Is Floyd a good run defender? The schtick on him seems to be pass-rush primarily.

Then the post below yours. 😆

That depends upon how we lose those additional games. If we continue to get outcoached against the better teams, particularly in the playoffs, and after all of the offseason moves, then it cannot possibly be defined as success. Presumably you agree. If we go to the playoffs and advance to the AFC CG and lose to a team that simply outplayed us despite our having put up a fantastic game otherwise, then yes. But if we continue to play poorly against lower seeds and get outclassed and cannot advance past the Divisional Round again, then it would be a difficult argument to suggest that we've improved or to define an otherwise underachieving season as having been successful. Or if we lose a bunch of games due to allowing near 200 rushing yards for example. In three of our losses last season, 2 in the regular season, we allowed an average of 164 rushing yards. Cook was the only above-average RB we faced in those three games. With more talent is more expected, both in terms of record as well as playoff performance. We have one of the most talented teams in the league, even if only because of Allen. I envision no scenario for claiming "success" if we cannot win the division or if we get bounced from the playoffs in the WC or D round again. There is no good reason why we should be anything less than a #2 Seed if we're not underachieving.

Ya never know. I figured the work part was made up. LOL

I think you have to expand that analysis. Of the past five drafts, prior to this one, Beane's drafted 9 players. Of those 9 players in rounds 1 & 2. Of those 9 players 4 were DL, 5 were Front-7, and 6 were D overall. The offensive players taken were Allen of course, Ford, and Cook. This is the first year that his Draft was focused on offense. As Cowherd said, and which otherwise is know, rookie TEs rarely make an impact. We'll see how this Draft plays out this year, but at least it was offensively focused. Colin saying the quiet part out loud. LOL I see that it threw a Baby Ruth into the forum pool.