Not by a long shot. BN Web site > any Gannett newspaper, including Indy and Rochester. Have I mentioned lately how much I despise the Gannett cookie-cutter template? And I love anything Mike Vaccaro writes, but the Post's site makes my eyes hurt.
Dr.Dank, my mentor in the business relayed to me something his mentor told him, a long time ago: "News is what people are talking about." Here's his take on how that relates to covering sports: "After a game, I try to figure out what the people are discussing about it as they leave. If I've answered their question (or questions) and addressed their observations, I've done my job." That's worked well for him over the years, and I'm trying to follow those guidelines in my own writing.
Of course, you're dead on about the rise of "infotainment": if people didn't care about the Celebrities Gone Wild stuff, there wouldn't be a market for it. And when the Brett-to-the-Jets soap opera was in full force, football fans were talking about it whether they'd read the latest updates or not. Hence, it received heavy coverage.
But there are still good people in the business, doing great work. Ask R. Rich about his brother, an investigative journalist who helped get a crooked mayor booted out of office, then broke a mortgage-fraud story that ended up with the culprits going to prison. Maybe his stories don't get as many hits as the most recent Britney update, but they're out there.
As for the crime-ridden "Latest Local News"? Not much room for daily enterprise stuff any more, and fewer people left to write it. So, as the industry continues its downhill slide, you'll likely see more police reports and school-board meeting recaps, not less. And like it or not, they are newsworthy. If I lived on Elmwood or Clinton (to pick a couple of street names out of the current headlines), I'd want to know about any potentially dangerous situations in my neighborhood ...