Joe Ferguson forever

The woods are full of interesting things. A bear wrecked our birdfeeder. And knocked over the garbage. Wild turkeys are a mess. There was a huge snapping turtle in the pond. And then a water snake. The fish are smart enough to hide. And I’ve got bear spray, an air horn and shotgun. Be prepared as we were taught in scouts.

never thought for minute that he wouldn't. And y'all wanted this.

It;s gonna be alright

except for some, it's not about religion. My religious beliefs align with the rights. It's about live and let live on social issues. Who am I to judge as Pope Francis said. But authoritarianism I can't abide.

trump

In your head deep...!'m somewhat incapacitated at present. Bingo's OK ,I guess. But when I play games, I prefer bridge. And pi$$ing off the lib "owners". And I've been a Bills fan since I saw them practice at Niagara University. This is very cool: https://www.buffalobills.com/news/throwback-thursday-bills-training-camp-history-10537441

And your good with that...I'll mark you down as in favor of authoritarianism, Asshat.

Face it. The train wreck that was the Biden administration and is the Demicratic party is what got Trump elected Agree up to here. The biden admin did not satisfy the majority. And hiding his apparent Parkinson's and probable dementia was disgraceful and badly damaged our party.

have seen them. They're sharp and should last a long time. you might even be able to pass it on. It's cool to have a love one's watch. My jazz master has a skeleton on the back. More subtle I think. no and the didn't Jan 6. I was comparing lies about riots or did you miss that?

From the police chief's presser, he told a major lie. but at least he's not a member of congress... https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/13/politics/andrew-clyde-january-6-riot/

Not thru authoritarianism. I guess you one of Americans who support that?

That's very definitive from an important source. But the NG is only authorized, by law, to offer support. The definition of that is of maximum importance

I had my dad's cleaned by a local jeweler. Looks brand new. It's over 50 years old. I think he charged me $50. You might try it.

They were stopping it. I thought you were a states rights proponent.

No, I have 2. My father's gold, US made automatic masterpiece retirement watch and a self winding, swiss made Jazzmaster. Love them, especially the old one. Considering getting a ventura.

The Assholocaust https://mattlabash.substack.com/p/the-assholocaust

Yes “Doc”, you are a joke. Keep on laughing.

Here’s the original article I quoted as saying scholars were almost unanimous on Hamilton opposing the alien act. There’s always a few outliers and this dude from middle Tennessee state apparently is one. Interesting his piece contains no citation. The one I cited has many to support the claim https://www.jstor.org/stable/i261237

Yes. The scum were attacking federal property and threatening federal employees. As I recall, the mayor of DC requested them as well. The mayor of LA and the governor of California did not. I read it. The author doesn’t definitively know that. How could he? Might not be known until California does a complete investigation. Reports like the PBS one you incorrectly read suggest this might not be true. So what if they did fire chemical irritants. Simple question, simple answer.

So you still say Hamilton (which are great watches, esp the Men in Black one) supported the Alien act. No where near 2 hours maybe a half hour in between bridge rubbers. Time well spent to prove, once again, that you are an ignorant liar. Cool story indeed.

So if they used chemical irritants would not be support! Your answers are clear as mud but it seems that’s what you are saying. My link was from pbs and did not say they were just there for support. It said what I quoted.

I’d like you to understand and heed his words. Start here and let’s go from there: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-politics/article/abs/alexander-hamilton-the-alien-law-and-seditious-libels/5DB64688EC0D94E80633CA011EFE4C37

Not what he said. Use his words as I did and stop paraphrasing to support your argument. "it is not meant to contend for a total prohibition of the right of citizenship to strangers, nor even for the very long residence which is now a prerequisite to naturalization, and which of itself, goes far towards a denial of that privilege. " trump is. the only immigrants he's recently allowed in are white South Africans. Oh, and those that pay $5 mil.

So without any evidence, you assume that they didn't? You also assume that they weren't ordered to. you avoided the question. If they did, would that be outside the parameters of "support"?

Why aren't you following up on you Hamilton citation? Seems pretty clear what he meant and it wasn't what your post concluded.