Jump to content

Lori

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lori

  1. Correct, Answer Man. Here's a relevant passage:

    "NFL rules allow teams to designate players as "Physically Unable to Perform." Once they are designated as such, they are prohibited from practicing with the team. They can, however, rehabilitate and participate in team meetings. If a player begins training camp on the PUP list, they can be moved to the active roster at any time, even after one practice. A player is not allowed to be placed on the PUP list if they start training camp on the active roster."

     

    http://www.nfl.com/teams/story/DET/5547626

  2. Thanx for the opinions, all. Right now it's down to my gut instinct as to whether or not the 49ers will be in enough games to get Barlow his carries, or if they'll be so horrendous that they'll be throwing the ball on every down after halftime...... it's between him and Jackson, because I seriously think the 'Squawks could be a Super Bowl team (with DJ being a big part of that offense).

     

    Flip-floppin' away on that. Ah well, still got almost 24 hours....

  3. Man you can't be serious

    14667[/snapback]

    Shaw/Reed 2003 stats: 114 catches, 1320 yards, 6 TD.

     

    Dunno, I thought he was being serious.... could be wrong, though....

     

    estro and Tiger, you hit on something that hasn't gotten nearly enough airtime among all the "OL/backup QB/start-me-or-trade-me RBs" hysteria: in three out of three preseason games - and let's throw the scrimmage in there too, for good measure - the starting D has been allowing huge runs off cutback moves.

     

    Browns: Suggs 50-yarder

    Broncos: several good runs by Griffin, averaged almost 5ypc.

    Titans: ditto for Brown. No, worse - averaged over 6ypc.

    Colts: the Dominick Rhodes Show. Not as good an average as the other two, but still had a few 10+ yard runs.

     

    Not liking that trend. No, not one bit.

  4. and who was Atlanta's back up QB last year??? oh ok, I guess Molds was catching 100 balls when Rob Johnson was throwing him the ball too huh??? you guys

    14642[/snapback]

    Not quite, but he did catch 94 back in 2000, including 63 in the 11 games Rob started.

     

    As for Price - he wanted to be a #1 receiver. That's his prerogative. But with Moulds already here, it wasn't going to happen for him in Buffalo. He knew that, and knew Atlanta - already where he made his offseason home - needed a #1 WR. Read any of his quotes from that offseason, and you can tell he was already packing his bags.... just like Antoine Winfield this last offseason.

     

    Would it have been nice to keep him here? Yeah, but it wasn't going to happen. Just my opinion.....

  5. Actually darling, the 2003 Buffalo Bills offense would be the "control group"

    having an entire season of production.  A valid statistical sample.  The 2004

    preseason offense would be the "experimental group".  Less information to work

    with and not an actual experiment.

     

    The experimental group is compared to the control group when analyzing data.

     

    Dr. SoCal-Surf says:  No improvement noted to date. 

    Extrapolate that.

    14421[/snapback]

    Wrong again. The alleged 2004 Bills offense includes three starters who WEREN'T EVEN ON THE TEAM LAST YEAR. (Four, if Evans beats out Reed.)

    I repeat: "Same ol same ol ?!? :lol:"

     

    Am I saying this is one of the greatest o-lines of the modern era? uhhh.... not exactly.

    -Will Jennings play 16 games this season? Not holding my breath on that one, since it hasn't happened yet in his career.

    -Is MW finally ready to live up to his potential? Your guess is as good as mine.

    -Lawrence Smith definitely seems to be an upgrade over Mike Pucillo... but that's not saying a whole lot. Is that good enough? Dunno; tune in September 12th and start finding out.

     

    What I AM saying is that pre-judging a team's entire season from 11 plays in ONE preseason game is perhaps jumping the gun a bit, "darling". If you've got a problem with that opinion, too f%#!ing bad.

  6. And then we wouldn't have to listen to those stupid Ole, Ole, Ole cheers.  Aren't they soccer game cheers anyhow?

    13893[/snapback]

    Didn't see the game, but it was played in Montreal, correct? Guessing that wasn't "Ole" you heard, but "Allez". (French for "Go". Never could figure out why they do the "Go Habs Go" chant in English.)

     

    Saw the highlights on Sportscenter. Glad to find out Canada wore those jerseys to honor a specific team - didn't think they'd design something that hideous without some good reason....

  7. Wow,  that makes me fell a lot better.  You are really spinning this thing hard.

     

    When I say "starting unit", I mean the overall starting unit, as opposed to the

    second or third team units.

    13462[/snapback]

     

    Well then, if you mean the entire "starting unit", then they have played a grand total of 11 plays together - the first two drives of the Titans game. Think that's a valid statistical sample to extrapolate an entire 16-game season from? I don't.

     

    Spin that.

  8. Denver: Pucillo at LG, M. Price at RT.

    Tennessee: current starting 5.

    Indy: Sullivan at LT.

     

    So, since the alleged "starting unit" has actually only started one of the three games, let's look at their playing time in that Tennessee game a little closer (although even that is skewed somewhat, since L. Smith and Tucker split time at LG).....

     

    Drive 1:

    Henry 2yds, Henry 4yds, DB-to-EM 7yds, Henry 22yds, DB-EM 35yds. 1st-and-10 at TEN 18, DB-EM 7yds, stupid PF on Shelton makes it 2nd-and-18. DB-JR 11yds, 3rd and 7 at the 15. Henry fumble on fake reverse (recovered by MW), FG.

     

    Drive 2: 3-and-out. MW whiff on 1st down, TH -5yds; screen to Evans, no gain (missed block by Campbell on the outside); screen to Henry, 3yds.

     

    Drive 3: Tucker in at LG. Henry 4yds; TEN penalty, Henry no gain; DB incomplete. TEN offsides=1st down. Incomplete (another MW whiff, the play TH got hurt on), McGahee 11yds, 1st-and-goal at the 6. WM no gain, DB to Campbell 4 yds, 3rd-and-goal at the 2. Bledsoe trip/grounding (threw ball away after 5 seconds on game clock), FG.

     

    Drive 4: 1st-and-goal at the 5 after McGee return. Brown in at QB, 2nd-string WR/TE, but the first-team line is still in there, as is the TEN first-string D. WM 2yds, WM 3yds-TD.

     

    Four first-half drives. Three scores - 2 FG, 1 TD (albeit on a very short field). Two bad plays by MW, in his first action of the preseason. Two badly-executed - and somewhat questionable - playcalls on 3rd downs inside the TEN 20 (fake reverse, play-action on 3rd-and-goal from the 2).

     

    Stats from those drives:

    Henry: 7-27 yds, 3.9 ypc, 0 TD

    McGahee 4-16 yds, 4.0 ypc, 1 TD

    Bledsoe 7-10, 67 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT, 0 sacks.

     

    That's one TD, 13 points total, in one half of a preseason game.

    ....and that makes one more offensive TD than in 7 GAMES last year; the 13 points ties or beats *8* games. And the 0 sacks on Bledsoe only happened once last season, vs. Jacksonville.

     

    Same ol same ol? <_<

  9. I see Dorenbos getting cut...they are already phasing him out by having other players work the snapping duties.

    13178[/snapback]

    Well, they tried that Saturday night, anyway.

     

    We saw what happened. :angry:

     

    Could Dorenbos get cut? It's always a possibility, but I'm guessing they'd do it only if they absolutely couldn't live without that roster spot....

  10. Take three "keepers" from the following list:

     

    QB: Steve McNair

     

    RB: Priest Holmes, Fred Taylor, Kevan Barlow, Quentin Griffin, Willis McGahee

     

    WR: Darrell Jackson, Eric Moulds

     

    Combo yardage/TD league, no separate TE category (they count as WRs), can play either 3RB/3WR or 2/4. Last year's keepers were PH, FT, and Moulds.

     

    Holmes is obvious. Taylor is most likely #2. Keep in mind, I'm either drafting 11th or 12th in a 12-team league (tied for points title last season, haven't done the coin flip yet. And that means 11/12 in EVERY round, not at the top of round 2/4/6/etc....) I might try to move Barlow or Griffin to get a higher pick, but our league doesn't do a lot of trading.

     

    Conflicted as to whether to protect 3 RB and draft the best QB or WR in round 1, or maybe keep McNair. (If you believe the various "cheat sheets", my top 3 RBs are also the three highest-ranked players...)

     

    Thoughts?

  11. They had to save roster spots for Pussywillow and Fumblin' Freddie.  They must cut Pucillo,  he has become the symbol for the Bills ineptitude on the interior OL, and they could have saved some face with fans if they had done it now.

    13092[/snapback]

    You really think they'll keep Johnny - Freddy - whoever? :angry:

     

    ecch. This is one time I really, really, REALLY hope youre wrong, BADOL.

  12. The Eagles are definately a team that looks to be going for it all this year. Though I'm not sure Westbrook is strong enough to hold up for an entire season and be "the man" for their running attack. Not to mention some question marks in the secondary with the absence of Vincent and Taylor.

     

    In terms of the Jags, who do they have at DE now that Douglas and Brackens are gone?

    12619[/snapback]

    Paul Spicer, Lionel Barnes, Bobby McCray, Brandon Green, and Courtland Bullard (a college LB listed at DE on Ourlads' depth chart). Their 3rd-round pick, Jorge Cordova, is gone for the year with a knee injury.

     

    I repeat what I said earlier today: looking at that underwhelming list, the Jagwires must really figure Douglas is done to have cut him loose....

     

    (As for the Iggles: watch Thomas Tapeh. He's listed as a FB, but I remember him being the "feature back" at Minnesota. Tough runner who could end up being better than Buckhalter, IMO....)

  13. If Jason Gildon is washed up, then Hugh Douglas' rotting corpse has been decaying on the beach for quite some time now.

    11953[/snapback]

    Nice take... even for a Pats fan.... ;)

     

    I'm looking at what the Jags have left on the roster at DE. Not impressed. So if they think they can't get anything more out of Douglas (or Brackens, for that matter), why would any other team be able to? :D

  14. "Alumni Day" is scheduled for the home opener, and every living member of the '64 championship team has been invited back for an on-field ceremony. (Yup, even Lou Saban and Cookie, although don't be surprised if they're both no-shows...) Sounds like most of them have already confirmed they'll be attending.

     

    So sayeth Denny Lynch at the June Bills Booster Club meeting.

  15. Care to share what happened for those of us who weren't there last year...? :D

     

    CW

    9706[/snapback]

    I think Rockpile just did. :D

     

    Seriously, though, I hope we can do without any ambulance calls to Hammer's lot this year. (And I'm guessing Campy would really, REALLY agree with that.)

  16. Thanks for the quick response, Jack.

     

    Hmmm - if bridges can cause a problem, then it probably won't work at the plant.

    This is where I work - the batch "tower" is where the raw materials for the glass are mixed, the large rooftops towards the back are our warehouses, and the manufacturing facility itself is in between. (You can get a good idea of the scale by comparing with the railroad cars parked out front...)

     

    Original structure dates back close to a hundred years, with many later additions; literally tons and tons of iron/steel/concrete. Multiple floors, depending on which part of the plant you're in. Lots of heavy-duty electrical wiring, as well - that pic doesn't show it, but we have our own substation.

    Internet access is not an option on the factory floor.

     

    Hmmm. Could find a place where the reception is decent, then patch it into our intercom system - did that with a radio out in the maintenance building. (Or sneak an antenna up onto the roof, and buy lots of cable.)

    But if I was hoping to walk in with a Sirius-equipped boombox and expect it to pick up a signal from inside the packaging dept., sounds like I'll end up being disappointed. Good to know that ahead of time.

     

    That NFL Sunday Drive still sounds like a sweet deal, though... and that's built into the normal cost of the subscription, instead of added on (like the DTV Sunday Ticket), right?

     

    Decisions, decisions.... :D

×
×
  • Create New...