Joe Ferguson forever

just another loyalty test riddled with lies. And the confirmation that US troops will be used against Americans. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/media/2025/09/30/trump-hegseth-speech-generals/86436821007/

Lisa Murkowski is not so sure that Justice is an honest broker https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5528139-murkowski-comey-case-political-interference/

It was 3 years ago. It was actually to deliver the "Spirit of Virginia" award to the museum. I misremembered the reason. You win again!

Youngkin. met him at an art museum. They were doing a ribbon cutting for a new addition. Ready to pounce huh.? And you criticize me for being confrontational.

You mean beta max? Some great stuff: the formula one show is great altho the drivers are prima donnas. Similar pro golf show is also good. Many good documentaries. Lots of original movies and series and big screen movies your loss

Never. We love it.

I’ve met him. Nice enough guy but would sell his soul to get a leg up. He wants the presidency.

A governor who doesn’t do trump’s bidding. Otherwise it’s a great state.

He looks like the whale in 2006. That or John Daly

Cool. Do you like beef, fruit and vegetables? Some can get to the grocery store yet not be able to afford these. How did you like how they treated your countrymen on Long Island? MAGA manners.

Kinda look like modern iron lungs for polio victims. We may well need them.

No. Most of us want a safety net for the poor Medicaid, Medicare, food stamps, public housing. The bare necessities for those in real need.

He seems rational and measured.

63% ( closest to 60, not 70) and that’s from his record high. He’s doing just fine. His lucrative contract is secured and he’s getting his message out to a coveted audience. https://www.foxnews.com/media/jimmy-kimmel-sheds-64-audience-after-short-lived-ratings-spike-following-suspension Jimmy Kimmel Live!" has also seen its ratings drop significantly over the past decade, as the program averaged 2.4 million viewers in 2015 and has been trending downward ever since. Kimmel’s program averaged 2.2 million in 2016 and 2017, fell to 2.1 million in 2018, dropped to 1.9 million in 2019 and sunk to 1.8 million in 2020. By 2021, "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" managed only 1.5 million nightly viewers. Kimmel’s 2025 average viewership of 1.6 million was down 37% compared to 2015 totals when Disney decided to temporarily sideline him. His average in 2025 was 1.6 mil so he’s up 770k on his average.

Except he never said anything close to that…

Looks like the good guys won the Kimmel culture war. Is playing the imperial march on a dc street protected by the 1st amendment? https://www.dailydot.com/news/tiktoker-follows-national-guard-playing-imperial-march-star-wars/

And inflation increases. No such thing as a free lunch. https://www.kansascityfed.org/research/economic-review/do-the-effects-of-interest-rate-changes-depend-on-inflation/

I hope you're correct. The negative ads will come. already on here. https://townhall.com//tipsheet/jeff-charles/2025/09/29/winsome-sears-ad-n2664129#google_vignette https://www.advocate.com/politics/winsome-earle-sears-transphobic-commercial

I brought up demographics. You brought up subsets of demographics within Chicago so your point is that demographics matter in the comparison of homicide rates. Wasn't that my point?

not so sure. My end of the state will definitely vote red. And people will buy into the maga ads.

trying to make a point: we all use fallacies but some use them almost exclusively.

when they go low, we go high.

Well, yes. Obviously. But it's probably the best public golf course in America and extremely difficult. It should be possible to have a major international tournament there. But it's not. The ironic thing is that there's a large Irish population on LI.

That's easy. They're angry.

Red Herring Fallacy The red herring fallacy refers to an instance in which one speaker attempts to divert the attention of another speaker from the primary argument by offering a point which may be true, but which does not actually further the substance of a counterargument. So named for the implication that the odoriferous fish in question might “throw one off the scent” of the actual argument itself, the red herring will typically support a conclusion with a fact which does not actually provide substantive support. Example 1: Child: This fish tastes funny. I don’t want to eat this. Parent: There are children starving in Africa. Eat your dinner. The topic is gun control's effect on the homicide rate.....my point about different demographics was in response to your study (which salient but flawed)