Joe Ferguson forever

Approval unchecked, as I said. You said checked. You’re the one disowning your own statement and painting yourself in a corner. It’s actually pretty simple: trump wants a privately funded monument on treasured public land that closely resembles the arc de triumph. The name of that monument has not been determined but will almost certainly mention trump. The rest of what you wrote is deflection. And par for your course.

I love democracy. I like people to follow laws. I hate dictators.

Not sure why you would omit this from the linked piece New commemorations typically need congressional approval as part of a 24-step plan developed by the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), which approves designs along with the Commission of Fine Arts (CFA). Federal law prohibits new construction on the National Mall, which is typically the most desirable real estate for monuments.

Why build for that reason if it won’t be done by the anniversary? trumps name is plastered all over the globe. It’s his mo. He’s the ultimate narcissist. would you be ok with it being called arc de trump ? It’s a yes/no question that none of you MAGAs will answer.

No. It hasn’t been checked. Will need congressional and other agencies approval if he plays by the rules but dictators don’t.

It’s to be privately funded but on cherished government land. Why is that if it’s for the 250th birthday. At least the public might get some use from it unlike the 250 mil ballroom. Do you truly believe there will be no prominent inscriptions or dedication s to trump on the arc? What makes you think he won’t call it the arc de trump. He renamed the Gulf of Mexico. Would you be opposed to this being called the arc de trump? btw, it’s unlikely to be done for the anniversary. Then why build it for that reason?

I don’t know anything about the plaza. Was it dedicated to a single living person on his own order as president?

Do you believe trum is helping you more than he’s helping corporate fat cats? If so, provide your reasoning.

He’s naming it the arc de trump. Perhaps in 20 years it will be torn down like the statues of other dictators have been. Hopefully, it will never be built with this insulting name.

You truly are unable or unwilling to discuss a serious issue in an appropriate manner. Pathetic.

Just the opposite. I’m ashamed of my country even considering this. If any congressman Rs have any dignity they will vote against this but they’ll likely fall in line. And MAGAs will likely be pleased. So what’s your opinion.?

Thoughts? Mine is that this is what dictators do. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy7e8lv176go it also makes me want to puke.

I wonder if she’s shot any pets. It tough to choose between this and the arch de trump monument as the most ridiculous recent story.

The result of so many rejected losers who are unable to find willing sex partners.

These are the leaders young MAGAs are following. Might well represent the MAGAs hete. America can do much better.

She could have ended up a Victoria secrets girl had not trump bought her. She’d have been better off except that Victoria’s Secret is closely tied to Epstein.

She was a pin up and then an escort Now she’s paid to be trump’s jewelry. And you find that attractive? I wonder if she will find a visit with the new pope so spiritual.as the last. If she’s the model of womanhood I’m Brad Pitts. should her parents been granted citizenship just because Donny got a new toy?

Link one. Seems like he was an activist utilizing his first amendment rights. Did you see something outside those boundaries? What did he do to justify shooting him in the face?

Why would I go to a pride parade? Why did you go? So save me some timw and post a link. include specific references for the priest. do u think shooting him in the face without warning was justified?

Satrre also wrote "Nausea" which is what Feel when I read your posts. Expose themselves to kids.. pretty serious allegation. Have any proof like they have for the Epstein case?

Sound familiar? just replace anti semite with maga “Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.” ― Jean-Paul Sartre

you're not gonna get a good faith argument from these goons. they have nothing better to do than try to pull your chain. they don't care about clergy getting shot in the face. They see that as a win but they're not going to specifically address the incident. because, as you said, it's indefensible.

Jones has nothing to do with a priest getting shot in the face. confirmed: you got nothing. If you did, you'd like nothing better than to prove me wrong. You're not to be trusted. back to ignore.

Aren't what? We don't condone shooting priests in the face with no warning. do you? So you got nothing...

So tell us what your sources say. better yet, post a link. support your claim. It will make you appear more honest. maga's are shameless for the most part,