Cugalabanza

Whatever, infant

Damn...

So you think the Pretzel Industrial Complex is behind this?

I want to start a band just so I can use that as the band name.

"Disappearance of souls." Nifty little workaround. Ontologically dubious, but politically expedient. Stupid and pandering enough that it just might work. Anyway, hopefully on the next conference call with God, Pontiff guy can bring up a way of simplifying the rules for getting into heaven. This whole two feet in and "complete the process" thing isn't working. ***EDIT: Hold on a sec... Upon review, the Vatican is changing the ruling on the field. There is sufficient evidence for them to state, once again, that "The souls of sinners descend into hell, where they suffer "eternal fire." Please re-set the play clock, remains second down.

That’s about it. If you’re Michael Cohen, you care A LOT!

Haven't heard that. Where did that come from?

Do you doubt her story? I'm not saying infidelity is an impeachable offense. It's not. But what's the point of trying to discredit this person whose account is completely credible?

Who isn't?

Yeah, it's not far-fetched. I think what we know of Trump is that his flaws & vices are many, but they're also obvious. We may already know, for the most part, the extent of his shady dealings.

The Shallow State war is heating up now too. Manafort & Gates shouldn’t make a lot of long term personal plans in my opinion. Wouldn’t it be funny if we go through something of a bipartisan purge in DC over the next few years and among the few left standing is Trump? If it turns out he’s a shyster, a bully and a womanizer, but clean legally speaking? The true Mr. Magoo!

I watched the interview. Stormy seemed very sober & even-tempered to me. Just sayin’

Stay gold, Ponyboy. Stay gold.

Me

Obviously, not all speech is protected. Threats, slander, incitement to violence,... But just being a dick and having terrible ideas, people are free to do that. Ideally, we should be grateful to them for so clearly showing us who they truly are.

I'm not disputing any of this.

No calling out you or Tasker. It's just that there was a bit of a climate in here a while back when some had concerns about the AGENDA of some hate groups, being accused of wanting to deny free speech.

Yeah. He's railing against his own fantasy scenario. It's not real.

It’s odd that some of the same people who were in such a hurry to champion freedom of speech when white supremacist groups were protesting now want so badly for these teenagers to shut up.

You need help.

Yeah, holy ****, they might not be able to live up the standard of excellence set by previous generations.

Fair enough. As a practical point, people with power in journalism have always manipulated things according to their interests. But to state that bias as what is to be understood as the ideal of journalism... that's a step further into crazy.

PPP, the rational board.

Yeah, that guy's not helping his case at all. I agree completely that this view of journalism as activism is bonkers.