Joe Ferguson forever

Miami is a legit top 5 team. anyone disagree? we're better.

He shoulda caught it. Perfect throw.

we all knew they weren't beating the Bengals last year, for lots of good reasons. This was a bellweather game.

The conditioning on this team is amazing. /they all look like they could try out for the olympics. Injuries unfortunately happen even to the best conditioned. But they filled in and 47 looked ok at the end. White has not been himself since the ACL but was coming back. Hate it for him.

58, 50, 56 and Oliver.

Most important game since the KC playoff game. The Bills rose to the occasion and then some. Love this team.

why not just take the challenge? Loosaa....you and the Phins...

You evaded. It’s what u do? I’ll take that as a concession not that your judgment is necessary…

I did. It means what I summarized. How bout u providing your alternative fact summary. Use your own words. You’ve got plenty. But I bet you don’t rise to the challenge…that’s the MAGA m.o. and why u will fail

Mine would be next to my driveway. Basically in a meadow. I think they would distract from the meadow, nature vibe which I enjoy. That said, it seems natural to use the sun's energy. I'm gonna price a propane generator and decide. If the world devolves into chaos, there won't be propane but there won't be much of anything. Got lots of firewood, game and a garden. Those will have to do.

"change some names and dollar figures and shuffle a few minor details". other than that, "verbatim". Must have had few too many last nite. tee many martoonis.

U cant make this up. Well perhaps MAGAs can… Yup, you write and reason just like a real doct😅or Namaste

Black is white. White is black. There is no gray MAGA mantra

Verbatim. Please link Yes John, the ugly underbelly is more exposed. Offense is the best defense x when you have stupid O coaches and bad players

And will finish it and your false messiah. I think the “golden pig” works. Worship away, I don’t know anyone that worships any D pol. Might your summation of the trump impeachments be biased? Arguable? Let’s Go!

You MAGA’s are funny. But not in a good way. Words matter. So do lies out of morbid interest, what did those books say about developmental sexuality?. Not a subject I know much about. Personal experience was linear Hetero. Please advise.

What’s that, Dr Feelgod? Oh the one about hydroxychloroquine or the one about vax risks/benefits? Articulate man! For the good of humanity

Now that's a powerful argument. And your point? where's that? I'm thinking my dogs point better than you...

glad you directly addressed my point. strong work.

It's a conspiracy of the MAGA morons. Now there's one I'm inclined to believe🤣. You and Lenny should get your heads together. You'd be dangerous....so the border, the economy and the green new deal aren't compelling reasons to want him out sooner? Oh, and the transexuals and filthy books on slavery that are available to kids in schools.... Good to know.

I read them and interpreted them. Your turn, Counselor. I don't have at hand one of those corny, silly, disparaging labels. That's your game, not mine. But as I said, the words meaning are self evident and clearly hearken to the 14th and the 5th (Umm he's a constitutional lawyer testifying on the constitutionality of the proceedings - u think he might be referencing the constitution?). Only a dummy😁 or liar could not recognize that.

so how do you interpret what I reproduced from his testimony? How would you summarize it (in 100 words or less)? In what ways does it not support my summation, counselor? LOTS of bluster, dude. Little substance....confident Professor Turley would be unimpressed by you.

that's a big L, country esquire https://www.transitchicago.com/howto/riding-the-train/ What say ye?

He did say that....and it no way refutes my summation. It actually compounds it. You deceptively ignored the section of his statement that I highlighted which I will do again since you're being obstinate and vague. You've taken the L every time we've sparred. This is a knockout. But go ahead. Try to deceive the chorus... " I have previously expressed concern over the recent departures from the historical practices used in impeachment inquiries. Regardless of the outcome of this inquiry, I am hopeful that the House can restore important procedural and due process protections to these inquiries." 14 th Amendment Procedural Due Process “Procedural due process” concerns the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. The key questions are: What procedures satisfy due process? And what constitutes “life, liberty, or property”? Historically, due process ordinarily entailed a jury trial. The jury determined the facts and the judge enforced the law. In past two centuries, however, states have developed a variety of institutions and procedures for adjudicating disputes. Making room for these innovations, the Court has determined that due process requires, at a minimum: (1) notice; (2) an opportunity to be heard; and (3) an impartial tribunal. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank (1950). With regard to the meaning of “life, liberty, and property,” perhaps the most notable development is the Court’s expansion of the notion of property beyond real or personal property. In the 1970 case of Goldberg v. Kelly, the Court found that some governmental benefits—in that case, welfare benefits—amount to “property” with due process protections. Courts evaluate the procedure for depriving someone of a “new property” right by considering: (1) the nature of the property right; (2) the adequacy of the procedure compared to other procedures; and (3) the burdens that other procedures would impose on the state. Mathews v. Eldridge (1976). Aren't you a country esquire?

Truth https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/30/opinion/trump-gop-election-2024.html