ALLinALLEN

Couldnt be concerned in the slightest. It's 1 game and we played our C game at best. 3 turnovers, 1 in our red zone and one in theirs. The Pats played their A game and got some lucky plays (Maye first pass of last drive). All that considered we lost by a last second 52 yard FG. Chiefs are staring down 2-4, Ravens are out of it pretty much, and its the Colts in the top seed currently.... Deep breaths ppl.

There are certainly teams that "rotate" as you say, but they are mainly teams that don't have a true Number 1 (KC for example, except even Kelce was at 90%+). Most teams are playing their WR1+2 at over 90%

No, the entire year 2024. You can look for yourself here - Snap Counts by Team - Footballguys

Actually, he's right minus KC. Philly, Wash, Det, Cincy....etc....(what he posted earlier) their #1-#2 guys play consistently at over 85%

"Everybody Eats" is the easier way to say "we dont have anyone that can beat you"

I'll add something that has been pretty frustrating and glaring to me this season. Beane and McD have continued to POUR assets into the Defense via draft, FA, etc.. - we all know that. And it hasn't worked out - which we also know. Meanwhile, the rules of the game are HEAVILY favored to the offense right now. I mean just within the last few years weve got D PI flags constantly being thrown, QB's protected like crazy from hits etc...and the new kickoff rules basically give you the ball at the 35 every drive. That coupled with kickers being automatic (which is funny we even thought to keep Bass) basically makes it incredibly easy to get points. Oh and our QB is a gun slinging MVP. Given all this - we STILL neglect to give Allen the tools he needs at WR. It's mind blowing. You give Allen an elite WR option, and a few Cook runs, and you should immediately be in FG range EVERY DRIVE. But no, we trot out guys like Curits Samuel and Tyrell Shavers who cant get open, throw jump balls to Keon Coleman, and hope Kincaid can go for 70+ weekly as a TE. All while pouring assets into the Defense, which is a losing game nowadays. With all the rules and favor to the offense right now, it seems to me Beane is unwilling to adapt. Does he understand this?

At least TBD is still free!

Numbers look like duct tape

you let diggs go for 146, 11 penalties, and turned it over 3 times...bad loss but were in for the long haul and this outcome has me zeroed worried for how well look post season. clean it TF up.

That's extremely surprising if true, and I'm extremely hesitant to believe that polling. Every other poll I can find has drastically different results, for example one from literally last month with 11% approval.

If he comes back and we cut Prater...and Bass misses just ONE kick that's makeable....we suddenly have a kicker problem. With Prater, I feel confident in every kick. That's way more than I can say now about Bass (who I actually would get nervous for on crucial EXTRA POINTS FFS!)

Pretty great intro monologue by Kimmel tonight, and I never watch him. Thought it was a great message about free speech/censorship....not that most on the PPP will care to listen. Also had to find a stream online since it's blocked in my city

No. Allen has 700+ yards, 5-0 ratio, moves the ball as if easier than pie right now. I've felt more confident watching this offense than I've ever been in the Allen era. No issues whatsoever.

Taylor rapp Jesus Christ dude please stop diving at our own players

Agreed, but ya know, it was just his low ratings that got him removed, right? Right? 😑

Thoughts?

WGR homepage has a quote from McD saying Milano "could return this week". I'm now hopeful this injury is way overblown and he will certainly be good by January (which is all we really need).

This cant be a real thought you had today

If it counts/replaces an international game we play once every few years, sure - but if they make it a 1x a year thing for 5 years or whatever, we riot

There are quite a few interesting names on the FA list, but I doubt we dip into that so early.

I’ve seen enough - I want this guy for the year. Bye bass.

Ok man, whatever floats your boat. Sorry we disagree.

You're changing topics now? I'm saying I wouldn't label them as Antifa unless they are active in those communities, or write some sort of manifesto claiming that. Sheesh.

Abortion, trans people, gay people....there are certainly MAGA issues that have even lead to shootings. If I change my example to trans people...someone writes"down with trans" on bullets, same point stands. But yes, if said person is in MAGA chat rooms, MAGA rallies, photo with hats on...then yeah can label. Same here - if this kid is in Antifa chat rooms, at meetups, has branding..then yes, label it. I'm not lumping them into a basket yet - just calling them a deranged mentally ill person for now.

Sure. In a short example: Say a person with anti-illegal immigrant views shoots up a facility full of illegal immigrants...Say he even writes "go back to your country" on his guns/bullets. I don't state that he is "Part of the MAGA movement". He just shares views that MAGA also shares. You (from what I can tell) would lump said person into MAGA. You are lumping this kid into "ANTIFA" when he has no direct affiliation other than some of his views. That's what I think (at least) we disagree on.