-
Posts
10,491 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Joe Ferguson forever
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
Joe Ferguson forever replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Firstly, there is no perfectly safe drug. Just ask your compatriot here who refuses pi’s for a precancerous caused by reflux. Secondly, a paper was published in June 2020, not a “ mention”. There was broad skepticism. Yet you jumped in head first.since there was no known treatment, hell why not try bleach? If by some freak of academia someone actually gave you an MD, it should be rescinded. Your takes on covid are cavalier and overflowing with hubris. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
Joe Ferguson forever replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Nope. Wrong again. And you loved this drug for Covid. Another great example of junk science and the fools that buy it. And you’re not even a little bit ashamed try June 2020 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/19/1038369557/ivermectin-anti-vaccine-movement-culture-wars -
that's what i thought. none at the ready cuz there isn't a reputable link, dark one. are you just another female pseudonym for a male maga fascst regularly posting here under another nom de guerre? most females seem to have the sense to avoid the place. but the Irish are known for their feistiness and their drinking.
-
Please provide a link, Ciara.
-
ya know, we live in the wealthiest country in the world. And citizens line up for free food to keep them alive. Many still have no health insurance. the current administration will make this much worse. And those lining up or soon to be lining up, cheer it. Lunacy but that's where we are. People unconsciously voting against their own interests. I guess that's part of the reason they are where they are and why the country is where it is.
-
sure. It's nether what you said nor what you're currently doing. Be better.
-
I asked what your purpose is. That's what you came up with. That's f'n foolish and not very rewarding. If it is, it's a sorry life you lead.
-
if I required your help, I would be in serious trouble. Re helping you, one can't fix stupid. But I enjoy making you look foolish.
-
Sure, Democrats only hold manual labor jobs...shovel, dig, carry. No purpose. What's your purpose?
-
no thanks. Have an excellent financial advisor whose tax advice and steady, strong returns are just what I need. But I play around with he market in small bits. LLY and TLRY were my big hitters. TLRY was an excellent example of investor sentiment outweighing fundamentals. no reason for it to ever go over 100 but it did. Now back to 1$. I sure don't try to time shorts tho. That's serious gambling.
-
sadly, it could happen. and that would make you happy. so f'in strange.
-
never again. the changing demographics and American history suggest otherwise. are you suggesting an end to elections? do you think that's part of the plan? would you approve of that?
-
Oh, a book! Fauci actually edited the seminal textbook on Infectious disease still widely used by residents and fellows. He went to Cornell for med school. I'll wager that at least a few if not many of the virologists polled work at top caliber institutions around the world and that several have written books. Likely all have published papers. But hey, a book! you just can't fix stupid. It's undeniable but I keep trying.
-
did you just miss probably? Perhaps you should read while mouthing the words aloud. And maybe when you write as well. Please interpret this to English: The meta-analysis of conflict of influence research is very clear.
-
All of that is cool. But it is far from the kind of market support this tech should see if it was viewed as a some panacea to our energy issues and global oil geopolitics, as you suggested. re the timing, the five year chart shows typical peaks and valleys including a peak years back that was higher than todays. you would have actually lost money if you bought then. Overall, a SPYDR would likely have outperformed it over 5 years.
-
great! so virologists' opinions are to be ignored but you stake your claim on a virologist who says the origin was PROBABLY from the lab. Do you see how stupid that is? An opinion piece in the NYT is not of equal weight of even a mention in Science. If you had bothered to even look at the study, you would have found ample details to criticize it. But both citations, yours and mine, strongly indicate that the origin of covid is not settled science. Probably🤣... I'm gonna change your name to "Dr" Gremlin.
-
Wondering what "Dr" Ford Pinto thinks of this https://www.science.org/content/article/virologists-and-epidemiologists-back-natural-origin-covid-19-survey-suggests
-
I worked in 2 graduate science departments while doing an MS and MD. Also did some independent research at another major university. As you are no doubt aware, you get to know most of the faculty and grad students within a department very well through symposia, lectures, dissertation presentations etc. My wife also is a graduate level scientist. We certainly met some strange and unusual characters. As they say, genius is often borderline insanity. But I know of only one faculty member who fudged results and no grad students. Could I just be unaware of some? Sure.