Joe Ferguson forever

Deplorable but at least you’re honest.

he wasn't in violation. yjey didn't need to threaten ABC. They could have just followed established FCC enforcement measures. trump wasn't banned from twitter through coercion on the goats part...

you keep posting this. I'm not a lawyer and I'l;l bet you aren't either. II don't think the excerpt supports your narrative. Perhaps one of the boards lawyers cn chime in. Constitutional lawyers appear to have a consensus that this was unconstitutional.

so why did the FCC need to threaten?

What might be untrue? The sleazy FCC director publicly bragged about threatening Disney and Nexstar

"jawboning" https://www.kuow.org/stories/legal-experts-say-pulling-jimmy-kimmel-from-air-may-amount-to-illegal-jawboning The decision is not happening in a vacuum. Nexstar announced recently that it is in the process of trying to acquire its rival, Tegna, in a deal estimated to be worth $6.2 billion that is subject to the review of Carr's FCC. Nexstar also needs Carr's support to loosen regulations to complete the deal. Under current rules, no one company can own stations that reach more than 39% of U.S. households. The Nexstar-Tegna tie-up is estimated to extend the company's combined reach into 80% of American homes. Carr celebrated the series of events kicked off by Nexstar, thanking the company on X for "doing the right thing." Carr wrote: "I hope that other broadcasters follow Nexstar's lead."

from your link: The First Amendment also prohibits the government from coercing private actors to take actions that suppress other private entities' speech.11

i mean the biggest liar on the planet ordering his minions to go after critics. and the sheeple calmly accept it....

look at yall celebrating the loss of free speech. Freedom!

prater!

and he couldn't be happier

bosa sack coming

which one the hill catch early?

hill actually caught that inbounds

shank. but he's been great otherwise.

Hold my beer while I dance

He’s right this time.

the graph shows the median used car price at a low of 22k and a high of 31k. That's a bit less than a 40% increase. for easier math, lets say it actually increased more - 50%. if a 5k car appreciated 50% in that period it would be worth 7.5k on the market. 7.2k on 40% appreciation.

Nick Fuentes is correct!

" Beaters that people used to be able to buy for $5000 were selling for $10,000" at it's highest, the prices increased 50% in that time period. your example was 100%. So you were off by a factor of 2 even for the very short period of time that was true. It' not my graph. It's from Car gurus

then you should be aware of this graph https://www.cargurus.com/research/price-trends?entityIds=Index&startDate=1609477200000&endDate=1758167999999 plug 1/1/2021 into the program. prices went up in 2021 and stayed there but they nowhere near doubled at any point. your example is bs.

people spending beyond their means is not new. Getting into credit trouble by not being able to keep up with payments is record breaking. This suggests a weakening economy. The mcdonald's CEO is correct that most people with sizable investments in the stock market are earners over $100k. They're good.

bs. people are still buying cars with 7 year loans. if you need a 7 year loan, you can't afford the car. And now they appropriately won't be able to get the credit. Shortages would lead to less loans not more. And what percentage increase on average was there on cars in 2021 and 2022? I doubt 2024-25 models are cheaper than 2022.

He knows his customers and he's worried. only 20% of Americans make $100k or more. This and the credit score slump (lower income people without credit) will lead to decreased demand for goods and services further slowing the economy. Not good at all.

don't worry. He loves you. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/trump-loves-the-poorly-educated-and-social-media-clamors-idUSKCN0VX2DE/