dollars 2 donuts

Yeah, it has been known for a little while that we'd pretty much like the Chargers to run the table.

I love that we get to talk like this in December. No, we have never won a Super Bowl and I am going to go out on a limb and say it seems unlikely we will win one this year...but this is a blast, isn't it?

THAT, WAS AN EVEN EASIER THUMBS UP, CB!!!

ah, ah, ah...I hear you, my friend. However, If the Pats beat the Steelers next week the Jags stand a real shot of a first round bye if they beat the Titans at the end of the season as they win tie breakers against Pittsburgh. So...oh, man...can't believe I am saying this...go Pats.

I knew someone was going to write it even before I finished reading the OT. You had the quickest fingers. ...did you get called that a lot in high school? GO BILLS!

You are a wise man, GB. I am with you on the above. Niners I believe are even favored next week against the Titans (didn't check, a buddy told me). Man, that and a loss to the rams the following week would make our Pats game almost meaningless (hoping that the Bolts are in first at that time).

Exactly what I was going to say. You got an easy up vote there from me, 26CB.

Truthfully, PTT, I believe you should be rooting for them against the Steelers next week, as well. The Steelers lose tie breakers with the Jags and if the Jags are still in the first round bye race the final week of the season they will bring it against the Titans...a game critical to us.

Didn’t our rb, the one with all the kids who got arrested, heck why can’t I remember...Travis henry? didnt he have one against the bengals in his rookie or second year?

Indeed. As I lost my father almost 10 years ago I still have in my wallet right now the ticket stub from the last game we ever went to, The Giants in 2007. Football was a common and binding ground.

That was beautiful. Thank you.

Agree with you, with the caveat that a 7-9 record next year will not be a failure if we draft the kid we NEED at QB and he throws for 25 tds and almost 4,000 yards, but didn't have the tools because we traded up to get him. I am fine with that season and getting him the tools going forward. ...I am also fine with paying what would likely be our best quarterback in 20 years, and hopefully a potential or near star in the league right off the bat, only 5 million per for 4 seasons, giving us the ability to play around with money and get him help.

You up-vote w***e! Throw in a picture of Kelly and you'll always get an up-tick from me.

Tatonka68, just to be sure you are in the "we need a QB now" camp, right? Just kidding, my friend. Honestly, it has to stop. It has stop. I want one in the first round, too, and the best one we can get. However, other stupidity (i know, previous regimes, but still) has to stop, as well. The hell with hindsight as I liked him in the third round then, but nobody on this board...No. Body. would have traded up in the third round to get TJ Graham instead of Russell Wilson. No, he would not have been THE Russell Wilson, but he could have sat behind Fitzy for a year, unless he just plain beat him out in his rookie season. They ended up getting rid of Fitzy anyways and I doubt they were considering him a sacred cow even after they signed him.

Can get you 3/4 of the way to a quality receiver or resigning Benjamin, depending upon what you see in possible last 4 games for him. Not to hijack this thread, just a tangent; right now i'm thinking that with our first five picks, considering that we should expect them to contribute, QB, DL, WR, OL, LB in no particular order, other than QB being first.

If they decide not to keep Tyrod as insurance I believe that frees up another 10-12 million in caps space.

I've responded previously in this thread, but not necessarily to the OT. That said, in my opinion and respectfully, enough is enough. The start must be with a new QB and you must do whatever it possibly takes to get the best QB that you think is the long term future of this team. Doesn't mean that QB will be the long term future, but that is what you must have to start with after most 18 years of futility at the position. They had hopes for EJ, but I believe those were simply hopes, even if you ask them about it. They just needed somebody at that point. Our last winning season Kyle Orton's stats projected over 16 games (and I am not saying he was great by any stretch) would have been 4,000 yards passing, 24 TDs and 14 picks. Man, we need at least that production regardless of any back and forth we do on these boards. I always liked Tyrod. However, I need 3,500 yards and 24 or so TDs from him and if the ONLY WAY I get that from him is having the best options at receiver/TE and one of the best OLines in football, then I just don't think he's that guy. We need a change and it should probably come from the best possible option in the draft.

I'm sorry, I mis-typed and I will correct. I meant to say I am really not interested in Jackson.

I'll tell you though, BFM, I have this feeling that we may even be looking at the 5th or 6th QB if we don't move. I used to like him a lot, but right now I am really not interested in taking Jackson. ...as I've stated before I would have loved Watson last year, even reaching at 10...which obviously now would have been fortuitous.

IF we do what you suggest, BFM, some early mock draft (a couple of weeks ago, can't remember which) had us taking that DLineman from Ohio State, I believe at 18. Again, I stress if we don't move up, I would be fine with a QB (pick 12-15?) /DL first round. Still, my druthers would still be to end up with one of those picks in the top 10. I know some here (including me) have talked about tank mode in the first round, but I have no problems with KC finishing 6-10!

Since every team now gets a Thursday night game it became an easy-excuse dumping ground for the League to put a team there that doesn't play well in the evenings and isn't that interesting to watch...box checked. "Go away, Buffalo and your fans." NFL: "...wait, wait, wait. We apologize. Here's a London game for you, too. Hey, howzabout you play half your games in Toronto?!"

It it is not enough. We need to lose out and trade up with the team's first mentioned above. If we get to 9 there is not going to be a qb left to do the things you want him to do. For the love of all get out Cleveland, Giants, Denver all taking qbs and all ahead of us right now. they have to hit the top three, and even that may not be enough.

Please, Vince, you are making me sick. I wanted him at 10, regardless of him still being around if you moved down.

He'd have to want to play for us considering there will be other offers, and he better be the real deal especially for this team, because 5-6 years, 125-150 million, with about 75 million guaranteed is tough to walk away from than 5 years and maybe 25 million that a top three rookie qb might cost us.

I am so into tank mode right now, after today's game. I'm closing in on 50 years old, been to more than 200 games in my life, including wide right and th comeback and I am ready for this. Would love both picks in the top 15, preferably 1 in the top 10 and I would be romancing the 49ers (if they hold at 3) like they are the girl I couldn't live without. "You want 10, 15 and 42? Let's talk, baby."