Nephilim17

We need a potential number 1 receiver to be drafted this year or next. Our books are very, very tight cap-wise the next couple years and we need cost-effective labor. 90% of the people here just want to sign some star free agent but you can't keep doing that pay Josh and Steph and Von and others without the young talent coming up through the draft. We're going to turn into the Rams — possibly without a championship — if all we do is sign or trade for high-cost vets.

Some penicillin should clear it up quickly.

Lots of comments about Harris just being as short-yardage or goal-line back. I don't think so. You're gonna see him rumble in the open fields for a lot more than a yard or two here and there.

This might be the closet to a "bowling ball with knives" runner we've had since Henry. Minus the train of women with babies and lawyers in tow.

I certainly don't trust him/his staff to evaluate pass rushers or running backs. When you draft a back in the 3rd and let him sign with a crap team for $3.75 million (I bet the Bills could've resigned for less) that says he doesn't hold much value. So a third-round pick you don't wanna resign for $3.5 million. Add in Moss for a third and that's pretty bad management of draft capital.

So if we're on track for a third-round comp pick, does that mean Beane's good again? Devin ran hard and played well enough but to let him go for this money (I'm sure he'd take less from the Bills) really speaks volumes about how they didn't want him back.

Good weight on him to go with better than average speed. Good blocker and young, I like it. Not saying he's our number 3 guy, but we need depth and you never know.

If we get him, I hope it goes well, but this thread could turn out to be one page for every 5 yards he gets with us... (800 yards / 150 pages). Quite the investment for not a spectacular return, in terms of fan capital. Again, I hope I'm wrong and if we get him he tops 1000 yards. But at his age and with his history, I'm not sure.

Pretty good!

How dare he say we have a top-3 QB in the league! How dare he say that a three-time MVP and Super Bowl champion is better than Josh! Yes, Rodgers, is past his prime but Beasley is a) looking for a job and b) most likely talking about the career of Rodgers, not his current ability (see a) for a reason why he would do this).

Why is the OP using 2019 stats as a point of comparison to an aged Frank Gore with a different team, different, O-line, and different Josh Allen? If you want a more accurate apples-to-apples comp, use 2022 and Cooks stats vs. Singletary's as a point of comparison and to have "inarguable" statistical comparisons.

I've heard he has great intangibles but his measurables do not indicate a "great athlete." https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Terrel-Bernard-LB-Baylor

Like getting a younger backup who maybe can stick around a few years or more. Looking back at a Kyle Allen scouting report, the "Allen" similarities don't end with the letters on the jersey: STRENGTHS: There’s a reason why he was a top recruit coming out of high school: his arm. Allen possesses a strong arm and is capable of making any throw. WEAKNESSES: Everything Allen needs to work on is between his ears.....it’s all mental. https://www.underdogdynasty.com/2018/4/13/17219366/2018-nfl-draft-prospect-profile-kyle-allen-qb-houston-cougars-texas-a-m-aggies

If Miller and White recover most of their pre-injury form, and that's not a given, this D could be pretty good in 2023 with Rousseau and Elam developing... And just maybe a new MLB means we tweak the scheme which I'm all for after years of bad playoff D...

That's great. Really looking forward to seeing him play for us.

Good signing. You don't get a 6'4" receiver with track speed and good hands and availability at a discount. Yes, it's a chance, but you've got to take them when you don't have a lot of money but a lot of holes to fill. If he stays healthy, yes, a big if, people will love him here.

He signed a six-year, $90 million contract in 2019. We won't see a back get that kind of money again for a long, long time.

I think if anything it might increase his dead money if traded: when a player is traded or released the original team the player belonged to eats the remaining signing bonus and that's the dead cap. The yearly salary (not signing bonus) is assumed by the new team. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I'm about 90% sure I'm right (then again I was 90% sure I was right when I got married and now I'm a single dude living in a box in the sky). So this, to me, suggests, Stefon is here for a while.

It starts with some cheap but easy-drinking Pilsner and ends with some double vodkas.

No, it's not my money but I don't want the Bills cutting a player after one year into a three-year deal and taking on a chunk of dead cap. A little doesn't kill a team but it adds up.

I don't wanna give this guy at three-year deal at his age but one, maybe two years, sure — if the money is right. Athletes these days are better conditioned and eating better and playing at a top level later than ever.

I'd like to see that too (and, btw, I'm sincere, not sarcastic.) No way in hell we need to pay an LB $18 million a year.

This is one of the few times I'm happy to lose a good player in FA. This means more available money for the O-line and weapons — this year and for years to come. Theoretically.

Good move for them. I'd take White as a backup any day.